Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 836–858 | Cite as

The impact of participation in European joint research projects on knowledge creation and economic growth

  • Daniela Di Cagno
  • Andrea Fabrizi
  • Valentina MelicianiEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of participation in European scientific networks on the stock of knowledge and on economic growth. We use scientific links in FP programmes to weight foreign R&D in order to construct two different measures of foreign R&D spillovers and we assess their impact on the production of knowledge (patents) and on economic growth in a panel of countries participating in FP over the period 1994–2005. We find that participation in EU funded projects is an important channel of knowledge transfer. However, while for countries with high levels of R&D expenditure R&D spillovers contribute to the generation of new knowledge, for low R&D spenders knowledge spillovers facilitate technological imitation and catching up.

Keywords

R&D collaboration EU Framework Programmes Knowledge spillovers Patents Economic growth 

JEL Classification

O33 O47 L14 C2 

References

  1. Abdelmoula, M., & Legros, D. (2009). Interregional R&D spillovers. In Europe. Région et Développement, 30, 101–117.Google Scholar
  2. Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano, M. & Bo, H. (2001). Panel data models: Some recent developments, Chapter 53. In J. J. Heckman & E. E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 5, pp. 3229–3296). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold, E., Clark, J., & Muscio, A. (2005). What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance. Science and Public Policy, 32(5), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2006). Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 860–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2007). Governance structures in R&D network: An analysis in the European context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Autant-Bernard, C., Mairesse, J., & Massard, N. (2007). Spatial Knowledge Diffusion Through Collaborative Networks. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banchoff, T. (2002). Institutions, inertia and European research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benfratello, L., & Sembenelli, A. (2002). Research joint ventures and firm level performance. Research Policy, 31, 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blomström, M., & Sjöholm, F. (1999). Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? European Economic Review, 43, 915–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blundell, R. W., & Bond, S. R. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Windmeijer, F. (2002). Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2007). The international dynamics of R&D and innovation in the long run and in the short run. Economic Journal, 11(518), 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Branstetter, L. G. (2001). Are knowledge-spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconomic evidence from the US and Japan. Journal of International Economics, 53, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 439–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caloghirou, Y., Vonortas, N. S., & Ioannides, S. (Eds.). (2006). Knowledge flows in European industry. London and New York: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Caloghirou, Y., Vonortas, N. S., & Tsakanikas, A. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of European Framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). Spillovers and R&D Cooperation: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92, 1169–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cincera, M., & Van Pottelsberghe de la potterie, B. (2001). International R&D spillovers: A survey. Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, 169(1), 3–32.Google Scholar
  24. Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39, 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. (1997). North-South R&D Spillovers. Economic Journal, 107, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Commission of the European Communities. (1994–2005). Annual report on research and technological development activities of the European union.Google Scholar
  28. Commission of the European Communities. (2005). RTD info, n. 46.Google Scholar
  29. D’Este, P., Guy F., & Iammarino, M. (2012). Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs010.
  30. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geuna, A. (1998). Determinants of university participation in EU funded R&D cooperative projects. Research Policy, 26, 677–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patents statistics as economics indicators: A survey. Journal of Economics Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
  34. Griliches, Z. (1992). The search for R&D Spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagerdoon, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hagerdoon, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Inter-firm R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, B. H., Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. A. (1986). Patents and R& D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27(2), 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, B.H., Mairesse J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D, United Nations University ONU-MERIT Working Paper Series, 006.Google Scholar
  39. Hayashi, T. (2003). Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes. Research Policy, 32, 1421–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoeckman, J., Scherngell, T., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. (2013). Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(1), 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1–2), 105–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keller, W. (1998). Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. European Economic Review, 42, 1469–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller, W. (2002a). Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review, 92, 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keller, W. (2002b). Trade and the transmission of technology. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33, 1201–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luukkonen, T. (2002). Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU framework programme. Research Policy, 31(3), 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macdissi, C., & Negassi, S. (2002). International R&D spillovers: An empirical study. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 11(2), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maggioni, M. A., Novelli, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maggioni, M.A., Novelli, M., & Uberti, T.E. (2011). Treating patents as relational data. Industry and Innovation, pp.39–67.Google Scholar
  53. Maggioni, M. A., & Uberti, T. E. (2011). Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 45, 1031–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Medda, G., Piga, C., & Siegel, D. (2006). Assessing the returns to collaborative research: Firm-level evidence from Italy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meliciani, V. (2000). The relationship between R&D, investment and patents: A panel data analysis. Applied Economics, 32(11), 1429–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis, Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.Google Scholar
  58. Paier, M., & Scherngell, T. (2011). Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Park, W. G. (1995). International R & D spillovers and the OECD Economic Growth. Economic Inquiry, 33, 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peri, G. (2004). Knowledge flows and productivity. Rivista di Politica Economica, III–IV, 21–59.Google Scholar
  61. Roediger-Schluga, T., & Barber, M. J. (2006). The structure of R&D collaboration networks in the European framework programmes, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, 36.Google Scholar
  62. Roediger-Schluga, T., & Dachs, B. (2006). Does technology affect network structure?. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series: A quantitative analysis of collaborative research projects in two specific EU programmes. 41.Google Scholar
  63. Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Terleckyj, N. E. (1980). What do R&D numbers tell us about technological change. American Economic Review, 70(2), 55–61.Google Scholar
  65. van Pottelsberghe, B., & Lichtenberg, F. (2001). Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verspagen, B. (1997). Estimating international technology spillovers using technology flow matrices. Review of World Economics, 133(2), 226–248.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Di Cagno
    • 1
  • Andrea Fabrizi
    • 2
  • Valentina Meliciani
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.University LUISS Guido Carli of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Ministry of Economic DevelopmentRomeItaly
  3. 3.University of TeramoTeramoItaly

Personalised recommendations