The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda
- 102 Downloads
Over the past decades, public policy has promoted the establishment of science parks to support the development and growth of technology-based firms and, as such, spur economic prosperity. However, despite the worldwide proliferation of science parks and scholarly interest, their contribution is yet to be fully understood. This paper presents the current state of knowledge on science park contribution using the Input–Mediator–Outcome framework and is based upon an analysis of 175 journal articles published between 1988 and 2018. Furthermore, the paper uncovers critical methodological and theoretical deficiencies in the literature, and identifies promising avenues for future research, which will provide important insights to both academics and practitioners.
KeywordsScience parks Contribution Literature review Technology transfer
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from The National Bank of Belgium and The Special Research Fund of Ghent University.
- Albahari, A. (2015). Science and technology parks: Does one size fit all? In J. T. Miao, P. Benneworth, & N. A. Phelps (Eds.), Making 21st century knowledge complexes: technopoles of the world revisited (pp. 191–207). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Annerstedt, J. (2006). Science parks and high-tech clustering. In P. Bianchi (Ed.), International handbook on industrial policy (pp. 279–296). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Anttiroiko, A. V. (2004). Global competition of high-tech centres. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(3–6), 289–323.Google Scholar
- Battelle Technology Partnership Practice. (2018). Driving regional innovation and growth: The 2012 survey of North American University Research Parks. Columbus, OH. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://aurp.memberclicks.net/assets/documents/aurp_batelllestudy2012-final.pdf.
- Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Brockhaus, R. H., & Horwitz, P. S. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In N. Krueger (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: Critical perspectives on business and management (2nd ed., pp. 260–283). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
- Flynn, D. M. (1993). Sponsorship and the survival of new organizations. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
- Foray, D. (2018). Smart specialisation strategies and industrial modernisation in European regions—Theory and practice. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(6), 1505–1520.Google Scholar
- Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
- Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2018). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IASP. (2017). IASP in a few words. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://www.iasp.ws/About-us/IASP-in-a-few-words.
- Jimenez-Moreno, J. J., Martínez-Cañas, R., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2013). The role of science and technology parks in the generation of firm level social capital through university-firm relations: An empirical study in Spain. In J. J. M. Ferreira, M. Raposo, R. Rutten, & A. Varga (Eds.), Cooperation, clusters, and knowledge transfer: Universities and firms towards regional competitiveness (pp. 19–34). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinsella, N. S. (2001). Against intellectual property. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 15(2), 1–54.Google Scholar
- Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2018). Geographic proximity and science parks. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCoach, D. B. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling. In R. Hancock & R. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 123–140). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Monck, C. S., Porter, R. B., Quintas, P., & Storey, D. J. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, J. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Rowe, D. (2014). Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks—An advice and guidance report on good practice. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy.Google Scholar
- Stephan, U., Hart, M., & Drews, C. C. (2015). Understanding motivations for entrepreneurship: A review of recent research evidence. Report, Birmingham: Enterprise Research Centre.Google Scholar
- UKSPA. (2017). About UKSPA. Retrieved October 4, 2017 from http://www.ukspa.org.uk/our-association/about-us.
- Westhead, P., & Storey, D. J. (1994). An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom. Richmond: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2004). The case study anthology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar