Seed accelerators and the speed of new venture creation

  • John Stayton
  • Vincent Mangematin


Technology startups need to launch, simultaneously and quickly, innovative products (or services) and organizations, but some are able to launch more quickly than others. This paper explores how some ventures start up very quickly, and the mechanisms by which accelerator programs assist nascent technology ventures to minimize startup time. Through four in-depth case studies of clean technology ventures that started up quickly, two with and two without the aid of accelerators, the rapid launch of startups is explored and accelerator mechanisms are clarified: survival (starting up quickly is a matter of survival), resource network (starting up quickly requires leveraging pre-existing networks) and catching up (accelerators fill gaps to allow inexperienced entrepreneurs to start up quickly). The three mechanisms speed up the launch process and organize scarcity management to motivate the top management team. The paper proposes to extend the minimum viable product concept to the minimum viable start-up as a consequence of acceleration. These three mechanisms for speeding up innovative venture launch are tied to increasing entrepreneurial orientation in the startup technology firm. The practical perspective assists managers of accelerator programs (university-based, economic development, non-profit or for-profit) to design and implement programs that will more effectively fill gaps to help ventures to start up more quickly.


Accelerators Seed accelerators Startup accelerators Technology commercialization Clean technology Business incubators New venture creation 

JEL Classification

M130 O310 O320 


  1. Allen, D. N., & McCluskey, R. (1990). Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 61–77.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294. Scholar
  3. Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28. Scholar
  4. Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 65–72.Google Scholar
  6. Bliemel, M. J., & Flores, R. G. (2015). Defining and differentiating accelerators: Insights from the Australian context. In Academy of management (pp. 1–34). Vancouver, BC.
  7. Bliemel, M. J., Flores, R. G., de Klerk, S., Miles, M. P. P., Costa, B., & Monteiro, P. (2016). The role and performance of accelerators in the Australian startup ecosystem. Department of Industry, Innovation & Science (Made Public 25 May, 2016).Google Scholar
  8. Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Edelman, L. F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 547–566. Scholar
  9. Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11(6), 461–466. Scholar
  10. Chen, J., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2005). The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: The moderating effects of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(2), 199–212. Scholar
  11. Clausen, T., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation, 32(9–10), 560–567. Scholar
  12. Cohen, S. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3/4), 19–25. Scholar
  13. Cohen, S., & Hochberg, Y. (2014). Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon, Available at SSRN 2418000 1–16. Retrieved from
  14. De Clercq, D., Fried, V. H., Lehtonen, O., & Sapienza, H. J. (2006). An entrepreneur’s guide to the venture capital galaxy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dempwolf, C., Auer, J., & D’Ippolito, M. (2014). Innovation accelerators: Defining characteristics among startup assistance organizations. Sba.Gov. Retrieved from
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989a). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989b). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110. Scholar
  20. Graham, P. (2012). How Y combinator started. Retrieved from
  21. Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22. Scholar
  23. Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C. B., & Cohen, S. L. (2014). Do accelerators accelerate? A study of venture accelerators as a path to success. In Academy of management proceedings (p. 12955). Academy of Management.
  25. Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C., & Cohen, S. (2016). Do accelerators accelerate? The role of indirect learning in new venture development.
  26. Harrison, R. T., Mason, C. M., & Girling, P. (2004). Financial bootstrapping and venture development in the software industry. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(4), 307–333. Retrieved from
  27. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187. Scholar
  28. Hochberg, Y. V. (2016). Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffman, D. L., & Radojevich-Kelley, N. (2012). Analysis of accelerator companies: An exploratory case study of their programs, processes, and early results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54–70.Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661. Scholar
  31. Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1996). Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1143–1191.Google Scholar
  32. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. Scholar
  33. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451. Scholar
  34. Malek, K., Maine, E., & McCarthy, I. P. (2014). A typology of clean technology commercialization accelerators. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 32, 26–39. Scholar
  35. Mechanism. (n.d.). Retrieved November 7, 2016, from
  36. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. Scholar
  37. Page, W., & Garbuio, M. (2016). Corporate accelerators: A new approach to building entrepreneurial communities. In SMS special conference (pp. 1–2).Google Scholar
  38. Patton, D., Warren, L., & Bream, D. (2009). Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 621–636. Scholar
  39. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50–51(October), 13–24. Scholar
  40. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. Scholar
  41. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  42. Schein, E. H. (1989). The role of the founder in the creation of organizational culture. Readings in Managerial Psychology. Scholar
  43. Scherer, F. M. (2015). First mover advantages and optimal patent protection. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 559–580. Scholar
  44. Schoonhoven, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Lyman, K. (1990). Speeding products to market : Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shah, S. K., & Pahnke, E. C. (2014). Parting the ivory curtain: Understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 780–792. Scholar
  46. Smith, S. W., & Hannigan, T. J. (2015). Swinging for the Fences: How do top accelerators impact the trajectories of new ventures? In DRUID15. Rome.Google Scholar
  47. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111. Scholar
  48. Stayton, J., & Mangematin, V. (2016). Startup time, innovation and organizational emergence: A study of USA-based international technology ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship. Scholar
  49. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. Scholar
  50. Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567. Scholar
  51. Wong, A., Bhatia, M., & Freeman, Z. (2009). Angel finance: The other venture capital. Strategic Change, 230, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsSonoma State UniversityRohnert ParkUSA
  2. 2.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations