The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 795–813 | Cite as

The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance

Article

Abstract

We ask whether academic employees with non-academic work experience differ from their colleagues with respect to interaction with external stakeholders and research performance. We use a science and technical human capital perspective and address the question through an analysis of 4400 survey responses from academic employees in Norwegian universities and colleges. Non-academic work experience is common in all academic fields; it characterises more than half of the tenured academic staff members in Norway. Our analysis indicates that, in general, external interaction is positively influenced by non-academic work experience, in line with prior research. Contrary to expectations, we find few signs of a trade-off or a “punishment” effect of non-academic work experience on scientific productivity. Non-academic work experience is neither significantly related to publication productivity nor share of publications in highly ranked journals, but there are important differences based on the type of previous work experience.

Keywords

Academic engagement Non-academic work experience Scientific and technical human capital Academic entrepreneurship University–industry relations 

JEL Classification

I23 O32 L23 M54 

References

  1. Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analyzing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29, 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative approach to R&D evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(8), 716–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. D. (2009). Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis—Definitions, differences, and choices. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  7. Cañibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: The state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation, 18(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
  8. Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1084–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Este, P., & Fontana, R. (2007). What drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? A study on collaborative research partnerships in the UK. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez-Zubieta, A., Geuna, A., & Lawson, C. (2015). What do we know of the mobility of research scientists and of its impact on scientific production. LEI & BRICK working paper series 08/2015.Google Scholar
  13. Geuna, A., Kataishi, R., Toselli, M., Guzmán, E., Lawson, C., Fernandez-Zubieta, A., & Barros, B. (2015). SiSOB data extraction and codification: A tool to analyze scientific careers. Research Policy, 44(9), 1645–1658. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Gulbrandsen, M., Mowery, D., & Feldman, M. (2011). Heterogeneity and university–industry relations: Introduction to the special section. Research Policy, 40, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. K. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. -A. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen, T. M. (2011). The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence. Research Policy, 40(1), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centres: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lubango, L. M., & Pouris, A. (2007). Industry work experience and inventive capacity of South African academic researchers. Technovation, 27, 788–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Olmos-Peñuela, J., Benneworth, P. & Castro-Martínez, E. (2015). What stimulates researchers to make their research usable? Towards an ‘openness’ approach. Minerva, 53(4), 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39, 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant. Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  28. Van Rijnsoever, F. J., Hessels, L. K., & Vandeberg, R. L. J. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37, 1255–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and CultureUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations