Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 339–351 | Cite as

Age and gender differences in adolescents’ reactions to conflict situations: Aggression, prosociality, and withdrawal

  • Marjaana Lindeman
  • Tuija Harakka
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Article

Abstract

In this study, we examined how aggression, prosociality, and withdrawal, as reactions to interpersonal conflict situations, manifest themselves in pre-, mid-, and late adolescence (N = 2594). The subjects filled out a questionnaire that contained a description of two everyday problem situations with a set of problem-solving strategies. The results showed that aggression develops curvilinearily and that both prosociality and withdrawal decrease with age. In addition, both direct and indirect aggression, as well as withdrawal, were found to be more typical among boys than among girls whereas, in late adolescence, prosociality was more typical among girls. The most often used strategy in preadolescence was prosociality and in midadolescence, aggression. In late adolescence, girls used prosocial and withdrawal strategies most whereas the most often used strategy among boys was aggression.

Keywords

Gender Difference Health Psychology Late Adolescence Problem Situation Conflict Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Archer, J., Pearson, N. A., and Westeman, K. E. (1988). Aggressive behavior of children aged 6–11: Gender differences and their magnitude. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 27: 371–384.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J., and Westeman, K. (1981). Sex differences in the aggressive behaviour of school children. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 20: 31–36.Google Scholar
  3. Asendorpf, J. B. (1990). Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human. Develop. 33: 250–259.Google Scholar
  4. Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., and Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggres. Behav. 18: 117–127.Google Scholar
  5. Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Ferguson, L. L., and Gariepy, J.-L. (1989). Growth and aggression: 1. From Childhood to early adolescence. Develop. Psychol. 25: 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., and Knight, G. P. (1992). An objective measure of adolescents’ prosocial moral reasoning. J. Res. Adolesc. 2: 331–349.Google Scholar
  7. Crick, N. R., and Ladd, G. W. (1990). Children’s perceptions of the outcomes of social strategies: Do the end justify being mean? Develop. Psychol. 26: 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darley, J. M. and Schultz, T. R. (1990). Moral rules: Their content and acquisition. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 41: 525–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 36: 49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Demorest, A. P. (1992). The role of social cognition in children’s social maladjustment. Soc. Cog. 10: 211–234.Google Scholar
  11. Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Develop. 51: 162–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenberg, N. (1990). Prosocial development in early and midadolescence. In Montemayor, R., Adams, G. R., and Gullotta, T. (eds.), From Childhood to Adolescence. A Transitional Period? Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., and Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Develop. Psychol. 27: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eron, L. D., Huesmann, R., Brice, P., Fischer, P., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). Age trends in the development of aggression, sex typing, and related television habits. Develop. Psychol. 19: 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson, T. and Rule, B. (1980). Effects of inferential set, outcome severity, and basis for responsibility on children’s evaluations of aggressive acts. Develop. Psychol. 16: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham, S., and Weiner, B. (1991). Testing judgments about attribution-emotion-action linkages: A lifespan approach. Soc. Cog. 9: 254–276.Google Scholar
  17. Guerra, N., G. and Slaby, R. G. (1990). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 2. Intervention. Develop. Psychol. 26: 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huesmann, L. R., and Eron, L. D. (1989). Individual differences and the trait of aggression. Eur. J. Pen. 3: 95–106.Google Scholar
  19. Hyde, J. S. (1984). How large are gender differences in aggression. A developmental meta-analysis. Develop. Psychol. 20: 722–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, S. (1993). Social behaviour in adolescence: The analysis of social interaction sequences. In Jackson, S., and Rodriquez-Tome’, H. (eds), Adolescence and Its Social Worlds, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Bjorkqvist, K., and Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females?. Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11-to 12-year-old children. Aggres. Behav. 14: 403–414.Google Scholar
  22. Ledingham, J., Younger, A., Schwartzman, A.-E., and Bergeron, G. (1982). Agreement among teacher, peer, and self-rating of aggression, withdrawal, and likability. J. Abn. Child Psychol. 10: 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loeber, R. (1982). The stability of antisocial and delinquent child behavior: A review. Child Develop. 53: 1431–1446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moskowitz, D. S., and Schwartzman, A. E. (1989). Life paths of aggressive and withdrawn children. In Buss, D. and Cantor, N. (eds.), Personality Psychology. Recent Trends and Emerging Directions. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Nurmi, J.-E. (1993). Adolescent development in an age-graded context: The role of personal beliefs, goals, and strategies in the tackling of developmental tasks and standards. Int. J. Behav. Develop. 16: 169–189.Google Scholar
  26. Paikoff, R. L., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (1990). Physiological processes: What role do they play during transition to adolescence? In Montemayor, R., Adams, G. R., and Gullotta, T. (eds.), From Childhood to Adolescence. A Transitional Period? Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Parke, R. D., and Slaby, R. G. (1983). The development of aggression. In Mussen, P. H. (ed), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. IV. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Perry, D., Perry, L. C., and Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Develop. 57: 700–711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Radke-Yarrow, M., Zahn-Waxler, C, and Chapman, M. (1983). Children’s prosocial dispositions and behavior. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. IV). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Rubin, K. H., Hymel, S., and Mills, R. S. L (1989). Socialibility and social withdrawal in childhood; stability and outcomes. J. Person, 57: 237–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Seiffge-Krenke, I. and Shulman, S. (1993). Stress, coping and relationships in adolescence. In Jackson, S., and Rodriquez-Tome, H. (eds.), Adolescence and Its Social Worlds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Stromquist, V. J. and Strauman, T. J. (1991). Children’s social constructs: Nature, assessment, and association with adaptive versus maladaptive behavior. Soc. Cog. 9: 330–358.Google Scholar
  33. Weiner, B. and Graham, S. (1989). Understanding the motivational role of affect: Lifespan research from an attributional perspective. Cog. Emot. 3: 401–419.Google Scholar
  34. Younger, A. J. and Boyko, K. A. (1987). Aggression and withdrawal as social schemas underlying children’s peer perceptions. Child Develop. 58: 1094–1100.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjaana Lindeman
    • 1
  • Tuija Harakka
    • 2
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations