Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 100–108

Family Functioning and School Success in At-Risk, Inner-City Adolescents

  • Diane Annunziata
  • Aaron Hogue
  • Leyla Faw
  • Howard A. Liddle
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

The relation between family functioning and school success was examined in 211 at risk, African American, inner city adolescents attending middle school (grades 6–8). Interviews with adolescents and caregivers yielded data on family cohesion, parental monitoring, and school engagement; school records provided data on grade point average. Results showed that both family cohesion and parental monitoring predicted school engagement, but neither family characteristic predicted GPA. Important gender differences also emerged. For boys only, the relation between family cohesion and school engagement was stronger when parental monitoring was high. For girls only, the effects of cohesion and monitoring on school engagement were additive: girls with both high family cohesion and high parental monitoring were most likely to be engaged in school. These findings extend the research base on family protective factors for antisocial behavior in young adolescents. Implications for future examination of family process characteristics in high-risk adolescents are discussed.

KEY WORDS

family process school success at-risk adolescents gender differences 

REFERENCES

  1. Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. J. Early Adolesc. 11(1): 56–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks-Gunn, J., and Furstenberg, F. (1989). Adolescent sexual behavior. Am. Psychol. 44: 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, M. L. (1991). Social identity, peer relations, and academic competence of African-American adolescents. Educ. Urban Soc. 24: 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., and Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in high school. J. Adolesc. Res. 10: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dakof, G. A. (1996). Meaning and measurement of family: Comment on Gorman-Smith et al. (1996). J. Fam. Psychol. 10: 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Bruyn, E. H., Deković, M., and Meijnen, G. W. (2003). Parenting, goal orientations, classroom behavior, and school success in early adolescence. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 24: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dishion, T. J., and McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clin. Child and Fam. Psychol. Rev. 1: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dryfoos, J. G. (1990). Adolescents at Risk: Prevalence and Prevention. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., and Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In Damon, W., and Eisenberg, N. (eds.), Handbook of child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development. Wiley, New York, pp. 1017–1095.Google Scholar
  11. Finn, J. D., and Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J. Appl. Psychol. 82: 221–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fletcher, A. C., Darling, N. E., Steinberg, L., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). The company they keep: Relation of adolescents’ adjustment and behavior to their friends’ perceptions of authoritative parenting in the social network. Dev. Psychol. 31: 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florsheim, P., Tolan, P., and Gorman-Smith, D. (1998). Family relationships, parenting practices, the availability of male family members, and the behavior of inner-city boys in single-mother and two-parent families. Child Dev. 69: 1437–1447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., and Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74: 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garmezy, N. (1985). Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. In Stevenson, J. E. (ed.), Recent Research in Developmental Psychopathology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 213–233.Google Scholar
  16. Gorman-Smith, D., and Tolan, P. (1998). The role of exposure to community violence and developmental problems among inner-city youth. Dev. Psychopathol. 10: 101–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorman-Smith, D., Tolan, P. H., Zelli, A., and Huesmann, R. (1996). The relation of family functioning to violence among inner-city minority youths. J. Fam. Psychol. 10: 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, N. E., and Craft, S. A. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. J. Educ. Psychol. 95: 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linver, M. R., and Silverberg, S. B. (1997). Maternal predictors of early adolescent achievement-related outcomes: Adolescent gender as moderator. J. Early Adolesc. 17: 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maddox, S. J., and Prinz, R. J. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables. Clin. Child and Fam. Psychol. Rev. 6: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchant, G. J., Paulson, S. E., and Rothlisberg, B. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students’ perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychol. Sch. 38: 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason, C. A., Cauce, C. A., and Gonzales, N. (1997). Parents and peers in the lives of African-American adolescents: An interactive approach to the study of problem behavior. In Taylor, R. W., and Wang, M. C. (eds.), Social and Emotional Adjustment and Family Relations in Ethnic Minority Families. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 35–98.Google Scholar
  23. McLoyd, V. C. (1990). The impact of economic hardship on Black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Dev. 61: 311–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLoyd, V. C. (1998). The impact of poverty and low socioeconomic status on the socioemotional functioning of African-American children and adolescents: Mediating effects. In Taylor, R. D., and Wang, M. C. (eds.), Social and Emotional Adjustment and Family Relations in Ethnic Minority Families. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 7–34.Google Scholar
  25. Newcomb, M. D., and Bentler, P. M. (1998). Consequences of Adolescent Drug Abuse: Impact on the Lives of Young Adults. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Osborne, J. W. (1997). Race and academic disidentification. J. Educ. Psychol. 89: 728–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pittman, L. D., and Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2001). African American adolescent girls in impoverished communities: Parenting style and adolescent outcomes. J. Res. Adolesc. 11: 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richards, M. H., Miller, B. V., O’Donnell, P. C., Wasserman, M. S., and Colder, C. (2004). Parental monitoring mediates the effects of age and sex on problem behaviors among African American urban young adolescents. J. Youth Adolesc. 33: 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., and Sameroff, A. J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Dev. Psychopathol. 10: 321–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, J. L., Mitchell, C., Feinman, J., Yoshikawa, H., Comtois, K. A., Golz, J., Miller, R. L., Ortiz-Torres, B., and Roper, G. C. (1995). Development and validation of adolescent-perceived microsystem scales: Social support, daily hassles, and involvement. Am. J. Community Psychol. 23: 355–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sirin, S. R., and Rogers-Sirin, L. (2004). Exploring school engagement of middle-class African American adolescents. Youth and Soc. 35: 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sirin, S. R., and Rogers-Sirin, L. (2005). Components of school engagement among African American adolescents. Appl. Dev. Sci. 9: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smetana, J., and Chuang, S. (2001). Middle-class African American parents’ conceptions of parenting in early adolescence. J. Res. Adolesc. 11: 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steinberg, L. (with Brown, B. B., and Dornbusch, S. M.). (1997). Beyond the Classroom: Why School Reform has Failed and What Parents Need to Do. Touchstone, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., and Brown, B. B. (1992a). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. Am. Psychol. 47: 723–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., and Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Dev. 65: 754–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., and Darling, N. (1992b). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Dev. 63: 1266–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, R. D. (1996). Adolescents’ perceptions of kinship support and family management practices: Association with adolescent adjustment in African American families. Dev. Psychol. 32: 687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, L. C., Clayton, J. D., and Rowley, S. J. (2004). Academic socialization: Understanding parental influences on children's school-related development in the early years. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, R. D., and Lopez, E. I. (2005). Family management practice, school achievement, and problem behavior in African-American adolescents: Mediating processes. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 26: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tolan, P. H., Gorman-Smith, D., Zelli, A., and Huesmann, R. (1997a). Assessment of family relationship characteristics: A measure to explain risk for antisocial behavior and depression among urban youth. Psychol. Assess. 9: 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tolan, P. H., Guerra, N. G., and Montaini-Klovdahl, L. R. (1997b). Staying out of harm's way: Coping and the development of inner-city children. In Wolchik, S., and Sandler, I. (eds.), Handbook of Children's Coping: Linking Theory and Intervention. Plenum, New York, pp. 453–479.Google Scholar
  43. Vazsonyi, A. T., and Pickering, L. E. (2003). The importance of family and school domains in adolescent deviance: African American and Caucasian youth. J. Youth Adolesc. 32: 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, M. C., and Gordon, E. W. (1994). Educational Resilience in Inner-City America: Challenges and Prospects. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  45. Wehlage, G. G., and Smith, G. A. (1992). Building new programs for students at risk. In Newmann, F. M. (ed.), Student Engagement and Achievement in American secondary Schools. Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 153–181.Google Scholar
  46. Weist, M. D., Freedman, A. H., Paskewitz, D. A., Proescher, E. J., and Flaherty, L. T. (1995). Urban youth under stress: Empirical identification of protective factors. J. Youth Adolesc. 24: 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. J. Educ. Psychol. 89: 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wentzel, K. R., and McNamara, C. C. (1999). Interpersonal relationships, emotional distress, and prosocial behavior in middle school. J. Early Adolesc. 114–125.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, M. N. (1995). African American Family Life: Its Structural and Ecological Aspects. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Annunziata
    • 1
  • Aaron Hogue
    • 2
  • Leyla Faw
    • 3
  • Howard A. Liddle
    • 4
  1. 1.Hudson Valley Cerebral PalsyPattersonUSA
  2. 2.The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA)Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.National Clinical Assessment AuthorityLondonEngland
  4. 4.Center for Treatment Research on Adolescent Drug AbuseUniversity of Miami School of MedicineMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations