Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 39, Issue 7, pp 720–735 | Cite as

The Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development: A Longitudinal Analysis of Confirmatory Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance

  • Edmond P. Bowers
  • Yibing Li
  • Megan K. Kiely
  • Aerika Brittian
  • Jacqueline V. Lerner
  • Richard M. Lerner
Empirical Research

Abstract

The understanding of positive development across adolescence rests on having a valid and equivalent measure of this construct across the breadth of this period of life. Does the Positive Youth Development (PYD) construct based on the Five Cs model have satisfactory psychometric properties for such longitudinal measurement invariance? Using longitudinal data derived from the 4-H Study of PYD, we assessed 920 youth (61.6% female) from a racially and ethically diverse sample (67.3% European American) who participated in three waves (Grades 8–10) of data collection. Building on prior findings that the Five Cs (i.e., Competence, Confidence, Connection, Character, and Caring) model of PYD was a robust measure that could be assessed comparably during early adolescence, we tested a hierarchy of second-order confirmatory factor analysis models to assess the extent to which PYD can be measured equivalently across middle adolescence. Evidence was found for strict measurement invariance across three measurement occasions, including equivalence of first-order and second-order factor loadings, equality of intercepts of observed variables, and equality of item uniqueness and disturbances of the first-order factors. These results suggest that PYD can be measured in the same way across measurement occasions, a prerequisite for the study of development. Implications for research and application of being able to measure PYD equivalently across adolescence are discussed.

Keywords

Positive youth development (PYD) Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) Longitudinal measurement invariance Adolescence 

References

  1. Armsden, G., & Greenberg, M. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people’s conceptions of the transition to adulthood’. Youth and Society, 29(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., Scales, P. C., & Blyth, D. A. (1998). Beyond the “village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 138–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. M. (1995). Strategies in testing for an invariant second-order factor structure: A comparison of EQS and LISREL. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Damon, W. (2004). What is positive youth development? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the big five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dukakis, K., London, R. A., McLaughlin, M., & Williamson, D. (2009). Positive youth development: Individual, setting and system level indicators. (Issue brief: Positive youth development indicators). Stanford, CA: John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B. C., Karbon, M., Smith, M., & Maszk, P. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Oxford, England: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud, A. (1969). Adolescence as a developmental disturbance. In G. Caplan & S. Lebovici (Eds.), Adolescence (pp. 5–10). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  19. Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
  20. Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1097–1149). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Harter, S. (1999). The construction of self: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Heck, K. E., & Subramaniam, A. (2009). Youth development Frameworks. [Monograph]. Davis, CA: 4-H Center for Youth Development, University of California.Google Scholar
  23. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1071–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeličić, H., Bobek, D., Phelps, E., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King, P. E., Dowling, E. M., Mueller, R. A., White, K., Schultz, W., Osborn, P., et al. (2005). Thriving in adolescence: The voices of youth-serving practitioners, parents, and early and late adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y., & Bowers, E. P. (2009). Positive youth development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol 1. Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 524–558). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Marsh, H. W., Gerlach, E., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., & Brettschneider, W. D. (2007). Longitudinal study of preadolescent sport self-concept and performance: Reciprocal effects and causal ordering. Child Development, 78(6), 1640–1656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, K. A., Lippman, L., & Brown, B. (2004). Indicators of child well-being: The promise for positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Special Issue: Positive Development: Realizing the Potential of Youth, 591, 125–145.Google Scholar
  31. Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phelps, E., Balsano, A. B., Fay, K., Peltz, J. S., Zimmerman, S. M., Lerner, R. M., et al. (2007). Nuances in early developmental trajectories of positive and problematic/risk behaviors: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 473–496.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Phelps, E., & Colby, A. (2002). Introduction. In E. Phelps, R. R. Furstenberg, & A. Colby (Eds.), Looking at lives: American longitudinal studies of the twentieth century (pp. 3–14). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of positive youth development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pittman, K., Irby, M., & Ferber, T. (2001). Unfinished business: Further reflections on a decade of promoting youth development. In Public/Private Ventures (Ed.), Youth development: Issues, challenges, and directions (pp. 17–64). Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  36. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Benson P. L., Scales, P. C, Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.). Theoretical models of human development. Volume 1 of Handbook of Child Psychology (6th edn). Editors-in-chief: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Schmitt, N., & Kulijanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2005). Structure and change in self-concept during adolescence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 37(2), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Small, S. A., & Rodgers, K. B. (1995). Teen assessment project (TAP) survey question bank. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  41. Susman, E. J., & Dorn, L. D. (2009). Puberty: Its role in development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol 1. Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 116–151). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Theokas, C., Almerigi, J. B., Lerner, R. M., Dowling, E. M., Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., et al. (2005). Conceptualizing and modeling individual and ecological asset components of thriving in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept: Vol II. Theory and research on selected topics. Rev. edn.. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zarrett, N., Peltz, J. S., Fay, K., Li, Y., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2007). Sports and youth development programs: Theoretical and practical implications of early adolescent participation in multiple instances of structured out-of-school (OST) activity. Journal of Youth Development, 2(1), 7–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edmond P. Bowers
    • 1
  • Yibing Li
    • 1
  • Megan K. Kiely
    • 1
  • Aerika Brittian
    • 1
  • Jacqueline V. Lerner
    • 2
  • Richard M. Lerner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Applied Research in Youth DevelopmentTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Lynch School of EducationBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations