Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 564–580 | Cite as

Further Evidence of an Engagement–Achievement Paradox Among U.S. High School Students

Empirical Research

Abstract

Achievement, engagement, and students’ quality of experience were compared by racial and ethnic group in a sample of students (N = 586) drawn from 13 high schools with diverse ethnic and socioeconomic student populations. Using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), 3,529 samples of classroom experiences were analyzed along with self-reported grades. Similarities and differences in achievement, engagement, and quality of experience among white, black, Latino, and Asian students were examined. The most marked differences found were between black and white students. Consistent with several previous studies, an engagement–achievement paradox was found in which black students reported higher engagement, intrinsic motivation, and affect in classrooms, but lower GPA relative to white students. A similar engagement–achievement paradox was found for students from low SES communities compared to those from high SES communities. Analyses also revealed racial and ethnic differences in the relationship of engagement with on-task behavior and contextual factors. Being on-task when in classrooms had a more positive effect on the engagement of black students relative to white students. The contextual effect of being in school versus home or in public on engagement was also more positive for black students than white students. Contextual factors and measurement issues are emphasized in the interpretation of findings and suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Engagement Achievement Race/ethnicity Socioeconomic status High school 

References

  1. Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W., & Downey, D. B. (1998). Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review, 63, 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Asakawa, K. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). The quality of experience of Asian-American adolescents in academic activities: An exploration of educational achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 8, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumrind, D. (1987). A developmental perspective on adolescent risk taking in contemporary America. New Directions for Child Development, 37, 93–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bempechat, J., Li, J., & Holloway, S. D. (2007). Learner self-knowledge: An important link to self-regulation among low income European American and ethnic minority students. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, J. R. (2003). Race in the schools: Perpetuating white dominance? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18, 26–31.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, C. R., Grotevant, H. D., & Condon, S. M. (1983). Individuality and connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role-taking skill. New Directions for Child Development, 22, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, H., & Dorr, N. (1995). Race comparisons on need for achievement: A meta-analytic alternative to Graham’s narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 65, 483–508.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 175, 525–536.Google Scholar
  16. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 45–71). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Deci, E. L. (1996). Why we do what we do. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  20. Dotterer, A. M., McHale, S., & Crouter, A. C. (2007). Implications of out-of-school activities for school engagement in African American adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 36, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Downey, D. B., & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downey, D. B., von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). Retrieved on October 19, 2007, from http://www.casel.org/downloads/ASP-Full.pdf.
  24. Farkas, G., Sheehan, D., & Grobe, R. P. (1990). Coursework mastery and school success: Gender, ethnicity, and poverty groups within an urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 807–827.Google Scholar
  25. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk (No. NCES-93–470). Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  26. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonzales, N. A., Cauce, A. M., Friedman, R. J., & Mason, C. A. (1996). Family, peer, and neighborhood influences on academic achievement among African-American adolescents: One-year prospective effects. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 365–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
  29. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, S. (1994). Motivation in African Americans. Review of Educational Research, 64, 55–117.Google Scholar
  32. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hektner, J. M. (2001). Family, school, and community predictors of adolescent growth-conducive experiences: Global and specific approaches. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106, 349–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly, S. (2004). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larson, R. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larson, R. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social & Behavioral Science, 15, 41–56.Google Scholar
  42. Larson, R. W., Hansen, D. M., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42, 849–863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levesque, R. J. R. (2007). The ethnicity of adolescent research. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindstrom, L., Ulriksson, L., Arnegard, J., & Brenner, S.-O. (2005). Experience and achievement in secondary schools: An Experience Sampling Method and interview study. Unpublished manuscript, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  47. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.). (2005). Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184.Google Scholar
  49. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of mathematics and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705–738.Google Scholar
  50. Mickelson, R. A. (1990). The attitude–achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mulligan, C. B., Schneider, B., & Wolfe, R. (2000). Time use and population representation in the Sloan study of adolescents. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  52. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology, 4, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. National Center for Education Statistics (2003). National assessment of educational progress. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
  55. Newmann F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  56. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290.Google Scholar
  57. Oyserman, D., Gant, L., & Ager, J. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1216–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rathunde, K. (1993). Undivided interest and the growth of talent: A longitudinal study of adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 22, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rathunde, K. (1996). Family context and talented adolescents’ optimal experience in school-related activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 605–628.Google Scholar
  61. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Reeves, T. J., & Bennet, C. E. (2004). Census 2000 special reports: We the people: Asians in the United States. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Department of Commerce. Economic and Statistics Administration.Google Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rothstein, R. (2004). The achievement gap: A broader picture. Educational Leadership, 62, 40–43.Google Scholar
  65. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shernoff, D. J., & Hoogstra, L. (2001). Continuing motivation beyond the high school classroom. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 73–87.Google Scholar
  67. Shernoff, D. J., Knauth, S., & Makris, E. (2000). The quality of classroom experiences. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work (pp. 141–164). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  68. Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research 1990–2000. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smerdon, B. A. (1999). Engagement and achievement: Differences between African American and white high school students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 103–134.Google Scholar
  72. Spencer, M. B., & Markstrom-Adams, C. (1990). Identity processes among racial and ethnic minority children in America. Child Development, 61, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steinberg, L. D., Brown, B. B., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1996). Beyond the classroom : Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  75. Stevenson, D. L., Schiller, K. S., & Schneider, B. (1994). Sequences of opportunities for learning. Sociology of Education, 67, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1990). Beliefs and achievement: A study of black, white, and Hispanic children. Child Development, 61, 508–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Uekawa, K., Borman, K. M., & Lee, R. (2007). Student engagement in America’s urban high school mathematics and science classrooms: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. The Urban Review, 39(1), 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 121–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van Laar, C. (2000). The paradox of low academic achievement but high self-esteem in African American students: An attributional account. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yair, G. (2000). Educational battlefields in America: The tug-of-war over students’ engagement with instruction. Sociology of Education, 73, 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and Foundations, College of EducationNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations