Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 825–838 | Cite as

Adolescent Sexual Activity and the Development of Delinquent Behavior: The Role of Relationship Context

  • K. Paige HardenEmail author
  • Jane Mendle
Empirical Research


Despite the well-established association between adolescent sexual activity and delinquent behavior, little research has examined the potential importance of relationship contexts in moderating this association. The current study used longitudinal, behavioral genetic data on 519 same-sex twin pairs (48.6% female) divided into two age cohorts (13–15 and 16–18 years olds) drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Analyses tested whether adolescent sexual activity that occurred in romantic versus non-romantic relationships was associated with delinquency from adolescence to early adulthood, after controlling for genetic influences. Results indicated that, for both younger and older adolescents, common underlying genes influence both sexual behavior and delinquency. After controlling for these genetic influences, there was no within-twin pair association between sexual activity and delinquency in younger adolescents. In older adolescents, sexual activity that occurred in romantic relationships predicted lower levels of delinquency, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, whereas sexual activity in non-romantic relationships predicted higher levels of delinquency. These results are consistent with emerging research that suggests that the psychological correlates of adolescent sexual activity may be moderated by the social context in which this activity occurs.


Delinquency Behavioral genetics Twin studies Sexual activity Romantic relationships 


  1. Armour, S., & Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescent sexual debut and later delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arsenault, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Rijsdijk, F. V., Jaffee, S. R., et al. (2003). Strong genetic effects on cross-situational antisocial behaviour among 5-year old children according to mothers, teachers, examiner-observers, and twins’ self-reports. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blow, C. M. (2008, December 13). The demise of dating. New York Times. Retrieved from
  4. Bricker, J. B., Stallings, M. C., Corley, R. P., Wadsworth, S. J., Bryan, A., Timberlake, D. S., et al. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on age at sexual initiation in the Colorado Adoption Project. Behavior Genetics, 36, 820–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Caspi, A., Lynam, D., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1993). Unraveling girls delinquency: Biological, dispositional, and contextual contributions to adolescent misbehavior. Developmental Psychology, 29, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, W. A., Henninghausen, K. C., Schmidt, D. T., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Developmental precursors of romantic relationships: A longitudinal analysis. In S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Romantic relationships in adolescence: Developmental perspectives (pp. 69–84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, W. C., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comings, D. E., Muhleman, D., Johnson, J. P., & MacMurray, J. P. (2002). Parent-daughter transmission of the androgen receptor gene as an explanation for the effect of father absence of age at menarche. Child Development, 73, 1046–1051.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Onofrio, B. M., Slutske, W. S., Turkheimer, E., Emery, R. E., Harden, K. P., Heath, A. C., et al. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of childhood conduct problems: A children of twins study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 820–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denizet-Lewis, B. (2004, May 30). Friends, friends with benefits and the benefits of the local mall. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from
  12. Derringer, J., Krueger, R. F., Dick, D., Saccone, S., Grucza, R. A., Agrawal, A., et al. (2010). Predicting sensation seeking from dopamine genes: A candidate system approach. Psychological Science, 21, 1282–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in adolescent male friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dominguez, J. M., & Hull, E. M. (2005). Dopamine, the medial preoptic area, and male sexual behavior. Physiology & Behavior, 86, 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donald, M., Lucke, J., Dunne, M., & Raphael, B. (1995). Gender differences associated with young people’s emotional reactions to sexual intercourse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doughty, D., & Rodgers, J. L. (2000). Behavior genetic modeling of menarche in US females. In J. L. Rodgers, D. C. Rowe, & W. B. Miller (Eds.), Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences (pp. 169–181). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Dunne, M. P., Martin, N. G., Statham, D. J., Slutske, W. S., Dunwiddie, S. H., Bucholz, K. K., et al. (1997). Genetic and environmental contributions to variance in age at first sexual intercourse. Psychological Science, 8, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41, 231–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, D. T. A., Campbell, B., MacKillop, J., Modi, M., Dang, D., Lum, J. K., et al. (2007). Polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 and D2 receptor genes and reproductive and sexual behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 696–715.Google Scholar
  20. Emery, R. E., Waldron, M., Kitzmann, K. M., & Aaron, J. (1999). Delinquent behavior, future divorce or nonmarital childbearing, and externalizing behavior among offspring: A 14-year prospective study. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 568–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fagan, A. A., Horn, M. L. V., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in the associations between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science, 8, 115–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flannery, D. J., Rowe, D. C., & Gulley, B. L. (1993). Impact of pubertal status, timing, and age on adolescent sexual experience and delinquency. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Reiss, D. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on pubertal timing: Results from two national sibling studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 767–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112.Google Scholar
  27. Guo, G., & Tong, Y. (2006). Age at first sexual intercourse, genes, and social context: Evidence from twins and the dopamine D4 receptor gene. Demography, 43, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo, G., Tong, Y., & Cai, T. (2008). Gene-by-social context interactions for number of sexual partners among white male youth: Genetics-informed sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 114S, S36–S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guo, G., Tong, W., Xie, C., & Lange, L. (2007). Dopamine transporter, gender, and number of sexual partners among young adults. European Journal of Human Genetics, 15, 279–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallfors, D. D., Waller, M. W., Bauer, D., Ford, C. A., & Halpern, C. T. (2005). Which comes first in adolescence—sex and drugs or depression? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(3), 163–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpern, C. T., Kaestle, C. E., Guo, G., & Hallfors, D. D. (2007). Gene-environment contributions to young adult sexual partnering. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 543–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harden, K. P., Lynch, S. K., Turkheimer, E., Emery, R. E., D’Onofrio, B. M., Slutske, W., et al. (2007). A behavior genetic investigation of adolescent motherhood and offspring mental health problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 667–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harden, K. P., Mendle, J. E., Hill, J. E., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2008). Rethinking timing of first sex and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 373–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacobson, K. C., & Rowe, D. C. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationships between family connectedness, school connectedness, and adolescent depressed mood: Sex differences. Developmental Psychology, 35, 926–939.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., Jacomb, P. A., & Easteal, S. (2004). Association of adverse childhood experiences, age of menarche and adult reproductive behavior: Does the androgen receptor gene play a role? American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 125B, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2000). You don’t bring me anything but down: Adolescent romance and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 369–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, K., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Family relations in early childhood and reproductive development. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 17, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohler, H., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (2002). Between nature and nurture: The shifting determinants of female fertility in Danish twin cohorts. Social Biology, 49, 218–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kotchick, B. A., Schaffer, A., Miller, K. S., & Forehand, R. (2001). Adolescent sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 493–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lahey, B. B., & D’Onofrio, B. M. (2010). All in the family: Comparing siblings to test causal hypothesis regarding environmental influences on behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lam, T. H., Shi, H. J., Ho, L. M., Stewart, S. M., & Fan, S. (2002). Timing of pubertal maturation and heterosexual behavior among Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 359–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leitenberg, H., & Saltzman, H. (2000). A statewide survey of age at first intercourse for adolescent females and age of their male partners: Relation to other risk behaviors and statutory rape implications. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 203–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship context of “nonrelationship” sex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2000). The relationship context of contraceptive use at first intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 104–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marin, B. V., Coyle, K. K., Gomez, C. A., Carvajal, S. C., & Kirby, D. B. (2000). Older boyfriends and girlfriends increase risk of sexual initiation in young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Genetical, environmental, and personality factors influencing the age of first sexual intercourse in twins. Journal of Biosocial Science, 9, 91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Masten, A. S., Coatsworth, J. D., Neemann, J., Gest, S. D., Tellegen, A., & Garmezy, N. (1995). The structure and coherence of competence from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 66, 1635–1659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McCarthy, B., & Casey, T. (2008). Love, sex and crime: Adolescent romantic relationships and offending. American Sociological Review, 73, 944–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 11, 1811–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyers, J. M., Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (1991). Estimating genetic influences on the age-at-menarche: A survival analysis approach. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 39, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mezzich, A. C., Giancola, P. R., Lu, S. Y., Parks, S. M., Ratica, G. M., & Dunn, M. (1999). Adolescent females with a substance use disorder: Affiliations with adult male sexual partners. American Journal on Addictions, 8, 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miles, D. R., & Carey, G. (1997). Genetic and environmental architecture of human aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 207–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, W. B., Pasta, D. J., MacMurray, J., Chiu, C., Wu, H., & Coming, D. E. (1999). Dopamine receptor genes are associated with age at first sexual intercourse. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31(1), 43–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moffitt, T. E. (2005). The new look of behavioral genetics in developmental psychopathology: Gene-environment interplay in antisocial behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 533–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Monahan, K. C., & Lee, J. M. (2008). Adolescent sexual activity: Links between relational context and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mustanski, B. S., Viken, R. J., Kaprio, J., Pulkkinen, L., & Rose, R. J. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on pubertal development: Longitudinal data from Finnish twins at ages 11 and 14. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1188–1198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mustanski, B., Viken, R. J., Kaprio, J., Winter, T., & Rose, R. J. (2007). Sexual behavior in young adulthood: A population-based twin study. Health Psychology, 26, 610–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  63. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Raine, A. (2002). Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: A review. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 311–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rhee, S. I., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodgers, J. L., Bard, D. E., Johnson, A., D’Onofrio, B., & Miller, W. B. (2008). The cross-generational mother-daughter-aunt-niece design: Establishing validity of the MDAN design with NLSY fertility variables. Behavior Genetics, 38, 567–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rowe, D. C. (2001). Biology and crime. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  68. Rowe, D. C. (2002). On genetic variation in menarche and age at first sexual intercourse: A critique of the Belsky-Draper hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Scourfield, J., Van den Bree, M., Martin, N., & McGuffin, P. (2004). Conduct problems in children and adolescents: A twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 489–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seiffge-Krenke, I. J., Shulman, S., & Kiessinger, N. (2001). Adolescent precursors of romantic relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shulman, S., Walsh, S. D., Weisman, O., & Schelyer, M. (2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior, and depressive symptoms in adolescent males and females. Sex Roles, 61, 850–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Slutske, W. S., Heath, A. C., Dinwiddie, S. H., Madden, P. A. F., Bucholz, K. K., Dunne, M. P., et al. (1997). Modeling genetic and environmental influences in the etiology of conduct disorder: A study of 2, 682 adult twin pairs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 266–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spitz, E., Moutier, R., Reed, T., Busnel, M. C., Marchaland, C., Roubertoux, P. L., et al. (1996). Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphic analysis. Behavior Genetics, 26, 55–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spriggs, A. L., & Halpern, C. T. (2008). Timing of sexual debut and initiation of postsecondary education by early adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40, 152–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  78. Udry, J. R. (2003). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  79. Udry, J. R., & Cliquet, R. L. (1982). A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between ages at menarche, marriage, and first birth. Demography, 19, 53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Underwood, M. K., & Rosen, L. H. (2009). Gender, peer relations, and challenges for girlfriends and boyfriends coming together in adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 16–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Verweij, K. J. H., Zietsch, B. P., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2009). Shared aetiology of risky sexual behavior and adolescent misconduct: Genetic and environmental influences. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 8, 107–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woodward, L., & Fergusson, D. (1999). Early conduct problems and later risk of teenage pregnancy in girls. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 127–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wyatt, G., Durvasula, R. S., Guthrie, D., Lefranc, E., & Forge, N. (1999). Correlates of first intercourse among women in Jamaica. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 139–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Young, S. E., Smolen, A., Corley, R. P., Krauter, K. S., DeFries, J. C., Crowley, T. C., et al. (2002). Dopamine transporter polymorphism is associated with childhood externalizing behavior. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 114, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Population Research CenterThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations