Examining the Influence of Family Environments on Youth Violence: A Comparison of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Non-Latino Black, and Non-Latino White Adolescents
- 819 Downloads
Existing research rarely considers important ethnic subgroup variations in violent behaviors among Latino youth. Thus, their risk for severe violent behaviors is not well understood in light of the immense ethnic and generational diversity of the Latino population in the United States. Grounded in social control theory and cultural analyses of familism, we examine differences in the risk for severe youth violence, as well its associations with family cohesion, parental engagement, adolescent autonomy, household composition, and immigrant generation among Mexican (n = 1,594), Puerto Rican (n = 586), Cuban (n = 488), and non-Latino Black (n = 4,053), and White (n = 9,921) adolescents with data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Results indicate a gradient of risk; White youth had the lowest risk for severe violence and Puerto Rican youth had the highest risk compared to all other racial/ethnic subgroups. Within-group analysis indicates that family factors are not universally protective or risk-inducing. While family cohesion decreased the risk of severe violence among all groups, parental engagement was associated with increased risk among Blacks and Whites, and adolescent autonomy was associated with increased risk among Puerto Ricans and Cubans. In addition, Cuban and White adolescents who lived in single parent households or who did not live with their parents, had higher risk for severe violent behaviors than their counterparts who lived in two parent households. Among Latinos, the association of immigrant generation was in opposite directions among Mexicans and Cubans. We conclude that family and immigration factors differentially influence risk for violence among Latino subgroups and highlight the significance of examining subgroup differences and developing intervention strategies that are tailored to the needs of each ethnic subgroup.
KeywordsYouth violence Families Latinos Hispanics Mexicans Puerto Ricans Cubans
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development: Research paradigms, present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bui, H. N., & Thongniramol, O. (2005). Immigration and self-reported delinquency: The interplay of immigration generations, gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28(2), 71–99.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Youth risk behavioral surveillance—United States, 2007. MMWR, Surveillance Summaries, 57 (SS-4).Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). January 12, 2010 http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html.
- Chantala, K., & Tabor, J. (1999). Strategies to perform design-based analysis using the Add Health data. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/using/guides/weight1.pdf.
- Collazo, S. G., Ryan, C. L., & Bauman, K. J. (2010). Profile of the Puerto Rican population in the Untied States and Puerto Rico: 2008. U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division. Paper presented at the population association of America annual meeting, Dallas, TX, April 15–17, 2010.Google Scholar
- Dahlberg, L. L., & Krug, E. G. (2002). Violence—A global public health problem. In E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- Fischer, M. J., & Tienda, M. (2006). Redrawing spatial color lines: Hispanic metropolitan dispersal, segregation, and economic opportunity. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Committee on population, division of behavioral and social sciences and education (pp. 100–137). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Entzel, P., Tabor, J., Bearman, P. S., & Udry, J. R. (2008). The national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Research design. Website: http://www.cpn.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ingoldsby, B. B. (1991). The Latin American family: Familism vs. machismo. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 22(1), 57–62.Google Scholar
- Kamo, Y. (2000). Racial and ethnic differences in extended family households. Sociological Perspectives, 42(2), 211–229.Google Scholar
- Landale, N. S., Oropesa, R. S., & Bradatan, C. (2006). Hispanic families in the United States: Family structure and process in an Era of family change. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Committee on population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (pp. 138–178). National Academies Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Lomnitz, L., & Pérez-Lizaur, M. (1991). Dynastic growth and survival strategies: The solidarity of Mexican grand-families. In E. Jelin (Ed.), Family, household and gender relations in Latin America (pp. 123–132). New York, NY: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
- McAdoo, H. P. (2000). Transference of values of African American families and children. National Council on Family Relations Report, 42(2):F5, F7–F9.Google Scholar
- Ornelas, I. J., Perreira, K. M., & Ayala, G. X. (2007). Parental influences on adolescent physical activity: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Osius, E., & Rosenthal, J. (2009). The National Research Council/Institute of Medicine’s Adolescent Health Services: Highlights and Considerations for State Health Policymakers, National Academy for State Health Policy, September 2009.Google Scholar
- Reimers, C. (2006). Economic well-being. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (pp. 291–361). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Rumbaut, R. G. (2006). The making of a people. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (pp. 16–65). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Sabogal, F., Marin, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., VanOss Marin, B., & Pérez-Stable, E. (1987). Latino familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t? Latino Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397–412.Google Scholar
- Schneider, B., Martínez, S., & Owens, A. (2006). Barriers to educational opportunities for hispanics in the United States. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (pp. 179–227). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Vásquez García, H. A., García Coll, C., Erkut, S., Alarcón, O., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Family values of Latino adolescents. In M. Montero-Sieburth & F. Villarruel (Eds.), Making invisible Latino adolescents visible: A critical approach to Latino diversity. New York, NY: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 176–204). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar