Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 670–682 | Cite as

Relationships Between Level and Change in Family, School, and Peer Factors During Two Periods of Adolescence and Problem Behavior at Age 19

  • Charles B. FlemingEmail author
  • Richard F. Catalano
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
  • Robert D. Abbott
Empirical Research

Abstract

While prior research has examined family, school, and peer factors as potential predictors of problem behavior, less attention has been given to studying when these factors are most predictive of problems and if and when changes in these factors signal risk. Using annual data on a community sample of 1,040 individuals (47% female; 81% White), this study models growth in risk and protective factors during two developmental periods (Grades 5–8 and Grades 9–12) in order to predict substance misuse and crime at age 19. For protective factors of positive relationships with family and positive bonds to school, both the levels of these factors at Grade 5 and change between Grade 5 and Grade 8 predicted substance misuse and crime in early adulthood. Higher likelihoods of both forms of problem behavior also were predicted by increases in the risk factor of exposure to negative peers between 5th and 8th grade. In the late adolescent period, levels at 9th grade of all risk and protective factors examined predicted both substance misuse and crime. Also, increases in exposure to negative peers in late adolescence predicted greater likelihoods of both forms of problem behavior, while greater risk of substance misuse was predicted by decreases in school bonding and academic achievement, and greater risk of crime was predicted by worsening relationships with family. The results add to prior research by indicating that in addition to the level, change in risk and protective factors during these two stages of development can be signals of risk and are promising targets for intervention.

Keywords

Substance use Antisocial behavior Risk and protective factors 

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., Johnston, L. D., Bryant, A. L., & Merline, A. C. (2002). The decline of substance use in young adulthood: Changes in social activities, roles, and beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1987). Characterizing criminal careers. Science, 237, 985–991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, E. C., Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., & Haggerty, K. P. (2005, May). Discrete time survival mixture analysis of alcohol use initiation in the Raising Healthy Children project. Presented at the Society for Prevention Research Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (2003). Raising healthy children through enhancing social development in elementary school: Results after 1.5 years. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coffman, D. L., & Millsap, R. E. (2006). Evaluating latent growth curve models using individual fit statistics. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., et al. (1993). The science of prevention. A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48, 1013–1022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. R. (1988). Parent and peer factors associated with drug sampling in early adolescence: Implications for treatment. In E. R. Rahdert & J. Grabowski (Eds.), Adolescent drug abuse: Analyses of treatment research (DHHS Publication No. ADM 88–1523) (pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2000). Risk and protective factors influencing adolescent problem behavior: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 103–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Dusenbury, L., & Falco, M. (1995). Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott, D. S. (Ed.). (2000). Blueprints for violence prevention. Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  17. Farrington, D. P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. In M. Tonry & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research: Vol. 24. Youth violence (pp. 421–475). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (1999). Delinquency prevention using family-based interventions. Children and Society, 13, 283–303.Google Scholar
  19. Fleming, C. B., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Assessing the effects of a school-based intervention on unscheduled school transfers during elementary school. Evaluation Review, 25, 655–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fletcher, A. C., Steinberg, L., & Williams-Wheeler, M. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, 75, 781–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Foxcroft, D., Ireland, D., Lister-Sharp, D., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2003). Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: A systematic review. Addiction, 98, 397–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Galambos, N. L., Barker, E. T., & Almeida, D. M. (2003). Parents do matter: Trajectories of change in externalizing and internalizing problems in early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 578–594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaser, R. R., Van Horn, M. L., Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Measurement properties of the communities that care youth survey across demographic groups. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottfredson, D. C., Gerstenblith, S. A., Soule, D. A., Womer, S. C., & Lu, S. (2004). Do after school programs reduce delinquency? Prevention Science, 5, 253–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, D. C., & Wilson, D. B. (2003). Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science, 4, 27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. B., & Najaka, S. S. (2002). School-based crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 56–164). New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87–114). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Haggerty, K., & Cummings, C. (2006). Raising healthy children: School intervention strategies to develop prosocial behaviors. In M. J. Elias & H. Arnold (Eds.), The educator’s guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement: Social-emotional learning in the classroom (pp. 119–130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance-abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Battin-Pearson, S., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle social development intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 225–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1013–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herrenkohl, T. I., Maguin, E., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2000). Developmental risk factors for youth violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 176–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1988). Towards a general theory of crime. In W. Buikhuisen & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Explaining criminal behaviour: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 8–26). Leiden, Netherlands: E J Brill.Google Scholar
  35. Howell, J. C., Krisberg, B., Hawkins, J. D., & Wilson, J. J. (Eds.). (1995). A sourcebook: Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents’ monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74, 752–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 20, pp. 145–264). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Masten, A. S., Roisman, G. I., Long, J. D., Burt, K. B., Obradovic, J., Riley, J. R., et al. (2005). Developmental cascades: Linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Developmental Psychology, 41, 733–746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.), Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for prevention intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  45. Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes (Unpublished Paper).Google Scholar
  46. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  47. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1997). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide. (National Institutes of Health Publication Number 97–4212). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  48. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  49. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’ Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2000). Early elementary school-aged child attachment to parents: A test of theory and implications for intervention. Prevention Science, 1, 61–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social interactional approach: Vol. 4. Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  53. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1998). Antisocial boys. In J. M. Jenkins, K. Oatley, & N. L. Stein (Eds.), Human emotions: A reader (pp. 330–336). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Petrie, J., Bunn, F., & Byrne, G. (2007). Parenting programmes for preventing tobacco, alcohol or drugs misuse in children <18: A systematic review. Health Education Research, 22, 177–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stoolmiller, M. (2004). Antisocial behavior, delinquent peer association, and unsupervised wandering for boys: Growth and change from childhood to early adolescence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2005). Predicting developmentally harmful substance use. In T. Stockwell, P. Gruenewald, J. W. Toumbourou, & W. Loxley (Eds.), Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice (pp. 53–65). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S. G., & Ovesen-McGregor, K. E. (1990). Teacher interview: Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation–Revised (TOCA-R). In S. G. Kellam (Ed.), Johns Hopkins Prevention Center training manual. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  62. White, H. R., Fleming, C. B., Kim, M. J., Catalano, R. F., & McMorris, B. J. (2008). Identifying two potential mechanisms for changes in alcohol use among college-attending and non-college-attending emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1625–1639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles B. Fleming
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard F. Catalano
    • 1
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
    • 1
  • Robert D. Abbott
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Development Research GroupSchool of Social Work, University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations