Advertisement

Journal of World Prehistory

, Volume 24, Issue 2–3, pp 161–174 | Cite as

A River Runs Through It: Landscape and the Evolution of Bronze Age Networks in the Carpathian Basin

  • John M. O’SheaEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The homogeneous and circumscribed character of the Carpathian Basin makes it an ideal setting for examining the interplay of topography and resource distribution in the development of Bronze Age social networks. Such networks include both systems of settlement and land use, and the patterns of interconnection between communities and regions that facilitate trade and exchange. Drawing on new excavations and increasingly common radiocarbon dates within the region, the alteration in these networks from earlier Copper Age and Neolithic patterns can be traced. It is suggested that the substantial river systems of the region provided the principal axes for the movement of goods during the Bronze Age and that control of these water routes was contested among neighboring communities and polities. It is further argued that contrastive overland trade connections also developed which, at least initially, transported distinct materials. Later, these overland connections undermined and superseded the pre-existing riverine systems.

Keywords Maros Hungarian archaeology Romanian archaeology 

References

  1. Bankoff, H., & Winter, F. (1982). The Morava valley project in Yugoslavia: Preliminary report, 1977–1980. Journal of Field Archaeology, 9, 149–164.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, C. (2006). The evolution of long distance trade relationships across the LBA/Iron Age Transition on the Northern Levantine coast: Crisis, continuity, and change, BAR International S-2574, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Biro, K. (1998). Stones, numbers, history? The utilization of lithic raw materials in the Middle and Late Neolithic of Hungary. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 17(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogdanović, M. (1996). Mittelserbien in der Bronzezeit und die Vattina-Kultur. In N. Tasić (Ed.), The Yugoslav Danube basin and the neighbouring regions in the 2nd millennium B.C (pp. 97–108). Belgrade: Vršac.Google Scholar
  5. Bökönyi, S. (1974). History of domestic mammals in central and eastern Europe. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  6. Bóna, I. (1965). The peoples of southern origin of the early Bronze Age in Hungary. Alba Regia, 4–5, 17–63.Google Scholar
  7. Bóna, I. (1975). Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und ihre südöstlichen Beziehungen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, R. (1990). The passage of arms: An archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoards and votive deposits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Childe, V. (1939). The dawn of European civilization. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  10. Ciugudean, H. (1996). Epoca Timpurie a Bronzului în Centrul şi Sud-Vestul Transilvaniei. Bucharest: Institutul Român de Tracologie Bibliotheca Thracologica XIII.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, D. (Ed.). (1977). Spatial archaeology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davison, K., Dolukhanov, P., Sarson, G., & Shukurov, A. (2006). The role of waterways in the spread of the Neolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(5), 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deák, J. (2005). Landscape ecological researches in the western Marosszög (Hungary). Acta Climatologica et Chorologica. Universitatis Szegediensis, 38–39, 33–46.Google Scholar
  14. Draşovean, F. (Ed.) (1999). Repertoriul arheologic al Mureşului Inferior: Judeţul Arad. Timişoara: Bibliotheca Historica et Archaeologica Banatica XXIV.Google Scholar
  15. Farkas, G. Y., & Lipták, P. (1971). Physical anthropological examination of a cemetery in Mokrin from the Early Bronze Age. In M. Girić (Ed.), Mokrin The Early Bronze Age Necropolis I (Vol. 11, pp. 239–271). Belgrade: Narodni Musej, Kikinda, Dissertationes et Monographie.Google Scholar
  16. Foltiny, I. (1941). Das Bronzezeitliche gräberfeld in Szöreg, Dolgozotok, 17, Szeged.Google Scholar
  17. Girić, M. (1989). Ostojićevo, ein bronzezeitliches gräberfeld. Praehistorica XV–XIV, Prague.Google Scholar
  18. Gogâltan, F. (1996). About the early Bronze Age in the Romanian Banat. In N. Tasić (Ed.), The Yugoslav Danube basin and the neighbouring regions in the 2nd millennium B.C (pp. 43–68). Belgrade: Vršac.Google Scholar
  19. Gogâltan, F. (1999). Bronzul Timpuriu Şi Mijlociu În Banatul Românesc Şi Pe Cursul Inferior Al Mureşului: Cronologia Şi Descoperirile De Metal. Timişoara: Editura Orizonturi Universitare.Google Scholar
  20. Hodder, I. (2000). Agency and individuals in long-term processes. In M. Dobres & J. Robb (Eds.), Agency in archaeology (pp. 21–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hodder, I., & Orton, C. (1976). Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Howey, M. (2007). Using multi-criteria cost surface analysis to explore past regional landscapes: A case study of ritual activity and social interaction in Michigan AD 1200–1600. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1830–1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jocić, M. (2004). Prehistory of the Nis region. In D. Davidov & D. Pesic (Eds.), Archaeological treasures of Nis from the Neolithic to the Middle Ages (pp. 77–87). Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. Jovanović, B. (1986). Early metallurgy in Yugoslavia. In R. Maddin (Ed.), The beginning of the use of metals and alloys (pp. 69–79). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kalicz-Schreiber, R. (1997). Kora bronzkori temetkezések a Csepel-Sziget keleti partjan. Budapest Régiségei, 31, 177–197.Google Scholar
  26. Kiss, T., & Sipos, G. (2007). Braid-scale channel geometry changes in a sand-bedded river: Significance of low stages. Geomorphology, 84, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kovács, T. (1977). The Bronze Age in Hungary. Budapest: Corvina Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kovács, T. (1988). Review of the Bronze Age settlement research during the past one and a half centuries in Hungary. In T. Kovács & I. Stanczik (Eds.), Bronze Age tell settlements on the Great Hungarian plain 1. Budapest: Inventaria Praehistorica Hungariae.Google Scholar
  29. Lovis, W. (2008). Space, information and knowledge: Ethnocartography and North American boreal forest hunger-gatherers. Paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology meeting, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  30. Machnik, J. (1991). The earliest Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin. Department of Archaeological Sciences, Bradford University.Google Scholar
  31. Michelaki, K. (2008). Making pots and potters in the Bronze Age Maros villages of Kiszombor Új-Élet and Klárafalva Hajdova. Cambridge Archaeology Journal, 18(3), 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mozsolics, A. (1985). Bronzefunde aus Ungarn. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  33. Nicodemus, A. (2008). Summary faunal report. In O’Shea, J. and A. Barker, Report on archaeological investigations at Pecica ‘Şanţul Mare’ 2008 Campaign. Bucharest: Report to Romanian Ministry of Culture.Google Scholar
  34. Nicodemus, A., & Kovács, Z. S. (in press). Early Copper Age animal economies of the Great Hungarian Plain. In W. Parkinson, A. Gyucha, & R. Yerkes (Eds.), Bikeri: Two Copper Age villages on the Great Hungarian Plain. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Norder, J. (2003). Marking place and creating space in Northern Algonquian landscapes: The rock-art of the Lake of the Woods region, Ontario. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  36. O’Shea, J. (1992). A radiocarbon-based chronology for the Maros group of southeast Hungary. Antiquity, 66(250), 97–102.Google Scholar
  37. O’Shea, J. (1996). Villagers of the Maros: A portrait of an early Bronze Age Society. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  38. O’Shea, J., Barker, A., Nicodemus, A., Sherwood, S., & Szentmiklosi, A. (2006). Archaeological investigations at Pecica ‘Şanţul Mare’: The 2006 Campaign. Analele Banatului, S. N., Arheologie–Istorie, XIV(1), 211–228.Google Scholar
  39. O’Shea, J., & Milner, C. (2002). Material indicators of territory, identity, and interaction in a prehistoric tribal system. In W. Parkinson (Ed.), The archaeology of tribal societies (pp. 200–226). Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory Archaeological Series 15.Google Scholar
  40. O’Shea, J. (Ed.) (n.d.). The Villages of the Maros: Excavations at Klárafalva Hajdova and Kiszombor Új Élet. Memoir of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, in prep.Google Scholar
  41. Papalas, C. (2008). Bronze Age metallurgy of the Eastern Carpathian Basin: A holistic exploration. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  42. Pare, C. (Ed.). (1997). Metals make the world go round: The supply and circulation of metals in Bronze Age Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  43. Parkinson, W. (2006). The social organization of early Copper Age tribes on the great Hungarian Plain. BAR International S1573, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Patay, P. (1978). Das Kupferzeitliche Gräberfeld von Tiszavalk-Kenderföld. Archaeologici Hungariae. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: Fontes.Google Scholar
  45. Raczky, P., Hertelendi, E., & Veres, M. (1994). La datation absolue des cultures des tells de l’âge du bronze en Hongrie. In I. Bóna & P. Raczky (Eds.), Le bel âge du bronze en Hongrie. Pytheas, Budapest: Centre archéologique européen du Mont-Beuvray.Google Scholar
  46. Schalk, E. (1998). Ores, mining and metal production in the western Carpathians and their association from the Bronze Age until the Medieval period. In B. Häsel (Ed.), Mensch und Umwelt in der Bronzezeit Europas (pp. 257–260). Kiel: Oetker-Voges Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Selincourt, A. (trans.) (1981). Herodotus: The histories. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  48. Sherratt, A. (1976). Resources, technology and trade. In G. Sieveking, I. Longworth, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Problems in economic and social archaeology (pp. 557–581). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  49. Sherratt, A. (1982). The development of Neolithic and Copper Age settlement in the great Hungarian Plain, Part 1: The regional setting. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 1(3), 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sherratt, A. (1987). Patterns of trade and contact in Neolithic Europe. In G. Sieveking & M. Newcomer (Eds.), The human uses of flint and chert (pp. 193–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Stojić, M. (1996). Le Bassin de la Morava à l’âge de bronze et à la période de transition de l’âge de bronze à celui de fer. In N. Tasić (Ed.), The Yugoslav Danube basin and the neighbouring regions in the 2nd millennium B.C. (pp. 247–256). Belgrade: Vršac.Google Scholar
  52. Tasić, N. (1984). Die Vatin-Kultur. In N. Tasić (Ed.), Kulturen der Frühbronzezeit das Karpatenbeckens und Nordbalkans (pp. 59–82). Belgrade: Balkanolośki Institut Sanu.Google Scholar
  53. Trogmayer, O. (1975). Das Bronzezeitliche Gräberfeld Bei Tápé, Fontes Archaeologici Hungariae. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  54. Westerdahl, C. (Ed.) (2006). The significance of portages. Oxford: BAR International S 1499.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museum of AnthropologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations