Advertisement

R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries

  • José Ernesto AmorósEmail author
  • Carlos Poblete
  • Vesna Mandakovic
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

In this article, we explore the effectiveness of government intervention, R&D, and pro-innovation mechanisms in the likelihood of being an innovative entrepreneur with high ambitions of growing, in the particular context of Latin America and the Caribbean. We use a longitudinal approach, with a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression procedure. The data comes mainly from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the Global Competitiveness Index. The sample covers 14 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean between 2006 and 2015. The results provide empirical insights about firm and individual characteristics that explain the likelihood of being an innovative and ambitious entrepreneur. We also find that effective and narrowed policies in addition to an innovation-driven environment, also increases innovative-ambitious entrepreneurs. The paper includes implications for policy makers that want to enhance local entrepreneurial framework conditions.

Keywords

Innovative ambitious entrepreneurship Technology transfer Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Latin America 

JEL Classification

L26 O32 O54 

Notes

References

  1. Acs, Z., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitive dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z., Astebro, T., Audretsch, D., & Robinson, D. T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: A call to arms. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 35–52.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.Google Scholar
  4. Amorós, J. E., Borraz, F., & Veiga, L. (2016a). Entrepreneurship and socioeconomic indicators in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 51(4), 186–201.Google Scholar
  5. Amorós, J. E., Ciravegna, L., Mandakovic, V., & Stenholm, P. (2017). Necessity or opportunity? The effects of state fragility and economic development on entrepreneurial efforts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717736857.Google Scholar
  6. Amorós, J. E., Etchebarne, M. S., Torres-Zapata, I., & Felzensztein, C. (2016b). International entrepreneurial firms in Chile: An exploratory profile. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2052–2060.Google Scholar
  7. Amorós, J. E., Fernández, C., & Tapia, J. (2012). Quantifying the relationship between entrepreneurship and competitiveness development stages in Latin America. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 249–270.Google Scholar
  8. Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016). Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 45–61.Google Scholar
  9. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D., & Caiazza, R. (2016). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1247–1259.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). Does entrepreneurship reduce unemployment? (No. 01-074/3). Tinbergen Institute discussion paper.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Carree, M. A., Van Stel, A. J., & Thurik, A. R. (2002). Impeded industrial restructuring: the growth penalty. Kyklos, 55(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy (No. 1204). Papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy.Google Scholar
  15. Autio, E. (2005). Creative tension: The significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s article ‘toward a theory of international new ventures’. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 9–19.Google Scholar
  16. Autio, E. (2007). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2007 global report on high-growth entrepreneurship. Babson Park: Babson College.Google Scholar
  17. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
  18. Autio, E., Pathak, S., & Wennberg, K. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362.Google Scholar
  19. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.Google Scholar
  20. Birch, D. (1987). The job generating process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bosma, N., Jones, K., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2009). GEM executive report 2008. Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, and Global Entrepreneurship Research Consortium.Google Scholar
  22. Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 747–767.Google Scholar
  23. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
  24. Bruton, G. D., Ketchen, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2013). Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 683–689.Google Scholar
  25. Capelleras, J. L., & Rabetino, R. (2008). Individual, organizational and environmental determinants of new firm employment growth: evidence from Latin America. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
  26. Carlsson, B. (1989). The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: an international study. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  27. Carree, M., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: an analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 271–290.Google Scholar
  28. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2005). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–471).Google Scholar
  29. Casson, M. (1995). Entrepreneurship and business culture; Studies in the economics of trust (Vol. 1). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Dau, L. A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 668–686.Google Scholar
  31. de Koning, A., & Snijders, J. (1992). Policy on small-and medium-sized enterprises in countries of the European Community. International Small Business Journal, 10(3), 25–39.Google Scholar
  32. De Soto, H. (1989). The other path (p. 17133). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  33. Dimov, D. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123–1153.Google Scholar
  34. Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship—Practice and principles. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  35. Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 564–580.Google Scholar
  36. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Golovko, E., & Valentini, G. (2011). Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 362–380.Google Scholar
  38. Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2005). Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some recent developments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(4), 441–459.Google Scholar
  39. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467–511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Kantis, H. (2005). The emergence of dynamic ventures in Latin America, Southern Europe and East Asia: An international comparison. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(1), 34–56.Google Scholar
  41. Kantis, H., Angelelli, P., & Moori-Koenig, V. (2004). Experience in Latin America and Worldwide. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank-Fundes International.Google Scholar
  42. Kantis, H., Federico, J., Angelelli, P., & Ibarra-García, S. (2016). Business performance in Young Latin American Firms. In I.-A. D. Bank, M. Grazzi, & C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), Firm innovation and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean: The engine of economic development (pp. 167–205). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.Google Scholar
  43. Kelley, D., Bosma, N. S., & Amorós, J. E. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2010 executive report. London: GERA.Google Scholar
  44. Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial geographies: Support networks in three high-technology industries. Economic Geography, 81(2), 201–228.Google Scholar
  45. Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.Google Scholar
  46. Klepper, S., & Simons, K. L. (2000). Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the US television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 997–1016.Google Scholar
  47. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Weaver, K. M. (2013). Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: The non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 273–291.Google Scholar
  48. Kwon, S. W., & Arenius, P. (2010). Nations of entrepreneurs: A social capital perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
  49. Landström, H., Åström, F., & Harirchi, G. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship studies: One or two fields of research? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 493–509.Google Scholar
  50. Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S., & Rigolini, J. (2014). Latin American entrepreneurs: Many firms but little innovation. World Bank Latin American and Caribbean studies. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved May 3, 2018 from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/800041468015024160/Latin-American-entrepreneurs-many-firms-but-little-innovation.
  51. Lehmann, E. E., & Seitz, N. (2017). Freedom and innovation: A country and state level analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1009–1029.Google Scholar
  52. Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177–194.Google Scholar
  53. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.Google Scholar
  54. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419.Google Scholar
  55. Leyden, D. P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 553–564.Google Scholar
  56. Loveman, G., & Sengenberger, W. (1991). The re-emergence of small-scale production: An international comparison. Small Business Economics, 3(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  57. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  58. Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2018). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2.Google Scholar
  59. Martínez-Fierro, S., Biedma-Ferrer, J. M., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship and strategies for economic development. Small Business Economics, 47(4), 835–851.Google Scholar
  60. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225.Google Scholar
  61. McMullen, J. S., & Dimov, D. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–1512.Google Scholar
  62. Messina, J., & Silva, J. (2017). Wage inequality in Latin America: understanding the past to prepare for the future (English). Latin American development forum series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  63. Minniti, M., Bygrave, W. D., & Autio, E. (2006). GEM global entrepreneurship monitor: 2005 executive report. London: London Bussiness School.Google Scholar
  64. Mrożewski, M., & Kratzer, J. (2017). Entrepreneurship and country-level innovation: Investigating the role of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1125–1142.Google Scholar
  65. OECD. (1996). SMEs: employment, innovation and growth: The washington workshop. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  66. Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2016). Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: Informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 506–529.Google Scholar
  67. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  68. Poblete, C. (2018). Growth expectations through innovative entrepreneurship: The role of subjective values and duration of entrepreneurial experience. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 191–213.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, M., Sachs, J., & McArthur, J. (2001). Executive summary: Competitiveness and stages of economic development. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2002, 16–25.Google Scholar
  70. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2006). Multilevel modelling of complex survey data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(4), 805–827.Google Scholar
  71. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.Google Scholar
  72. Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J. Drzeniek, Hanouz, M., Geiger, T., & Mia, I. (2010). The global competitiveness index 2010—2011: Looking beyond the global economic crisis. In K. Schwab (Ed.), The global competitiveness report 2010–2011 (pp. 3–55). Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  73. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  74. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.Google Scholar
  75. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  76. Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655.Google Scholar
  77. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.Google Scholar
  78. Stephan, U., Hart, M., and Drews, C.C. (2015a). Understanding motivations for entrepreneurship: a review of recent research evidence. Enterprise Research Centre and Aston Business School. Aston University, Birmingham. http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/25172/1/Understanding_motivations_for_entrepreneurship.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2017.
  79. Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2015b). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331.Google Scholar
  80. Storey, D. J. (1998). Six steps to heaven: Evaluating the impact of public policies to support small businesses in developed economies. Warwick Business School: Centre for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises.Google Scholar
  81. Storey, D. J. (2016). Understanding the small business sector (reedition). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Thai, M. T. T., & Turkina, E. (2014). Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 490–510.Google Scholar
  83. Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: An international study. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 703–716.Google Scholar
  84. Valdez, M. E., & Richardson, J. (2013). Institutional determinants of macro-level entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1149–1175.Google Scholar
  85. Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small business economics, 24(3), 311–321.Google Scholar
  86. Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture. In Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European-US comparison (pp. 11–81). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.Google Scholar
  88. Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  89. Winter, S. G. (2006). Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 125–141.Google Scholar
  90. World Economic Forum. (2015). In C. Schwab (Ed.), The global competitiveness report 2015. Geneva: WEF.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EGADE Business SchoolTecnológico de MonterreyMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Universidad del DesarrolloSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations