Journal of World Prehistory

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–44 | Cite as

Distinguishing Wild Boar from Domestic Pigs in Prehistory: A Review of Approaches and Recent Results

  • Peter Rowley-ConwyEmail author
  • Umberto Albarella
  • Keith Dobney
Original Paper


New methods permit archaeologists to distinguish between wild boar and domestic pigs with greater confidence than has been hitherto possible. Metrical methods are the most commonly used; these are reviewed. Assemblages containing a wider range of measurements (as measured by the coefficient of variation [V]) than is found in one population suggest that two populations of different-sized pigs were present, probably indicating separate wild and domestic populations with little or no interbreeding. These assemblages, sometimes taken to indicate animals ‘intermediate’ between wild and domestic, are clear evidence of full domestication. Other traditional means of diagnosing domestication based on age at death (the killing of many young animals) and biogeography (the export of the animal beyond its natural range, especially to islands) are particularly problematic when applied to pigs. New methods include the frequency of Linear Enamel Hypoplasia, which may increase due to domestication-induced stress, the study of diet through isotopes and dental microwear, and the examination of population histories through ancient and modern DNA and geometric morphometrics. These are all promising but should not be considered in isolation: many problems remain.


Wild boar Domestic pig Domestication Methods Old World 



This paper is an outcome of the Durham Pig Project, funded by the Wellcome Trust (GR060888, and GR071037) and the Arts and Humanities Research Board (B/RG/AN1759/APN10977), and we thank both organisations. Simon Davis, Annat Haber and Akira Matsui provided useful references and much help. Terry O’Connor and an anonymous referee provided comments that have materially improved this paper.


  1. Albarella, A., Davis, S. J. M., Detry, C., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2005). Pigs of the ‘Far West’: The biometry of Sus from archaeological sites in Portugal. Anthropozoologica, 40, 27–54.Google Scholar
  2. Albarella, A., Dobney, K., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2009). Size and shape of the Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) with a view to the reconstruction of its Holocene history. Environmental Archaeology, 14, 103–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albarella, U., Manconi, F., Rowley-Conwy, P., & Vigne, J.-D. (2006). Pigs of Corsica and Sardinia: A biometrical re-evaluation of their status and history. In U. Tecchiati & B. Sala (Eds.), Archaeozoological studies in honour of Alfredo Riedel (pp. 285–302), Province of Bolzano, Bolzano.Google Scholar
  4. Albarella, U., Manconi, F., Vigne, J.-D., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2007). Ethnoarchaeology of pig husbandry in Sardinia and Corsica. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 285–307). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Albarella, U., & Payne, S. (2005). Neolithic pigs from Durrington Walls, Wiltshire, England: A biometrical database. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albarella, U., Tagliacozzo, A., Dobney, K., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2006). Pig hunting and husbandry in prehistoric Italy: A contribution to the domestication debate. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 72, 193–227.Google Scholar
  7. Altmann, M. (1960). The role of juvenile elk and moose in the social dynamics of their species. Zoologica, 45, 35–39.Google Scholar
  8. Andersen, J. (1953). Analysis of a Danish roe-deer population (Capreolus capreolus L.). Danish Review of Game Biology, 2, 127–155.Google Scholar
  9. Andrzejewski, R., & Jezierski, W. (1978). Management of a wild boar population and its effects on commercial land. Acta Theriologica, 23, 309–339.Google Scholar
  10. Bar-Oz, G., & Dayan, T. (1999). The Epipalaeolithic faunal sequence in Israel: A view from Neve David. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bar-Oz, G., Dayan, T., Kaufman, D., & Weinstein-Evron, M. (2004). The Natufian economy at el-Wad Terrace with special reference to gazelle exploitation patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biddick, K. (1984). Pig husbandry on the Peterborough Abbey estate from the twelfth to the fourteenth century AD. In C. Grigson, & J. Clutton-Brock (Eds.), Animals and archaeology: 4. Husbandry in Europe, British Archaeological Reports (International Series 227, pp. 161–177), Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Boessneck, J., Jéquier, J. P., & Stampfli, H. R. (1963). Seeberg Burgäschisee-Süd. Teil 3. Der Tierreste, Stämpfli, Bern (Acta Bernensia II).Google Scholar
  14. Church, M. J., Arge, S. V., Brewington, S., McGovern, T. H., Woollett, J., Perdikaris, S., et al. (2005). Puffins, pigs, cod, and barley: Palaeoeconomy at Undir Junkarinsfløtti, Sandoy, Faroe Islands. Environmental Archaeology, 10, 179–197.Google Scholar
  15. Clason, A. T. (1979). The farmers of Gomolava in the Vinča and La Tène period. Palaeohistoria, 21, 41–81.Google Scholar
  16. Clason, A. T. (1982). Padina and Starčevo: Game, fish and cattle. Palaeohistoria, 22, 141–173 and fiche.Google Scholar
  17. Collier, S., & White, J. P. (1976). Get them young? Age and sex inferences on animal domestication in archaeology. American Antiquity, 41, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cope, C. (1991). Gazelle hunting strategies in the southern Levant. In O. Bar-Yosef, & F. R. Valla (Eds.), The Natufian culture in the Levant, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor (Archaeological Series 1, pp. 341–358).Google Scholar
  19. Cucchi, T., Fujita, M., & Dobney, K. (2009). New insights into pig taxonomy, domestication and human dispersal in Island South East Asia: Molar shape analysis of Sus remains from Niah Caves, Sarawak. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 19, 508–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, S. J. M. (1981). The effects of temperature change and domestication on the body size of Late Pleistocene to Holocene mammals of Israel. Paleobiology, 7, 101–114.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, S. J. M. (1987). The archaeology of animals. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, S. J. M. (2003). The zooarchaeology of Khirokitia (Neolithic Cyprus), including a view from the mainland. In J. Guilaine, A. L. Brun, & O. D.-L. Brun (Eds.), Le Néolithique de Chypre (pp. 253–268). Ecole Française d’Athènes, Athens.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, S. J. M. (2005). Why domesticate food animals? Some zoo-archaeological evidence from the Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1408–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dayan, T., & Simberloff, D. (1995). Natufian gazelles: Proto-domestication reconsidered. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 671–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Degerbøl, M. (1939). Dyreknogler. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1939, 85–198.Google Scholar
  26. Degerbøl, M. (1942). Et knoglemateriale fra Dyrholm-bopladsen, en ældre stenalder køkkenmødding. In T. Mathiassen, M. Degerbøl, & J. Troels-Smith (Eds.), Dyrholm: En Stenalderboplads på Djursland, Det Kongelige Dansk Videnskabernes Selskab (Arkæologisk-Kunsthistorisk Skrifter 1, 1, pp. 77–136), Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  27. Dobney, K., Cucchi, T., & Larson, G. (2008). The pigs of Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific: New evidence for taxonomic status and human-mediated dispersal. Asian Perspectives, 47, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dobney, K., & Ervynck, A. (1998). A protocol for recording enamel hypoplasia on archaeological pig teeth. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 8, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dobney, K., & Ervynck, A. (2000). Interpreting developmental stress in archaeological pigs: The chronology of linear enamel hypoplasia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dobney, K., Ervynck, A., Albarella, U., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2004). The chronology and frequency of a stress marker (linear enamel hypoplasia) in recent and archaeological populations of Sus scrofa in north-west Europe, and the effects of early domestication. Journal of Zoology (London), 264, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dobney, K., Ervynck, A., Albarella, A., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2007). The transition from wild boar to domestic pig in Eurasia, illustrated by a tooth developmental defect and biometrical data. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 57–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dobney, K., Ervynck, A., & La Ferla, B. (2002). Assessment and further development of the recording and interpretation of linear enamel hypoplasia in archaeological pig populations. Environmental Archaeology, 7, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dods, R. R. (2002). The death of Smokey Bear: The ecodisaster myth and forest management practices in prehistoric North America. World Archaeology, 33, 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Driessen, M. M. (1992). Effects of hunting and rainfall on Bennett’s wallaby and Tasmanian pademelon populations (Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service Scientific Report 92/3). Hobart: Parks and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  35. Ducos, P., & Horwitz, L. R. K. (1998). The influence of climate on artiodactyl size during the late Pleistocene–early Holocene of the southern Levant. Paléorient, 23(2), 229–247.Google Scholar
  36. Dwyer, P. D. (1996). Boars, barrows, and breeders: The reproductive status of domestic pig populations in mainland New Guinea. Journal of Anthropological Research, 52, 481–500.Google Scholar
  37. Ekman, J. (1974). Djurbensmaterialet från stenålderslokalen Ire, Hangvar sn, Gotland. In G. Janzon (Ed.), Gotlands Mellanneolitiska Gravar, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm (Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Studies in North-European Archaeology 6, pp. 212–246).Google Scholar
  38. Elder, W. H. (1965). Primeval deer hunting pressures revealed by remains from American Indian middens. Journal of Wildlife Management, 29, 366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Eriksson, G. (2004). Part-time farmers or hard-core sealers? Vasterbjers studied by means of stable isotope analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Eriksson, G., Linderholm, A., Fornander, E., Kanstrup, M., Schoultz, P., Olofsson, H., et al. (2008). Same island, different diet: Cultural evolution of food practice on Öland, Sweden, from the Mesolithic to the Roman period. In A. Linderholm (Ed.), Migration in prehistory: DNA and stable isotope analyses of Swedish Skeletal Material. Department of Archaeology and Classics, Stockholm University (Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 10, pp. 1–54) (separately paginated).Google Scholar
  41. Ervynck, A., Dobney, K., Hongo, H., & Meadow, R. (2002). Born free? New evidence for the status of pigs from Çayönü Tepesi, Eastern Anatolia. Paléorient, 27, 47–73.Google Scholar
  42. Flannery, K. V. (1983). Early pig domestication in the fertile crescent: A retrospective look. In T. C. Young, P. E. L. Smith, & P. Mortensen (Eds.), The Hilly Flanks: Essays on the prehistory of Southwestern Asia (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 36, pp. 163–188). Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Flannery, T. F., & White, J. P. (1991). Animal translocation. National Geographic Research and Exploration, 7, 96–113.Google Scholar
  44. Fornander, E., Eriksson, G., & Lidén, K. (2008). Wild at heart: Approaching Pitted Ware identity, economy and cosmology through stable isotopes in skeletal material from the Neolithic site Korsnäs in eastern Central Sweden. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Frädrich, H. (1971). A comparison of behaviour in the Suidae. In V. Geist & F. Walther (Eds.), The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management (pp. 133–143). Morges, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  46. Garrard, A. N. (1984). The selection of south-west Asian domesticates. In J. Clutton-Brock, & C. Grigson (Eds.), Animals and archaeology: 3: Early herders and their flocks. British Archaeological Reports (International Series 202, pp. 117–132), Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Gentry, A., Clutton-Brock, J., & Groves, C. P. (2004). The naming of wild animal species and their domestic derivatives. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grenier, P. (1979). New regulations on moose hunting in Quebec. Canadian Wildlife Administration, 4, 28–31.Google Scholar
  49. Grigson, C. (1982). Porridge and pannage: Pig husbandry in Neolithic England. In M. Bell & S. Limbrey (Eds.), Archaeological aspects of woodland ecology. British Archaeological Reports (International Series 146, pp. 297–313), Oxford.Google Scholar
  50. Haber, A. (1961). Le sanglier en Pologne. In F. Bourlière (Ed.), Ecology and management of wild grazing animals in temperate zones (pp. 74–76). Morges, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  51. Haber, A., & Dayan, T. (2004). Analyzing the process of domestication: Hagoshrim as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 1587–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Haber, A., Dayan, T., & Getzo, N. (2005). Pig exploitation at Hagoshrim: A prehistoric site in the southern Levant. In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ conference, Durham) (pp. 80–85). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  53. Habu, J. (2004). Ancient Jomon of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hesse, B. (1982). Slaughter patterns and domestication: The beginnings of pastoralism in western Iran. Man (N.S.), 17, 403–417.Google Scholar
  55. Hesse, B. (1984). These are our goats: The origins of herding in west central Iran. In J. Clutton-Brock, & C. Grigson (Eds.), Animal and archaeology: 3. Herders and their flocks, British Archaeological Reports (International Series 202, pp. 243–264), Oxford.Google Scholar
  56. Higgs, E. S., & Jarman, M. R. (1969). The origins of agriculture: A reconsideration. Antiquity, 43, 31–41.Google Scholar
  57. Higham, C. F. W. (1968). Patterns of prehistoric economic exploitation on the Alpine Foreland. Viertaljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 113, 41–92.Google Scholar
  58. Holden, P. (1994). Wild Pig in Australia. Kenthurst, NSW: Kangaroo Press.Google Scholar
  59. Hongo, H., Anezaki, T., Yamazaki, K., Takahashi, O., & Sugawara, H. (2007). Hunting or management? The status of Sus in the Jomon period in Japan. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 109–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Hongo, H., Ishiguro, N., Watanobe, T., Shigehara, N., Anezaki, T., Long, V. T., et al. (2002). Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Vietnamese pigs: Relationships with Asian domestic pigs and Ryukyu wild boars. Zoological Science, 19, 1329–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hongo, H., & Meadow, R. H. (1998). Pig exploitation at Neolithic Çayönü Tepesi (southeastern Anatolia). In S. M. Nelson (Ed.), Ancestors for the pigs: Pigs in prehistory (MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology 15) (pp. 77–98). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
  62. Horwitz, L., Cope, C., & Tchernov, E. (1990). Sexing the bones of mountain-gazelle (Gazella gazella) from prehistoric sites in the southern Levant. Paléorient, 16(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Horwitz, L. K., Tchernov, E., Ducos, P., Becker, C., von den Driesch, A., Martin, L., et al. (2000). Animal domestication in the southern Levant. Paléorient, 25(2), 63–80.Google Scholar
  64. Imamura, K. (1996). Prehistoric Japan. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  65. Isaakidou, V. (2008). ‘The fauna and economy of Neolithic Knossos’ revisited. In V. Isaakidou & P. Tomkins (Eds.), Escaping the labyrinth: The Cretan Neolithic in context (Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 8) (pp. 90–114). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  66. Jarman, M. (1971). Culture and economy in the North Italian Neolithic. World Archaeology, 2, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jarman, M. R. (1976). Prehistoric economic development in sub-Alpine Italy. In G. de Sieveking, I. H. Longworth, & K. E. Wilson (Eds.), Problems in economic and social archaeology (pp. 375–399). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  68. Jarman, M. R., & Wilkinson, P. (1972). Criteria of animal domestication. In E. S. Higgs (Ed.), Papers in economic prehistory (pp. 83–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Jezierski, W. (1977). Longevity and mortality rate in a population of wild boar. Acta Theriologica, 22, 337–348.Google Scholar
  70. Jonsson, L. (1986). From wild boar to domestic pig—a reassessment of Neolithic swine of northwestern Europe. In L.-K. Königsson (Ed.), Nordic late quaternary biology and ecology, Striae 24, 125–129.Google Scholar
  71. Kelly, R. C. (1988). Etoro suidology: A reassessment of the pig’s role in the prehistory and comparative ethology of New Guinea. In J. F. Weiner (Ed.), Mountain Papuans (pp. 111–186). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  72. Krasinski, Z. A. (1978). Dynamics and structure of the European bison population in the Białowieża Primeval Forest. Acta Theriologica, 23, 3–48.Google Scholar
  73. Larson, G., Albarella, A., Dobney, K., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2007). Current views on Sus phylogeography and pig domestication as seen through modern mtDNA studies. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 30–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Larson, G., Albarella, A., Dobney, K., Rowley-Conwy, P., Schibler, J., Tresset, A., et al. (2007). Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15276–15281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Larson, G., Cucchi, T., & Dobney, K. (2011). Genetic aspects of pig domestication. In M. F. Rothschild & A. Ruvinsky (Eds.), The genetics of the pig (2nd ed., pp. 14–37). Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Larson, G., Cucchi, T., Fujita, M., Matisoo-Smith, E., Robins, J., Anderson, A. J., et al. (2007). Phylogeny and ancient DNA of Sus provides insights into Neolithic expansion in Island Southeast Asia and Oceania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(12), 4834–4839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Larson, G., Dobney, K., Albarella, A., Fang, M., Matisoo-Smith, E., Robins, J., et al. (2005). Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centres of pig domestication. Science, 307(11 March (2005)), 1618–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Legge, A. J. (1972). Prehistoric exploitation of the gazelle in Palestine. In E. S. Higgs (Ed.), Papers in economic prehistory (pp. 119–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Legge, A. J. (1990). Animals, economy and environment. In R. Tringham & D. Krstic (Eds.), Selevac: A Neolithic village in Yugoslavia (pp. 215–242). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  80. Legge, A. J., & Rowley-Conwy, P. A. (1988). Star Carr revisited: A re-analysis of the large mammals. Centre for Extra-Mural Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  81. Legge, A. J., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2000). The exploitation of animals. In A. M. T. Moore, G. C. Hillman, & A. J. Legge (Eds.), Village on the Euphrates (pp. 475–525). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Linderholm, A., Malmström, H., Brandström, M., Holmlund, G., Storå, J., Molnar, P. et al. (2008). What’s in a pot? Ceramic cultures and population genetics: the Pitted Ware culture vs. the Funnel Beaker culture. In A. Linderholm (Ed.), Migration in prehistory: DNA and stable isotope analyses of Swedish Skeletal Material. Department of Archaeology and Classics, Stockholm University (Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 10, pp. 1–16), Stockholm (separately paginated).Google Scholar
  83. Lindqvist, C., & Possnert, G. (1997). The subsistence economy and diet at Jakobs/Ajvide, Eksta parish and other prehistoric dwelling and burial sites on Gotland in long-term perspective. In G. Burenhult (Ed.), Remote sensing vol. I (pp. 29–90). Institute of Archaeology, University of Stockholm (Theses and Papers in North European Archaeology 13a), Stockholm.Google Scholar
  84. Lösch, S., Grupe, G., & Peters, J. (2006). Stable isotopes and dietary adaptations in humans and animals at Pre-Pottery Neolithic Nevalı Çori, Southeast Anatolia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Malcolmson, R., & Mastoris, S. (1998). The English pig: A history. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
  86. Malmström, H., Gilbert, T. P., Thomas, M. G., Brandström, M., Storå, J., Molnar, P., et al. (2009). Ancient DNA reveals lack of continuity between Neolithic hunter-gatherers and contemporary Scandinavians. Current Biology, 19, 1758–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Masseti, M. (2007). The economic role of Sus in early human fishing communities. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 156–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Matsui, A. (1996). Archaeological investigations of anadromous salmonid fishing in Japan. World Archaeology, 27, 444–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Matsui, A., Ishiguro, N., Hongo, H., & Minagawa, M. (2005). Wild pig? Or domesticated boar? An archaeological view on the domestication of Sus scrofa in Japan. In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ conference, Durham) (pp. 148–159). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  90. McCormick, F. (1999). Early evidence for wild animals in Ireland. In N. Benecke (Ed.), The Holocene history of the European Vertebrate Fauna: Modern aspects of research (Archäologie in Eurasien 6) (pp. 355–372). Berlin: Deutsches Archäologisches Institut.Google Scholar
  91. McCormick, F., & Murray, E. (2007). Knowth and the zooarchaeology of Early Christian Ireland (Excavations at Knowth 3). Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.Google Scholar
  92. McDiarmid, A. (1978). Roe deer management and stalking. Fordingbridge: Game Conservancy.Google Scholar
  93. McLellan, B. N., & Shackleton, D. M. (1988). A comparison of grizzly bear harvest data from Montana and southeastern British Columbia. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16, 371–375.Google Scholar
  94. Minagawa, M., Matsui, A., & Ishiguro, N. (2005). Patterns of prehistoric boar Sus scrofa domestication, and inter-islands pig trading across the East China Sea, as determined by carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis. Chemical Geology, 218, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nehring, A. (1889). Über Torfschwein und Torfrind. Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 1889, 363–369.Google Scholar
  96. Nilsson, S. (1822). Untitled section on animal bones, pp. 295–7 of: Bruzelius, M. Nordiska Fornlemningar från Skåne. Iduna, 10, 285–333.Google Scholar
  97. Nilsson, S. (1847). Skandinavisk Fauna. Första Delen: Däggdjuren (2nd ed.). Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
  98. Okumura, N., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., Hirai, K., Matsui, A., & Sahara, M. (1996). Geographic population structure and sequence divergence in the mitochondrial DNA control region of the Japanese wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax), with reference to those of domestic pigs. Biochemical Genetics, 34, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Oliver, W. L. R., Brisbin, E. L., & Takahashi, S. (1993). The Eurasian wild pig (Sus scrofa). In W. L. R. Oliver (Ed.), Pigs, peccaries and hippos (pp. 112–121). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  100. Österholm, I. (1989). Bosättningsmönstret på Gotland under Stenåldern (Theses and Papers in Archaeology 4). Institute of Archaeology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  101. Payne, S., & Bull, G. (1988). Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains. ArchæoZoologia, 2, 27–65.Google Scholar
  102. Pechenkina, E. A., Ambrose, S. H., Ma, X., & Benfer, R. A. (2005). Reconstructing northern Chinese Neolithic subsistence practices by isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1176–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Peters, J., Helmer, D., von den Driesch, A., & Saña Segui, M. (2000). Early animal husbandry in the northern Levant. Paléorient, 25(2), 27–47.Google Scholar
  104. Peters, J., von den Driesch, A., & Helmer, D. (2005). The upper Euphrates–Tigris basin: Cradle of agro-pastoralism? In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham) (pp. 96–124). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  105. Piper, P. J., Hung, H.-C., Campos, F. Z., Bellwood, P., & Santiago, R. (2009). A 4000-year-old introduction of domestic pigs into the Philippine Archipelago: Implications for understanding routes of human migration through Island Southeast Asia and Wallacea. Antiquity, 83, 687–695.Google Scholar
  106. Pira, A. (1909). Studien zur Geschichte der Schweinerassen, insbesondere derjenigen Schwedens. Zoologischen Jahrbüchern Supplement, 10(heft 2), 233–426.Google Scholar
  107. Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Redding, R. W., & Rosenberg, M. (1998). Ancestral pigs: A new (Guinea) model for pig domestication in the Middle East. In S. M. Nelson (Ed.), Ancestors for the pigs: Pigs in prehistory (MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology 15) (pp. 65–76). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
  109. Rosenberg, M., Nesbitt, R., Redding, R. W., & Peasnall, B. L. (1998). Hallan Çemi, pig husbandry, and post-Pleistocene adaptations along the Taurus–Zagros arc (Turkey). Paléorient, 24, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1986). Between cave painters and crop planters: Aspects of the temperate European Mesolithic. In M. Zvelebil (Ed.), Hunters in transition (pp. 17–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1993). Season and reason: The case for a regional interpretation of Mesolithic settlement patterns. In G. L. Peterkin, H. Bricker, & P. Mellars (Eds.), Hunting and animal exploitation in the later Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasia (Archaeological Papers 4) (pp. 179–188). Washington: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
  112. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1995). Wild or domestic? On the evidence for the earliest domestic cattle and pigs in South Scandinavia and Iberia. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 5, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1997). The animal bones from Arene Candide. Final report. In R. Maggi (Ed.), Arene Candide: Functional and environmental assessment of the holocene sequence (Memorie dell’Istituto Italiano di Paleontologia Umana, new series 5) (pp. 153–277). Rome: Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali.Google Scholar
  114. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1998). Cemeteries, seasonality and complexity in the Ertebølle of southern Scandinavia. In M. Zvelebil, L. Domanska, & R. Dennell (Eds.), Harvesting the sea, farming the forest: The emergence of Neolithic societies in the Baltic Region (pp. 193–202). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  115. Rowley-Conwy, P. (1999). Economic prehistory in southern Scandinavia. In J. Coles, R. M. Bewley, & P. Mellars (Eds.), World prehistory. Studies in memory of Grahame Clark (Proceedings of the British Academy 99) (pp. 125–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Rowley-Conwy, P. (2001a). Determination of season of death in European wild boar (Sus scrofa ferus): A preliminary study. In A. R. Millard (Ed.), Archaeological sciences 1997. Proceedings of the conference held at the University of Durham, 24 Sept 1997. British Archaeological Reports (International Series 939, pp. 133–139). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  117. Rowley-Conwy, P. (2001b). Time, change and the archaeology of hunter-gatherers: How original is the ‘Original Affluent Society’? In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherers: An interdisciplinary perspective (Biosocial Society Symposium Series 13) (pp. 39–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Rowley-Conwy, P. (2004). How the west was lost. A reconsideration of agricultural origins in Britain, Ireland and southern Scandinavia. Current Anthropology, 45(Suppl.), S83–S113.Google Scholar
  119. Rowley-Conwy, P., & Dobney, K. (2007). Wild boar and domestic pigs in Mesolithic and Neolithic southern Scandinavia. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 131–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Rowley-Conwy, P., Gourichon, L., Helmer, D., & Vigne, J.-D. (in press). Early domestic animals in Italy and southern France. In S. Colledge, J. Conolly, K. Dobney, K. Manning, & S. Shennan (Eds.), The origins and spread of domestic animals in Southwest Asia and Europe. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  121. Rowley-Conwy, P., & Layton, R. (2011). Foraging and farming as niche construction: Stable and unstable adaptations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 366(1566), 849–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Rowley-Conwy, P., & Storå, J. (1997). Pitted Ware seals and pigs from Ajvide, Gotland: Methods of study and first results. In G. Burenhult (Ed.), Remote sensing vol. I (Theses and Papers in North European Archaeology 13a) (pp. 113–127), Institute of Archaeology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  123. Rowley-Conwy, P., & Vostretsov, Y. I. (2009). Yankovsky economics: Animal bones from 1st millennium BC settlements in Primorye, Russian Far East. Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnology of Eurasia, 37, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rütimeyer, L. (1860). Untersuchung der Tierreste aus den Pfahlbauten der Schweiz. Mitteilungen der Antiquarischen Gesellschaft in Zürich, 13(part 2, section 2), 31–72.Google Scholar
  125. Rütimeyer, L. (1862). Die Fauna der Pfahlbauten der Schweiz, Bürkli, Zürich (Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften).Google Scholar
  126. Rütimeyer, L. (1864). Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Torfscheins. Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel, 4, 139–186.Google Scholar
  127. Sillitoe, P. (2007). Pigs in the New Guinea Highlands: An ethnographic example. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 Years of interaction (pp. 330–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Steenstrup, J. J. S. (1851). Beretning om Udbyttet af nogle ved Isefjordens Kyster og i Jylland sidste Sommer anstillede geologisk–antiquariske Undersögelser angaaende Landets ældste Natur- og Cultur-Forhold. Oversigt over det kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger, 1851, 1–31.Google Scholar
  129. Steenstrup, J. J. S. (1861). Forskiellen imellem urinvaanernes (Steenalderens) kultur her i Norden og i Schweiz. In Forhandlinger ved de Skandinaviske Naturforskerers Ottende Møde, i Kiøbenhavn fra den 8de til den 14de Juli 1860 (pp. 593–598). Gyldendal, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  130. Swadling, P., & Hide, R. (2005). Changing landscape and social interaction: Looking at agricultural history from a Sepik-Ramu perspective. In A. Pawley, R. Attenborough, J. Golson, & R. Hide (Eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples (pp. 289–327). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  131. Van Vuren, D., & Bray, M. P. (1986). Population dynamics of bison in the Henry Mountains, Utah. Journal of Mammalogy, 67, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Vigne, J.-D. (1988). Les Mammifères Post-Glaciaires de Corse. Étude Archéozoologique (XXVIe supplément à Gallia Préhistoire), CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
  133. Vigne, J.-D., Carrère, I., Briois, F., & Guilaine, J. (2011). The early process of mammal domestication in the Near East: New evidence from the Pre-Neolithic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic in Cyprus. Current Anthropology, 52(Supplement 4), S255–S271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Vigne, J.-D., Zazzo, A., Saliège, J.-F., Polplin, F., Guilaine, J., & Simmons, A. (2009). Pre-Neolithic wild boar management and introduction to Cyprus more than 11,400 years ago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16135–16138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. von den Driesch, A. E. (1976). A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites (Peabody Museum Bulletin 1). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.Google Scholar
  136. von den Driesch, A. E., & Boessneck, J. (1976). Die Fauna vom Castro do Zambujal. In A. von den Driesch, & J. Boessneck (Eds.), Studien über frühe Tierknochenfunde von der Iberischen Halbinsel 5 (pp. 4–129). Institut für Palaeoanatomie, Domestikationsforschung und Geschichte der Tiermedizin der Universität München.Google Scholar
  137. Ward, J., & Mainland, I. (1999). Microwear in modern rooting and stall-fed pigs: The potential of dental microwear analysis for exploring pig diet and management in the past. Environmental Archaeology, 4, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Warman, S. (2005). Two novel methods for the study of dental morphological variation in Sus scrofa, in order to identify separate breeding groups within archaeological assemblages. In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham) (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  139. Watanobe, T., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., Takamiya, H., Matsui, A., & Hongo, H. (2002). Prehistoric introduction of domestic pigs onto the Okinawa Islands: Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 55, 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Watanobe, T., Okumura, N., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., Matsui, A., Sahara, M., et al. (1999). Genetic relationship and distribution of the Japanese wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax) and Ryukyu wild boar (Sus scrofa riukiuanus) analysed by mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1509–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wilkie, T., Mainland, I., Albarella, A., Dobney, K., & Rowley-Conwy, P. (2007). A dental microwear study of pig diet and management in Iron Age, Romano-British, Anglo-Scandinavian, and medieval contexts in England. In A. Albarella, K. Dobney, A. Ervynck, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Pigs and humans: 10,000 years of interaction (pp. 241–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Winge, H. (1900). Knogler af Dyr. In A. P. Madsen, S. Müller, C. Neergaard, C. G. J. Petersen, E. Rostrup, K. J. V. Steenstrup, et al. (Eds.), Affaldsdynger fra Stenalderen i Danmark (pp. 81–89, 102–103, 110–111, 121–122, 129–132, 144–147, 158–163, 171–172, and 178–191). Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
  143. Yamazaki, K., Takahashi, O., Sugawara, H., Ishiguro, N., & Endo, H. (2005). Wild boar remains from the Neolithic (Jomon Period) sites on the Izu Islands and in Hokkaido Island, Japan. In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham) (pp. 160–176). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  144. Yuan, J., & Flad, R. K. (2002). Pig domestication in Ancient China. Antiquity, 76, 723–732.Google Scholar
  145. Zeder, M. (2001). A metrical analysis of a collection of modern goats (Capra hircus aegagrus and C. h. hircus) from Iran and Iraq: Implications for the study of caprine domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Zeder, M. A. (2005). A view from the Zagros: New perspectives on livestock domestication in the Fertile Crescent. In J.-D. Vigne, J. Peters, & D. Helmer (Eds.), The first steps of animal domestication: New archaeological approaches (Proceedings of the 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham) (pp. 125–146). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  147. Zeder, M. A. (2006). A critical assessment of markers of initial domestication in goats (Capra hircus). In M. A. Zeder, D. G. Bradley, E. Emshwiller, & B. D. Smith (Eds.), Documenting domestication: New genetic and archaeological paradigms (pp. 181–208). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  148. Zeder, M. A. (2008). Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(33), 11597–11604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Zeder, M. A., & Hesse, B. (2000). The initial domestication of goats (Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 years ago. Science, 287, 2254–2257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Zvelebil, M. (1995). Hunting, gathering, or husbandry? Management of food resources by the late Mesolithic communities of temperate Europe. MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, 12(Supplement), 79–104.Google Scholar
  151. Zvelebil, M. (2008). Innovating hunter-gatherers: The Mesolithic of the Baltic. In G. Bailey & P. Spikins (Eds.), Mesolithic Europe (pp. 18–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Rowley-Conwy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Umberto Albarella
    • 2
  • Keith Dobney
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ArchaeologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations