Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 607–619 | Cite as

Involvement in Internet Aggression During Early Adolescence

  • Nicole E. Werner
  • Matthew F. Bumpus
  • Daquarii Rock
Empirical Research

Abstract

The current study examined concurrent and longitudinal predictors of early adolescents’ involvement in Internet aggression. Cross-sectional results (N = 330; 57% female) showed that the likelihood of reporting Internet aggression was higher among youth who spent more time using Internet-based technologies to communicate with friends and who were themselves targets of Internet aggression. Offline relational aggression and beliefs supportive of relational and physical aggression also predicted concurrent involvement in Internet aggression. We used longitudinal data (N = 150; 51% female) to distinguish between youth who were aggressive in traditional contexts only (i.e., school) from those who were aggressive both online and offline. These results indicated that youth who were aggressive both online and offline were older at the initial assessment, were targets of Internet aggression, and held beliefs more supportive of relational aggression than youth who were aggressive offline only. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Internet Aggression Social information processing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is based in part on the M.A. thesis project of the third author. Portions of this manuscript were also presented at the 2006 biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, CA. Special thanks to our co-principal investigator on the ISOP project, Dr. Laura Griner Hill, and to the numerous graduate and undergraduate students who worked on this study over the years. We would also like to thank the principals, teachers, and students who participated for their support of this project.

References

  1. Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 713–722. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9211-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckerman, L., & Nocero, J. (2003). High-tech student hate mail. The Education Digest, 68, 37–40.Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, K. M., & Li, A. K. F. (1995). Bully and victim problems in elementary school and students’ beliefs about aggression. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22, 153–165.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, J. (2003). New breed of bullies torment their peers on the internet. Education Week, 22, 6–7.Google Scholar
  5. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D. L., & Simon, T. R. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 341–362. doi: 10.1177/0272431699019003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burks, V. S., Laird, R. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). Knowledge structures, social information processing, and children’s aggressive behavior. Social Development, 8, 220–236. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00092.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: II Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 648–657. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi: 10.2307/1131945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crick, N. R., Werner, N. E., Casas, J. F., O’Brien, K. M., Nelson, D. A., Grotpeter, J. K., et al. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In D. Bernstein (Ed.), Gender and motivation, volume 45 of the Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 75–141). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. David-Ferdon, C., & Hertz, M. F. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging public health problem. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S1–S5. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Delveaux, K. D., & Daniels, T. (2000). Children’s social cognitions: Physically and relationally aggressive strategies and children’s goals in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 672–682.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E. (1980). De-individuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. Paoulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influences (pp. 1160–1171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation’s youth. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Retrieved July, 2003, from http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/Youth_Internet_info_page.html.
  16. Greenfield, P., & Yan, Z. (2006). Children, adolescents, and the internet: A new field of inquiry in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 42, 391–394. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. The Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hudley, C., Britsch, B., Wakefield, W. D., Smith, T., Demorat, M., & Cho, S.-J. (1998). An attribution retraining program to reduce aggression in elementary school students. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 271–282. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199807)35:3<271::AID-PITS7>3.0.CO;2-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hudley, C., & Graham, S. (1993). An attributional intervention to reduce peer-directed aggression among African-American boys. Child Development, 64, 124–138. doi: 10.2307/1131441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hudley, C., & Graham, S. (1995). School-based interventions for aggressive African-American boys. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 4, 185–195. doi: 10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80057-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huesmann, R. L. (1988). An information-processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13–24. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:1<13::AID-AB2480140104>3.0.CO;2-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huesmann, R. L., & Guerra, N. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408–419. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens. Washington, DC: PEW Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  26. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  27. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: PEW Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  28. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170. doi: 10.1177/0143034306064547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macgill, A. R. (2007). Parent and teenager internet use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  30. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57–75. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). MPlus user’s guide (4th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press (Wiley).Google Scholar
  34. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 148–169. doi: 10.1177/1541204006286288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro- and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1, 3–13. doi: 10.1023/A:1010019915400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2008). Latest trends: Who’s online. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564–575. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmitt, K. L., Dayanim, S., & Matthias, S. (2008). Personal homepage construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 496–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys’ play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755–1772. doi: 10.2307/1131467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail inorganizational communication. Management Science, 11, 1492–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 7–30. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00063-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., & Tynes, B. (2004). Constructing sexuality and identity in an online teen chat room. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 651–666. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wartella, E., Caplovitz, A. G., & Lee, J. H. (2004). From baby Einstein to leapfrog, from doom to the Sims, from instant messaging to internet chat rooms: Public interest in the role of interactive media in children’s lives. Social Policy Report, 18, 3–19.Google Scholar
  46. Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2004). Peer relationship influences on the development of relational and physical aggression during middle childhood: The roles of peer rejection and association with aggressive friends. Social Development, 13, 495–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00280.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Werner, N. E., & Nixon, C. (2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 229–243. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-4306-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finklehor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S51–S58. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004a). Online aggressors/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 45, 1308–1316. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004b). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 319–336. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zelli, A., Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., & Laird, L. D. (1999). The distinction between beliefs legitimizing aggression and deviant processing of social cues. Testing measurement validity and the hypothesis that biased processing mediates the effects of beliefs on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 150–166. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zimbardo, P. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole E. Werner
    • 1
  • Matthew F. Bumpus
    • 1
  • Daquarii Rock
    • 2
  1. 1.Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Gritman Medical CenterMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations