Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 1993–2013 | Cite as

Academic entrepreneurship: exploring the effects of academic patenting activity on publication and collaboration among heterogeneous researchers in South Korea

  • Soo Jeung LeeEmail author
Article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of academic patenting activity on academic publication and on collaboration between researchers in academia and researchers in industry or public research institutes. The study focuses on the case of South Korea, where university research rapidly evolved along with economic development, and where university–industry linkages are strongly encouraged by government policies. The study collected data on 632 full-time faculty members in the natural sciences, bio sciences, and engineering sciences at 46 Korean universities from the National Research Foundation of Korea and other statistical data sources. The results show that academic patenting complements publishing up to a certain level of patenting activity, but then replaces publishing. Academic patenting also is shown to have positive effects on research collaboration with industry and statistically non-significant effects on research collaboration with researchers at public research institutes. This study expands the analysis on the effects of patents on research collaboration among heterogeneous researchers as well as publications in South Korea.

Keywords

University–industry linkage Patent Publication Research collaboration South Korea 

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angolo, C. A., & Costa, F. D. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education,57(2), 155–171.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science,48(1), 44–60.Google Scholar
  3. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2007). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,63(4), 599–623.Google Scholar
  4. Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy,37, 1837–1853.Google Scholar
  5. Berglar, P. (1970). Wilhelm von Humboldt. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  6. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review,5(2), 91–109.Google Scholar
  8. Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy,38, 281–292.Google Scholar
  9. Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2009). The unequal benefits of academic patenting for science and engineering research. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,56(1), 16–30.Google Scholar
  10. Choung, J. Y., & Hwang, H. R. (2013). The evolutionary patterns of knowledge production in Korea. Scientometrics,94(2), 629–650.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education systems: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, P. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science,48(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  13. Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy,40, 55–68.Google Scholar
  14. D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy,36, 1295–1313.Google Scholar
  15. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer,36, 316–339.Google Scholar
  16. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy,34(3), 349–367.Google Scholar
  17. Dornbusch, F., Schmoch, U., Schulze, N., & Bethke, N. (2013). Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach. Research Evaluation,22, 52–63.Google Scholar
  18. Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2010). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. In R. Viale & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The capitalization of knowledge (pp. 121–142). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva,21(2–3), 198–233.Google Scholar
  20. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy. A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  21. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy,29, 313–330.Google Scholar
  22. Fabrizio, K., & Di Minin, A. (2008). Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Research Policy,37, 914–931.Google Scholar
  23. Finardi, U. (2011). Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: The case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics,89(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  24. Gans, J. S., Murray, F. E., & Stern, S. (2017). Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge: Intellectual property and academic publication. Research Policy,46(4), 820–835.Google Scholar
  25. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy,35, 790–807.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Giunta, A., Pericoli, F. M., & Pierucci, E. (2016). University-Industry collaboration in the biopharmaceuticals: The Italian case. Journal of Technology Transfer,41, 818–840.Google Scholar
  28. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometrics analysis (5th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy,40, 1045–1057.Google Scholar
  30. Grimm, H. M., & Jaenicke, J. (2015). Testing the causal relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishing in Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer,40, 512–535.Google Scholar
  31. Guebeli, M. H., & Doloreux, D. (2005). An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Management,8(3), 269–282.Google Scholar
  32. Hackett, E. (2005). Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science,35(5), 787–826.Google Scholar
  33. Han, S. H., & Kwon, K. (2009). The relationship between institutional characteristics, funding, structure, and knowledge-transfer performance of Korean universities engaged in science and engineering. Korean Public Administration Review,43(3), 307–325. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  34. Heinze, T., & Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Across institutional boundaries? Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience. Research Policy,37(5), 888–899.Google Scholar
  35. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education,49, 155–176.Google Scholar
  36. Ho, M. H., Liu, J. S., & Kuan, M. C. (2016). Torn between academic publications and university-industry collaboration. Research Evaluation,25(2), 151–160.Google Scholar
  37. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,26(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  38. Kerr, C. (1995). The uses of the university. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kim, H. C., & Lee, S. D. (2007). A study on relationships between performance of university-industry cooperation and competency factors of university. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society,10(4), 629–653. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  40. Kim, K., Seo, J., & Han, S. (2000). A study on the governmental programs for promoting cooperative R&D: status and future direction. Seoul: Sceience & Technology Policy Institute. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  41. Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2013). The white paper on intellectual property 2013. Seoul: Korean Intellectual Property Office. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  42. Leavis, F. R. (1943). Education and the university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, S. J. (2015). Growth behavior of research collaboration with heterogeneous colleagues and research commercial activities in Korean academics. In W. K. Cummings & U. Teichler (Eds.), The relevance of academic work in comparative perspective (pp. 121–138). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, L. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the Amercian Society for Information Science and Technology,60(4), 778–788.Google Scholar
  45. Merton, K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy,27, 835–851.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea. (2012). Survey on university-industry cooperation. Daejeon: National Research Foundation of Korea. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2012). Leaders in industry-university cooperation (LINC). Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  49. Ministry of Science and KISTEP. (1989–2012). Survey of research and development in Korea. Seoul: Ministry of Science and KISTEP. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  50. Ministry of Science and Technology. (2008). 40 years of science and technology. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  51. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research Policy,30, 99–119.Google Scholar
  52. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,63, 648–687.Google Scholar
  53. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and science. Research Policy,26, 317–330.Google Scholar
  54. Nelson, A. (2012). Putting university research in context: Assessing alternative measures of production and diffusion at Stanford. Research Policy,41, 678–691.Google Scholar
  55. Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (Eds.). (2004). The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality and the risks of the market. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Office, Korean Intellectual Property. (2010). The patent trend in Korea 2010. Seoul: Korean Intellectual Property Office. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  57. Oh, Y. J. (2009). The professors’ activities in University Industry linkages and their performances in Korea: With respect to National Innovation System. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Seoul national University. (in Korean)Google Scholar
  58. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: Faculty decision and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer,26, 99–114.Google Scholar
  59. Park, K., Han, D., & Kwon, K. (2008). A study on the effect of academics’ patenting activities on their research activities: In case of Korea. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society,11(4), 510–531. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  60. Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., & Tartari, V. (2015). Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation,24, 380–391.Google Scholar
  61. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy,42, 423–442.Google Scholar
  62. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy,30, 509–532.Google Scholar
  63. Shin, J. C. (2009a). Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project. Higher Education,58(5), 669–688.Google Scholar
  64. Shin, J. C. (2009b). Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: A performance-based approach. Higher Education,57, 247–266.Google Scholar
  65. Shin, J. C., & Harman, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: Global and Asian-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review,10, 1–13.Google Scholar
  66. Shin, J. C., & Lee, S. J. (2015). Evolution of research universities as a national research system in Korea: Accomplishments and challenges. Higher Education,70(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
  67. Shin, J. C., Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2013). Research collaboration across higher education systems: Maturity of higher education systems, language use, and regional differences. Studies in Higher Education,38(3), 425–440.Google Scholar
  68. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  70. So, B., & Yang, D. (2009). An empirical study on the relationship between intellectual property management activities and technology transfer performance of the university. Korea Journal of Business Administration,22(2), 889–912. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  71. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2004). Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. Contemporary Economic Policy,22, 162–178.Google Scholar
  72. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy,35, 1569–1585.Google Scholar
  73. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2012). Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public–private collaboration. Research Evaluation,23, 204–215.Google Scholar
  74. Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2010). The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China’s nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics,4, 338–350.Google Scholar
  75. Wong, P., & Singh, A. (2013). Do co-publications with industry lead to higher levels of university technology commercialization activity? Scientometrics,97, 245–265.Google Scholar
  76. Yun, K. S., Kim, S. K., Lee, S. H., & Hwang, T. H. (2007). Comparative analysis on patent management practice in Korean and USA academics. Seoul: Korea Institute of Intellectual Property. (in Korean).Google Scholar
  77. Zhang, G. J., Feng, Y. Q., Yu, G., Liu, L. N., & Hao, Y. Q. Q. (2017). Analyzing the time delay between scientific research and technology patents based on the citation distribution model. Scientometrics,111(3), 1287–1306.Google Scholar
  78. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science,48(1), 138–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationSejong UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations