Stimulating academic patenting in a university ecosystem: an agent-based simulation approach
- 275 Downloads
Technology transfer to society is—in addition to research and teaching—widely acknowledged as a third mission of modern universities. Academic entrepreneurship and academic patenting are two closely related means to do so and, more often than not, patenting activity and entrepreneurship are part of a linear sequence in the commercialization process. This paper is mainly concerned with the first step. To further academic patenting, university administrations have installed or expanded existing technology transfer offices (TTOs) as active stakeholders in the university ecosystem. These offices must find the right measures (e.g., monetary or non-monetary incentives or providing information at internal events) and offer them to the right group of scientists (e.g., departments) at the right point in time. This is challenging because scientists’ decision whether to publish or patent depends on several factors, including individual preferences, perceived normative social pressure from peers, level of information received through word-of-mouth communication or informational events, and previous first-hand experience. An agent-based simulation approach may serve as a decision aid for this purpose. Such an approach models stakeholders as ‘agents’ who interact with each other, and through these interactions, the system’s behavior evolves and can be observed. In this paper, we introduce an agent-based simulation for evaluating measures that can be employed by a TTO in order to stimulate academic patenting and, subsequently, the foundation of spin-off companies relying on such patents. The applicability of the approach is illustrated through an example.
KeywordsUniversity ecosystem Technology transfer TTO measures Decision aid Complex social system Agent-based simulation
JEL ClassificationC53 I23 O31 O34
We thank Francesco Lissoni and Michele Pezzoni for applying their name-matching algorithms to our professors’ list as well as Lars Lüpke for retrieving the professors’ names from the websites of (some) Austrian universities.
- AUTM. (2017). FY2015: U.S. licensing activity survey. http://www.autm.net/fy2015-survey. Accessed 13 June 2017.
- Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar
- Backs, S. (2012). The role and impact of technology transfer offices on academic patenting: Theory and practice in selected Austrian universities. Working Paper, Chair of Innovation and Technology Management, Bielefeld University. (German).Google Scholar
- Borshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: Reasons, techniques, tools. In 22nd International conference of the system dynamics society. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Del Barrio-Castro, T., & García-Quevedo, J. (2009). The determinants of university patenting: Do incentives matter? Working Paper, Barcelona Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
- Farre-Mensa, J., Hegde, D., & Ljungqvist, A. (2016). Do patents facilitate entrepreneurs’ access to venture capital? Working Paper, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Franzoni, C., & Lissoni, F. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship, patents, and spin-offs: Critical issues and lessons for Europe. Working Paper No. 180, CESPRI at Bocconi University.Google Scholar
- Frey, B., & Neckermann, S. (2008). Academics appreciate awards: A new aspect of incentives in research. CESIfo Working Paper Series No. 2531, CESIfo, Munich.Google Scholar
- Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35(10), 1599–1615.Google Scholar
- Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (1991). Simulation modeling and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Murray, F. (2006). The OncoMouse that roared: Resistance & accommodation to patenting in academic science. Working Paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Stummer, C., Günther, M., & Backs, S. (2013). A survey on academic patents at Austrian universities: Methodology and initial results. Working Paper, Chair of Innovation and Technology Management, Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
- Valdivia, W. D. (2013). University start-ups: Critical for improving technology transfer. Research Paper, Center for Technology Innovation, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Wadsack-Köchl and Kasparovsky. (2016). Higher education in Austria. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy.Google Scholar