The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 430–450 | Cite as

What drives ICT clustering in European cities?

  • Maksim Belitski
  • Sameeksha DesaiEmail author


ICT clusters have attracted much attention because of their rapid growth and their value for other economic activities. Using a nested multi-level model, we examine how conditions at the country level and at the city level affect ICT clustering activity in 227 cities across 22 European countries. We test for the influence of three country regulations (starting a business, registering property, enforcing contracts) and two city conditions (proximity to university, network density) on ICT clustering. We consider heterogeneity within the sector and study two types of ICT activities: ICT product firms and ICT content firms. Our results indicate that country conditions and city conditions each have idiosyncratic implications for ICT clustering, and further, that these can vary by activities in ICT products or ICT content manufacturing.


ICT Clustering Europe Policy Multi-level Urban 

JEL Classification

R110 R120 L00 



We thank Zoltan Acs, David Audretsch and participants of the 2013 Transatlantic Policy Consortium.


  1. Acs, Z., & Armington, C. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies, 38(8), 911–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show? Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996). RandD spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 157–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besag, J., York, J., & Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhat, C. R. (2000). A multi-level cross-classified model for discrete response variables. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34(7), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bilbao-Osorio, B., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brenner, T. (2001). Simulating the evolution of localised industrial clusters-an identification of the basic mechanisms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(3), 4.Google Scholar
  18. Brenner, T. (2004). Local industrial clusters: Existence, emergence and evolution. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brenner, T., & Mühlig, A. (2013). Factors and mechanisms causing the emergence of local industrial clusters: A summary of 159 cases. Regional Studies, 47(4), 480–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., & Saxenian, A. (2001). Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’outcomes: Cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 835–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Breznitz, D. (2007). Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry. Research Policy, 36(9), 1465–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 3, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cappelli, R., Czarnitzki, D., & Kraft, K. (2014). Sources of spillovers for imitation and innovation. Research Policy, 43, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chavis, L., Klapper, L., & Love, I. (2011). The impact of the business environment on young firm financing. World Bank Economic Review, 25, 486–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Todtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  26. Desai, S., Acs, Z. J., & Weitzel, U. (2013). A model of destructive entrepreneurship insight for conflict and postconflict recovery. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(1), 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Druilhe, C., & Garnsey, E. (2000). Emergence and growth of high-tech activity in Cambridge and Grenoble. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 564–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. European Commission, (2011). Business Dynamics: Start-ups, Business Transfers and Bankruptcy: The economic impact of legal and administrative procedures for licensing, business transfers and bankruptcy on entrepreneurship in Europe. Accessed June 21, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. (2012). ICT Technologies Work Programme 2013., date last accessed 21 June 2013. Accessed 15 July 2014.
  32. Eurostat. (2012). City statistics urban audit. Accessed 7 April 2013.
  33. Eurostat. (2015). What is a city?—Spatial units. Accessed 7 March 2015.
  34. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gilbert, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1982). Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–526.Google Scholar
  37. Glaeser, E., Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2010). Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoang, H. A., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734–758.Google Scholar
  40. Holmen, M., & McKelvey, M. (2005). Systematic evolutionary studies of regional restructuration it and biotech case-studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(3), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iammarino, S., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (2015). ICT production and labour productivity in the Italian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(2), 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Innovation Observatory. (2013). Selling ICT products and services to business: Better market segmentation report. Accessed 21 June 2013.
  43. Jorgenson, D., Stiroh, K., Gordon, R., & Sichel, D. (2000). Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 125–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Massachusetts: MIT press.Google Scholar
  46. Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Langford, I. H., Leyland, A. H., Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1999). Multilevel modelling of the geographical distributions of diseases. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 48(2), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. LEAD. (2014). E-leadership skills for competitiveness and innovation. European Commission, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry. Accessed 15 July 2014.
  50. Leitao, J., Baptista, R. (2008). Inward FDI and ICT: Are they a joint technological driver of entrepreneurship? In engineering management conference. IEMC Europe 2008 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  51. Leitao, J., & Baptista, R. (2011). Inward FDI and ICT: Are they a joint technological driver of entrepreneurship? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 10(3), 268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manolova, T., Eunni, R., & Gyoshev, B. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 203–218.Google Scholar
  53. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mullan, E. (2011). What is digital content? EContent magazine. Accessed 7 March 2015.
  55. Mundlak, Y. (1988). Endogenous technology and the measurement of productivity (pp. 316–331). Washington, D.C: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  56. Phan, P., & Foo, M. (2004). Technological entrepreneurship in emerging regions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.Google Scholar
  59. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2001). Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence. Papers in Regional Sciences, 80(3), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Saxenian, A. (1999). Silicon Valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  65. Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Siegel, D. (Ed.). (2006). Technological entrepreneurship. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  67. Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sobel, R. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Szerb, L., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Ortega-Argiles, R., Komlosi, E. et. al. (2013). REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index—Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy. REGIO DG 02-Communication.Google Scholar
  73. The State of European Cities Report. (2007). Accessed 7 March 2015.
  74. Thurik, R., Carree, M., van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van der Linde, C. (2003). The demography of clusters—Findings from the cluster meta-study. In J. Bröcker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 130–149). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Villasenor, J. (2013). Six ‘Megatrends’ that will shape the future of digital media. Forbes magazine. Accessed 7 March 2015.
  77. Vu, K. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2013). Learning activities, exploration, and the performance of strategic initiatives. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206313506463.
  79. Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Woolley, J. L. (2014). The creation and configuration of infrastructure for entrepreneurship in emerging domains of activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 721–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woolley, J. L., & Rottner, R. M. (2008). Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 791–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. World Bank. (2012). Doing business report. Accessed 19 March 2013.
  83. Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ziedonis, R. H. (2004). Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6), 804–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations