Advertisement

Spatial sorting of innovative firms and heterogeneous effects of agglomeration on innovation in Germany

  • Annekatrin Niebuhr
  • Jan Cornelius PetersEmail author
  • Alex Schmidke
Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

We examine the effects of agglomeration, differentiating between urbanization and localization economies, on four distinct types of innovation in manufacturing and services. Furthermore, estimating multilevel panel regression models, we investigate the sorting of highly innovative firms into dense urban and/or specialized regions by considering both observable and unobservable firm characteristics. The results indicate that spatial sorting is important. A large portion of the regional differences in firm innovation rates is due to firm characteristics. Estimates that ignore unobserved heterogeneity at the firm level still point to a positive and significant impact of localization economies on different types of innovation. However, once we include firm fixed effects and distinguish between manufacturing and services, only some weak indication for positive effects of localization on radical innovations of manufacturing firms remains. In addition, the probability to adopt an existing product by an manufacturing firm seems to be positively influenced by urbanization economies. For the service sector, in contrast, we find adverse effects of localization on different kinds of innovation and no important effect of urbanization.

Keywords

Agglomeration economies Spatial sorting Firm innovation Localization Urbanization 

JEL Classification

D22 O31 R12 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully thank the guest editors Lara Agostini, Barbara Bigliardi, Federico Caviggioli, and Francesco Galati, two anonymous referees, Johannes Bröcker, Timo Mitze as well as participants at the 3rd Geography of Innovation Conference, Toulouse 2016 and the 56th ERSA Congress, Vienna 2016 for their helpful remarks and suggestions which substantially improved the paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2019). Science and technology parks: A study of value creation for park tenants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1256–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcácer, J. (2006). Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science, 52(10), 1457–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, M., & Lööf, H. (2012). Small business innovation: Firm level evidence from Sweden. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 732–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9216-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, R., Quigley, J. M., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2005). Agglomeration and the spatial distribution of creativity. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, J. V. (2008). Networking off madison avenue. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(4), 1011–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00499.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–40.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739, Chap. 61). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 313–325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beaudry, C., & Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4), 325–342.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290020197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bellmann, L., Crimmann A., Evers, K., & Hujer, R. (2013) Regional determinants of establishments’ innovation activities: A multi-level approach. IZA discussion paper no. 7572. IZA - Institute of Labor EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben Abdesslem, A., & Chiappini, R. (2019). Cluster policy and firm performance: A case study of the French optic/photonic industry. Regional Studies, 53(5), 692–705.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1470324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berliant, M., Reed, R. R, I. I. I., & Wang, P. (2006). Knowledge exchange, matching, and agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(1), 69–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007a). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(17), 7301.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610172104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2007b). Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy, 36(1), 107–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 83(2), 181–199.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2007.tb00342.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47(4), 687–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00307-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buciuni, G., & Finotto, V. (2016). Innovation in global value chains: Co-location of production and development in italian low-tech industries. Regional Studies, 50(12), 2010–2023.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1115010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buenstorf, G., & Klepper, S. (2009). Heritage and agglomeration: The akron tyre cluster revisited. The Economic Journal, 119(537), 705–733.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02216.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carlino, G., & Kerr, W. R. (2015). Agglomeration and Innovation. In G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5, pp. 349–404, Chap. 6). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00006-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlino, G. A., Chatterjee, S., & Hunt, R. M. (2007). Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 389–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Combes, P. P., & Duranton, G. (2006). Labour pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Combes, P. P., & Gobillon, L. (2015). The empirics of agglomeration economies. In G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5, pp. 247–348, Chap. 5). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00005-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Beule, F., & Van Beveren, I. (2012). Does firm agglomeration drive product innovation and renewal? An application for Belgium. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(4), 457–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00715.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2063–2117, Chap. 48). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ebert, T., Brenner, T., & Brixy, U. (2018). New firm survival: The interdependence between regional externalities and innovativeness. Small Business Economics, 49, 21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0026-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellguth, P., Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2014). The IAB establishment panel: Methodological essentials and data quality. Journal for Labour Market Research, 47(1–2), 27–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0151-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldman, M. P. (1994a). The geography of innovation. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldman, M. P. (1994b). Knowledge complementarity and innovation. Small Business Economics, 6(5), 363–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feldman, M. P., & Kogler, D. F. (2010). Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 381–410, Chap. 8). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 395–418.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00361.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerlach, H., Rønde, T., & Stahl, K. (2009). Labor pooling in R&D intensive industries. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Helsley, R. W., & Strange, W. C. (2002). Innovation and input sharing. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Howell, A., He, C., Yang, R., & Fan, C. C. (2018). Agglomeration, (un)-related variety and new firm survival in China: Do local subsidies matter? Papers in Regional Science, 97(3), 485–500.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ivarsson, I., Alvstam, C., & Vahlne, J. E. (2017). Global technology development by colocating R&D and manufacturing: The case of swedish manufacturing MNEs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), 149–168.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  38. Ketokivi, M., & Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2009). Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: Postindustrial myth or economic reality? Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 35–54.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, S. (1989). Labor specialization and the extent of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 692–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kim, S. (1990). Labor heterogeneity, wage bargaining, and agglomeration economies. Journal of Urban Economics, 28(2), 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klepper S (2007) The geography of organizational knowledge. Mimeo: Carnegie Mellon University. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.362.1739
  42. Knoben, J. (2009). Localized inter-organizational linkages, agglomeration effects, and the innovative performance of firms. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 757–779.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0229-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kosfeld, R., & Werner, A. (2012). Deutsche Arbeitsmarktregionen—Neuabgrenzung nach den Kreisgebietsreformen 2007–2011. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 70, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 429–449.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a3457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mariani, M. (2002). Next to production or to technological clusters? The economics and management of R&D location. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(2), 131–152.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015702522373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  47. Mewes, L. (2019). Scaling of atypical knowledge combinations in american metropolitan areas from 1836 to 2010. In Economic geography (pp. 1–21).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1567261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moeller, K. (2018). Culturally clustered or in the cloud? How amenities drive firm location decision in Berlin. Journal of Regional Science, 58(4), 728–758.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Naz, A., Niebuhr, A., & Peters, J. C. (2015). What’s behind the disparities in firm innovation rates across regions? Evidence on composition and context effects. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 131–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0694-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niebuhr, A. (2017). Die Entwicklung regionaler Disparitäten in Deutschland - Persistente Unterschiede zwischen Ost- und Westdeutschland (engl. The development of regional disparities in Germany - persistant inequalities between East and West Germany). In H.H. Eberstein, H. Karl & G. Untiedt G (Eds.), Handbuch der regionalen Wirtschaftsförderung (Chap. A III, pp. 1–38). Schmidt.Google Scholar
  51. OECD (2005) Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation dataGoogle Scholar
  52. Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(1), 27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590303117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters, 5(4), 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pe’er, A., & Keil, T. (2013). Are all startups affected similarly by clusters? Agglomeration, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 354–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pe’er, A., Vertinsky, I., & Keil, T. (2016). Growth and survival: The moderating effects of local agglomeration and local market structure. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 541–564.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peters, B. (2009). Persistence of innovation: Stylised facts and panel data evidence. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2), 226–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Qian, H., & Haynes, K. E. (2014). Beyond innovation: The small business innovation research program as entrepreneurship policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(4), 524–543.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9323-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Renski, H. (2011). External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3), 473–502.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00325.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2008). The attenuation of human capital spillovers. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenthal, S. S., Strange, W. C., Henderson, J. V., & Thisse, J. F. (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2119–2171, Chap. 49). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  61. Sedgley, N., & Elmslie, B. (2004). The geographic concentration of knowledge: Scale, agglomeration, and congestion in innovation across U.S. states. International Regional Science Review, 27(2), 111–137.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017603262401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smit, M. J., Abreu, M. A., & Groot, H. L. (2013). Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 94(2), 249–272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, K. (2006). Measuring innovation. In D. C. Mowery & J. Fagerberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 148–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Srholec, M. (2010). A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1207–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sternberg, R., & Arndt, O. (2001). The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behavior of European firms? Economic Geography, 77(4), 364–382.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2001.tb00170.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The role of regional context on innovation persistency of firms. Papers in Regional Science, 97(4), 931–955.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. von Hippel, E. (2007) The sources of innovation. In: Das Summa Summarum des Management: Die 25 wichtigsten Werke für Strategie, Führung und Veränderung, Gabler, Wiesbaden (pp. 111–120).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IAB Nord, Regional Research Network of the Institute for Employment ResearchInstitute for Employment ResearchKielGermany
  2. 2.Empirical Labor Economics and Spatial Econometrics, Department of EconomicsChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu KielKielGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Rural StudiesJohann Heinrich von Thünen InstituteBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations