Two Sides of the Same Coin? The Relations between Prosocial and Physically Aggressive Behaviors

Origina Paper

Abstract

The direct and indirect relations between six types of prosocial behavior and physical aggression were examined. Data were gathered from 252 college students (M age = 21.67 years; 184 women) who completed measures of sympathy, prosocial behavior, and physical aggression. Structural equation modeling revealed that sympathy fully mediated the relations between compliant prosocial behaviors and physical aggression, and partially mediated the relations between altruism and physical aggression and public prosocial behaviors and physical aggression. The findings suggest that the relations between prosocial behaviors and aggression are complex and that prosocial behavior should not be treated as a unitary construct.

Keywords

Prosocial behaviors Sympathy Aggression Adolescence Methodology 

References

  1. Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C, Regalia C (2001) Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 80:125–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batson CD (1998) Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology: Vol 2 (4th ed., pp. 282–316). McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson CD, Ahmad N, Tsang J (2002) Four motives for community involvement. J Soc Issues 58:429–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boxer P, Tisak MS, Goldstein SE (2004) Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 33:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Pastorelli C (2001) Prosocial behavior and aggression in childhood and pre-adolescence. In Bohart AC, Stipek DJ (eds) Constructive & Destructive Behavior: Implications for family, school, & society (pp. 187–203). American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlo G, Eisenberg N, Knight GP (1992) An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. J Res Adolesc 2:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlo G, Hausmann A, Christiansen S, Randall BA (2003) Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. J Early Adolesc 23:107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlo G, Raffaelli M, Laible DJ, Meyer KA (1999) Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression. Sex Roles 40:711–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlo G, Randall BA (2001) Are all prosocial behaviors equal? A socioecological developmental conception of prosocial behavior. In Columbus F (ed) Advances in psychology research, vol. III (pp 151–170). Nova Science, Hauppauge, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlo G, Randall BA (2002) The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 31:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlo G, Roesch SC, Melby J (1998) The multiplicative relations of parenting and temperament to prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescence. J Early Adolesc 18:266–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cialdini RB, Schller M, Houlohan D, Arps K, Fultz J, Eaman AL (1987) Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? J Pers Soc Psychol 52:749–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coie J, Dodge KA (1998) Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Damon W (Series ed), Eisenberg N (Vol. ed), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 779–862). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Coie J, Kupersmidt JB (1983) A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys’ groups. Child Dev 54:1400–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick NR, Grotpeter JK (1995) Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev 66:710–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crowne DP Marlowe D (1964) The approval motive. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis MH, Franzoi SL (1991) Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. J Res Pers 25:70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dodge KA (1983) Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Dev. 54:1386–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eagly AH, Crowley M (1986) Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychol Bull 100:283–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eberly MB Montemayor R (1998) Doing good deeds: An examination of adolescent prosocial behavior in the context of parent-adolescent relationships. J Adolesc Res 13:403–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenberg N (1986) Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  23. Eisenberg N (2003) Prosocial behavior, empathy, and sympathy. In Bornstein MH, Davidson L, Keyes CLM, Moore KA (eds) Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 253–265). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1998) Prosocial development. In Damon W (Series ed) & Eisenberg N (Vol. ed), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–778). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenberg N, Guthrie IK, Murphy BC, Shepard SA, Cumberland A, Carlo G (1999) Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Dev 70:1360–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberg N, Lundy T, Shell R, Roth K (1985) Children's justifications for their adult and peer-directed compliant (prosocial and nonprosocial) behaviors. Deve Psychol 21:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenberg N, Miller PA (1987) The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psycholo Bull 101:91–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eisenberg N, Shea CL, Carlo G, Knight GP (1991) Empathy-related responding and cognition: A “Chicken and the Egg” dilemma. In Kurtines WM, Gewirtz JL (eds) Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (pp. 63–88). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Eron LD, Huesmann LR (1984) The relation of prosocial behavior to the development of aggression and psychopathology. Aggressive Behav 10:201–211Google Scholar
  30. Fabes RA, Carlo G, Kupanoff K, Laible D (1999) Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior. 1. The role of individual processes. J Early Adolesc 198:5–16Google Scholar
  31. Feshbach S, Feshbach ND (1986) Aggression and altruism: A personality perspective. In Zahn-Waxler C, Cummings EM, Iannotti R (eds) Altruism and aggression: Biological and social origins (pp. 135–164). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Frey KS, Hirschstein MK, Guzzo BA (2000) Second Step: Preventing aggression by promoting social competence. J Emotional Behav Disord 8:102–112Google Scholar
  33. Gill KL, Calkins SD (2003) Do aggressive/destructive toddlers lack concern for others? Behavioral and physiological indicators of empathic responding in 2-year-old children. Dev Psychopathol 15:55–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grusec JE, Goodnow JJ, Cohen L (1996) Household work and the development of concern for others. Dev Psychol 32:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grusec JE, Goodnow JJ, Kuczynski L (2000) New directions in analyses of parenting contributions to children's acquisition of values. Child Dev 71:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haapasalo J, Tremblay RE, Boulerice B, Vitaro F (2000) Relative advantages of person- and variable-based approaches for predicting problem behaviors from kindergarten assessments. J Quant Criminol 16:145–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardy SA (2005) Religiosity and prosocial behaviors in adolescence: The mediating role of prosocial values. J Moral Edu 34:231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris JA, Rushton JP, Hampson E, Jackson DN (1996) Salivary testosterone and self-report aggressive and pro-social personality characteristics in men and women. Aggressive Behav 22:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hastings PD, Zahn-Waxler C, Robinson J, Usher B, Bridges D (2000) The development of concern for others in children with behavior problems. Dev Psycholo 36:531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hawley PH (2003a). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 49:279–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hawley PH (2003b). Strategies of control, aggression and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. J Exp Child Psychol 85:213–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hill CE (2004) Helping skills: Facilitating exploration, insight, and action (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Hoffman ML (1987) The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) Empathy and its development (pp. 47–80). Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model An Interdisciplinary Journal 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hughes C, White A, Sharpen J, Dunn J (2000) Antisocial, angry, and unsympathetic: “Hard-to-manage” preschoolers’ peer problems and possible cognitive influences. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 41:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iannotti RJ (1985) Naturalistic and structured assessments of prosocial behavior in preschool children: The influence of empathy and perspective taking. Dev Psycholo 21:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaukianen A, Björkqvist K, Lagerspetz K, Österman K, Salmivalli C, Rothberg S, et al. (1999) The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behav 25:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Knight GP, Fabes RA, Higgins DA (1996) Concerns about drawing causal inferences from meta-analyses: An example in the study of gender differences in aggression. Psycholo Bull 119:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kochanska G (1997) Mutually responsive orientation between mothers and their young children: Implications for early socialization. Child Dev 68:94–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kochanska G, Aksan N (1995) Mother-child mutually positive affect, the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development 66:236–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krueger RF, Hicks BM, McGue M (2001) Altruism and antisocial behavior: Independent tendencies, unique personality correlates, distinct etiologies. Psycholo Sci 12:397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lahey BB, Schwab-Stone M, Goodman SH, Waldman ID, Canino G, Rathouz PJ, et al. (2000) Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: A cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol 109:488–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Laible DJ, Carlo G, Raffaelli M (2000) The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment. J Youth Adolesc 29:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN (1974) The psychology of sex differences. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  55. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7:83–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Manning MA, Bear GG (2002) Are children's concerns about punishment related to their aggression? J Sch Psychol 40:523–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller PA, Eisenberg N (1988) The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/ antisocial behavior. Psychol Bull 103:324–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mussen P, Eisenberg N (2001) Prosocial development in context. In Bohart AC, Stipek DJ (eds) Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, & society (pp. 103–126). American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Donohue W, Yeater EA, Fanetti M (2003) Rape prevention with college males: The roles of rape myth acceptance, victim empathy, and outcome expectancies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 18:513–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ostrov JM, Keating CF (2004) Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Soc Dev 13:255–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parpal M, Maccoby EE (1985) Maternal responsiveness and subsequent child compliance. Child Dev 56:1326–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Persson GEB (2005) Developmental perspectives on prosocial and aggressive motives in preschoolers’ peer interactions. Int J Behav Dev 29:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pulkkinen L (1984) The inhibition and control of aggression. Aggressive Behav 10:221–225Google Scholar
  64. Pulkkinen L, Tremblay RE (1992) Patterns of boys’ social adjustment in two cultures and at different ages: A longitudinal perspective. Int J Behav Dev. 15:527–553Google Scholar
  65. Radke-Yarrow M, Zahn-Waxler C, Barrett D, Darby J, King R, Pickett M, Smith J (1976) Dimensions and correlates of prosocial behavior in young behavior. Child Dev. 47:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Snyder M, Ickes W (1985) Personality and social behavior. In Lindzey G, Aronson E (eds) Handbook of social psychology: vol. 2 (3rd ed., pp. 883–947). Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Staub E (1986) A conception of the determinants and development of altruism and aggression: Motives, the self, and the environment. In Zahn-Waxler C, Cummings EM, Iannotti R (eds) Altruism and aggression: Biological and social origins. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 135–164Google Scholar
  68. Staub E (2005) The roots of goodness: The fulfillment of basic human needs and the development of caring, helping in nonaggression, inclusive caring, moral courage, active bystandership, and altruism born of suffering. In Carlo G, Edwards CP (eds) 51st Annual Symposium on Motivation: Moral development across the lifespan. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  69. Strayer J, Roberts W (2004) Empathy and observed anger and aggression in five-year-olds. Soc. Dev. 13:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, Gagnon C, Piché C, Royer N (1992) A prosocial scale for the Preschool Behaviour Questionnaire: Concurrent and predictive correlates. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15:227–245Google Scholar
  71. Vitaglione GD, Barnett MA (2003) Assessing a new dimension of empathy: Empathic anger as a predictor of helping and punishing desires. Motivation & Emotion 27:301–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vitaro F, Gagnon C, Tremblay RE (1990) Predicting stable peer rejection from kindergarten to grade one. J Clin Child Psychol 19:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Webster-Stratton C, Reid MJ (2003) Treating conduct problems and strengthening social and emotional competence in young children: The Dina Dinosaur treatment program. J Emotional Behav Disord. 11:130–143Google Scholar
  74. Weinberger DA (1995) The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In Singer JL (ed) Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health, pp 337–386. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  75. Weinberger DA, Gomes ME (1995) Changes in daily mood and self-restraint among undercontrolled preadolescents: A time-series analysis of “acting out”. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr 34:1473–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zahn-Waxler C, Cummings EM, Iannotti R (1986) Introduction: Altruism and aggression: Problems and progress in research. In Zahn-Waxler C, Cummings EM, Iannotti R (eds) Altruism and aggression: Biological and social origins, pp 1–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.is graduate student in the Developmental Psychology program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Her research interests include positive social and moral behaviors in children and adolescents and methodology. Department of PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations