Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 747–756 | Cite as

Social Motives Underlying Antisocial Behavior Across Middle School Grades

Empirical Research

Abstract

The goal of the study was to examine whether social motives (social mimicry, mutual attraction, and unreciprocated attraction) predict changes in antisocial behavior across middle school grades. The 2,003 initial participants (55% girls) were drawn from a larger longitudinal study of urban public school students: 44% Latino, 26% African-American, 10% Asian, 9% Caucasian, and 11% multiracial. Analyses of peer nominations and teacher-rated behavior included five waves of data between the fall of sixth grade and the spring of eighth grade (n = 1,260–1,347 for longitudinal analyses). Supporting the social mimicry hypothesis, students who associated peer-directed aggression with high social status in the beginning of middle school engaged in elevated levels of antisocial conduct during the second year in the new school. Additionally, unreciprocated attraction toward peers who bully others in the beginning of middle school was related to increased antisocial behavior in the last year of middle school. No support was obtained for the mutual attraction hypothesis. The findings provide insights about possible social motives underlying susceptibility to negative peer influence.

Keywords

Antisocial behavior Aggression Peers 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-9911525) and the William T. Grant Foundation (99100463) awarded to Sandra Graham and Jaana Juvonen. We thank Drs. Sandra Graham, Amy Bellmore, and Adrienne Nishina for their feedback on the earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berndt, T. J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312–1329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children’s perceptions of friendships and other supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Gest, S., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). A brief method for assessing social development: structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the interpersonal competence scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 725–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., Winter, C. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, G. J., Boisjoly, J., Kremer, M., Levy, D. M., & Eccles, J. (2005). Peer effects in drug use and sex among college students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 375–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of friendships, network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Granic, I., & Dishion T. J. (2003) Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring a pathogenic attractor process. Social Development, 12, 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  13. Gutman, L. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43, 522–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Leonard, S., & Herzog, M. (2005). Exposure to externalizing peer in early childhood: homophily and peer contagion processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 267–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartup, W. W. (2005). Peer interaction: What causes what? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 387–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Juvonen, J., & Galván, A. (in press). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein, & K. A. Dodge, (Eds.), Peer influence processes among children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231–1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Juvonen, J., & Murdock, T. B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for the self-presentation tactics of early adolescents. Child Development, 66, 1694–1705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kellam, S, Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development & Psychopathology, 10, 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. La Fontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (1998). The nature of children’s stereotypes of popularity. Social Development, 7, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. La Fontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. (2003). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lahey, B. B., Gordon, R. A., Loeber, R., Southamer-Loeber, M., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Boys who join gangs: A prospective study of predictors of first gang entry. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 261–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moynihan, M. (1968). Social mimicry: Character convergence versus character displacement. Evolution, 22, 315–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mrug, S., Hoza, B., & Bukowski, W. M. (2004). Choosing or being chosen by aggressive-disruptive peers: Do they contribute to children’s externalizing and internalizing Problems? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 32, 53–65.Google Scholar
  30. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A., (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poulin, F., Dishion, T. J., & Haas, E. (1999). The peer influence paradox: Friendship quality and deviancy training within male adolescent friendships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 42–61.Google Scholar
  32. Roeser, R. W., & Eccles, J. (1998). Adolescents’ perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychological adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 123–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, J. L., Mitchell, C., et al. (1994). The impact of school transitions in early adolescence on the self system and perceived social context of poor urban youth. Child Development. Special Issue: Children and Poverty, 65, 507–522.Google Scholar
  34. Tremblay, R. E., Masse, L. C., Vitaro, F., & Dobkin, P. L. (1995). The impact of friends’ deviant behavior on early onset of delinquency: Longitudinal data from 6 to 13 years of age. Developmental and Psychopathology, 7, 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warren, K., Schoppelrey, S., Moberg, D. P., & McDonald, M. (2005). A model of contagion through competition in the aggressive behaviors of elementary school students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 283–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wentzel, K. R., McNamara Barry, C., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influence on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations