Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 1084–1095

Early Adolescents’ Social Standing in Peer Groups: Behavioral Correlates of Stability and Change

  • Jennifer E. Lansford
  • Ley A. Killeya-Jones
  • Shari Miller
  • Philip R. Costanzo
Empirical Research

Abstract

Sociometric nominations, social cognitive maps, and self-report questionnaires were completed in consecutive years by 327 students (56% girls) followed longitudinally from grade 7 to grade 8 to examine the stability of social standing in peer groups and correlates of changes in social standing. Social preference, perceived popularity, network centrality, and leadership were moderately stable from grade 7 to grade 8. Alcohol use and relational aggression in grade 7 predicted changes in social preference and centrality, respectively, between grade 7 and grade 8, but these effects were moderated by gender and ethnicity. Changes in social standing from grade 7 to grade 8 were unrelated to grade 8 physical aggression, relational aggression, and alcohol use after controlling for the grade 7 corollaries of these behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding links between social standing and problem behaviors during adolescence.

Keywords

Social preference Perceived popularity Network centrality Leadership 

References

  1. Aslund, C., Starrin, B., Leppert, J., & Nilsson, K. W. (2009). Social status and shaming experiences related to adolescent overt aggression at school. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 1–13. doi:10.1002/ab.20286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887–897. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00119-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bukowski, W. M., & Newcomb, A. F. (1984). Stability and determinants of sociometric status and friendship choice: A longitudinal perspective. Developmental Psychology, 20, 941–952. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.20.5.941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S., & Gariepy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cairns, R. B., Leung, M.-C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330–1345. doi:10.2307/1131650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cairns, R. B., Perrin, J. E., & Cairns, B. D. (1985). Social structure and social cognition in early adolescence: Affirmative patterns. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 339–355. doi:10.1177/0272431685053007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cillessen, A. H. N., Bukowski, W. M., & Haselager, G. J. T. (2000). Stability of sociometric categories. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 75–93). New directions for child and adolescent development series no. 88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coie, J. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–402). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, J. D. (1983). Continuities and changes in children’s social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–282.Google Scholar
  13. Coie, J. D., Terry, R., Zakriski, A., & Lochman, J. (1995). Early adolescent social influences on delinquent behavior. In J. McCord (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives (pp. 229–244). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman, L., & Cater, S. (2005). Underage ‘binge’ drinking: A qualitative study into motivations and outcomes. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 12, 125–136. doi:10.1080/09687630512331323521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social–psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cumsille, P. E., Sayer, A. G., & Graham, J. W. (2000). Perceived exposure to peer and adult drinking as predictors of growth in positive alcohol expectancies during adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 531–536. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, S., & Davis, J. (2007). Empowering bystanders in bullying prevention, Grades K-8. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  18. DeRosier, M. E., & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in the assessment of children’s peer relations. Child Development, 75, 1379–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dishion, T. J., & Owen, L. D. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38, 480–491. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (Eds.). (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  21. Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eder, D., & Kinney, D. A. (1995). The effects of middle school extracurricular activities on adolescents’ popularity and peer status. Youth & Society, 26, 298–324. doi:10.1177/0044118X95026003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliot, D. S., Ageton, S. S., & Huizinga, D. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills: Siegel.Google Scholar
  24. Elliot, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Franzoi, S. L., Davis, M. H., & Vasquez-Suson, K. A. (1994). Two social worlds: Social correlates and stability of adolescent status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 462–473. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frederickson, N. L., & Furnham, A. F. (1998). Sociometric classification methods in school peer groups: A comparative investigation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39, 921–933. doi:10.1017/S0021963098002868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (1998). Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 606–620. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henry, D. B., & Kobus, K. (2007). Early adolescent social networks and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 346–362. doi:10.1177/0272431607302005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jiang, X. L., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy, E. (1995). Correlates of perceived popularity among peers: A study of race and gender differences among middle school students. The Journal of Negro Education, 64, 186–195. doi:10.2307/2967241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LaBrie, J., Pedersen, E., & Earleywine, M. (2005). A group-administered timeline followback assessment of alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 693–697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. LaFontana, K., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581–603.Google Scholar
  34. Maassen, G. H., & Verschueren, K. (2005). A two-dimensional ratings-based procedure for sociometric status determination as an alternative to the Asher and Dodge system. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 192–212. doi:10.1353/mpq.2005.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191. doi:10.2307/2673207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morrow, M. T., Hubbard, J. A., Rubin, R. M., & McAuliffe, M. D. (2008). The relation between childhood aggression and depressive symptoms: The unique and joint mediating roles of peer rejection and peer victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 316–340. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children’s group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856–867. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.19.6.856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1984). A longitudinal study of the utility of social preference and social impact sociometric classification schemes. Child Development, 55, 1434–1447. doi:10.2307/1130013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. (2000). A comparison of confidential versus anonymous survey procedures: Effects on reporting of drug use and related attitudes and beliefs in a national study of students. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 35–54.Google Scholar
  40. Pettit, G. S., Clawson, M. A., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (1996). Stability and change in peer-rejected status: The role of child behavior, parenting, and family ecology. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 267–294.Google Scholar
  41. Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rose, A., Swenson, L., & Waller, E. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17–24. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandstrom, M. J., & Coie, J. D. (1999). A developmental perspective on peer rejection: Mechanisms of stability and change. Child Development, 70, 955–966. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schafer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 323–335. doi:10.1177/01650250544000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, K. H., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2002). Understanding high school student leaders: II. Peer nominations of leaders and their correlates. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 275–299. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00100-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shrum, W., & Cheek, N. H. (1987). Social structure during the school years: Onset of the degrouping process. American Sociological Review, 52, 218–223. doi:10.2307/2095450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. doi:10.1002/ab.20138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Gagnon, C. (1992). Peer rejection from kindergarten to grade 2: Outcomes, correlates, and prediction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 382–400.Google Scholar
  50. Zettergren, P., Bergman, L. R., & Wangby, M. (2006). Girls’ stable peer status and their adulthood adjustment: A longitudinal study from age 10 to age 43. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 315–325. doi:10.1177/0165025406072793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer E. Lansford
    • 1
  • Ley A. Killeya-Jones
    • 2
  • Shari Miller
    • 3
  • Philip R. Costanzo
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Child and Family PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Genomic MedicineDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  3. 3.RTI, Research Triangle ParkDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations