Advertisement

From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: the knowledge spillover construction circle

  • Rosa CaiazzaEmail author
  • Maksim Belitski
  • David B. Audretsch
Article

Abstract

The process that turns knowledge into innovation is highly ambiguous and complex. This study merges economic and management perspectives to extend the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship in explaining how the knowledge spillover construction circle works. At this aim it introduces the model of ‘latent and emergent entrepreneurship’ evidencing the strategic role of the entrepreneur in each step of the process that goes from the research of new knowledge to its commercialization.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Knowledge spillover Construction circle System of innovation 

JEL Classification:

M10 M15 

Notes

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(2), 336–367.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). Introduction: Entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies, 38(8), 871–877.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., & Varga, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 323–334.Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D. B., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The process of creative construction: Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3/4), 263–286.Google Scholar
  5. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. B. (2010). Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.Google Scholar
  6. Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 501–522.Google Scholar
  7. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.Google Scholar
  8. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Organization Science, 45, 905–917.Google Scholar
  9. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31, 776–793.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: The creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 819–836.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2018). National business regulations and city entrepreneurship in Europe: A multilevel nested analysis. In Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 1042258718774916.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., & Caiazza, R. (2016). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1247–1259.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1996). Creative destruction: Turbulence and economic growth in Germany. In Behavioral norms, technological progress, and economic dynamics, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254.Google Scholar
  16. Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany: Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of Context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
  19. Belitski, M., Chowdhury, F., & Desai, S. (2016). Taxes, corruption, and entry. Small Business Economics, 47, 201–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9724-y.Google Scholar
  20. Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2016). Creativity, entrepreneurship and economic development: City-level evidence on creativity spillover of entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1354–1376.Google Scholar
  21. Bhide, A. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 150–161.Google Scholar
  22. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
  23. Caiazza, R. (2014). Benchmarking of business incubators. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(6), 1062–1069.Google Scholar
  24. Caiazza, R. (2015). Explaining innovation in mature industries: Evidences from Italian SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 975–985.Google Scholar
  25. Caiazza, R. (2016a). A cross-national analysis of policies effecting innovation diffusion. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. Caiazza, R. (2016b). Internationalization of SMEs in high potential markets. Trends in Food Science & Technology. Google Scholar
  27. Caiazza, R. (2017). Innovation for sustainability: A conceptual framework. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
  28. Caiazza, R., Foss, N., & Volpe, T. (2016). What we do know and what we need to know about knowledge in the growth process. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 3(2), 191–203.Google Scholar
  29. Caiazza, R., Richardson, A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Knowledge effects on competitiveness: From firms to regional advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(6), 899–909.Google Scholar
  30. Caiazza, R., & Stanton, J. (2016). The effect of strategic partnership on innovation: An empirical analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 54, 208–212.Google Scholar
  31. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.Google Scholar
  32. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_12.Google Scholar
  33. Desai, S., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). A theory of destructive entrepreneurship. Jena Economic Research Paper 085. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1029648.
  34. Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3–4), 413–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2.Google Scholar
  35. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47, 117–132.Google Scholar
  36. Fritsch, M. (1997). New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics, 9(5), 437–448.Google Scholar
  37. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975.Google Scholar
  38. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  39. Gambardella, A., & Giarratana, S. (2010). Localized knowledge spillovers and skill-biased performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 323–339.Google Scholar
  40. George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Culture and its consequences for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 5–8.Google Scholar
  41. Gohmann, S. F. (2012). Institutions, latent entrepreneurship, and self-employment: An international comparison. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 295–321.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00406.x.Google Scholar
  42. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.Google Scholar
  43. Kirzner, I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. The Review of Austrian Economics, 11(1–2), 5–17.Google Scholar
  44. Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1–17.Google Scholar
  45. Liu, X., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Dai, O., & Lu, J. (2010). Human mobility and international knowledge spillovers: Evidence from high-tech small and medium enterprises in an emerging market. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 340–355.Google Scholar
  46. Markuerkiaga, L., Caiazza, R., Igartua, J. I., & Errasti, N. (2016). Factors fostering students’ spin-off firm formation: An empirical comparative study of universities from North and South Europe. Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 289–308.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Méon, P. G., & Sekkat, K. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122(1–2), 69–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3988-0.Google Scholar
  49. Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948.Google Scholar
  50. Oldroyd, J., Silvestri, L., & Gulati, R. (2010). A learning perspective on intraorganizational knowledge spill-ins. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 13.Google Scholar
  51. Parker, S. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Parker, S. (2010). A predator-prey model of knowlede spillovers and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.Google Scholar
  53. Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  54. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.Google Scholar
  55. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  57. Sobel, R. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.004.Google Scholar
  58. Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168.Google Scholar
  59. Stam, E. (2018). Measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems. In Entrepreneurial ecosystems, Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
  60. Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2003). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 175–201.Google Scholar
  61. Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.Google Scholar
  62. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, A. R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.Google Scholar
  63. Wennekers, A. R. M., Van Stel, A. J., Thurik, A. R., & Reynolds, P. D. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.Google Scholar
  64. Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parthenope University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Henley Business School, University of ReadingHenley-on-ThamesUK
  3. 3.School of Public and Environmental Affairs of Indiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations