Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art
- First Online:
- 5.5k Downloads
There is abundant evidence that research collaboration has become the norm in every field of scientific and technical research. We provide a critical overview of the literature on research collaboration, focusing particularly on individual-level collaborations among university researchers, but we also give attention to university researchers’ collaborations with researchers in other sectors, including industry. We consider collaborations aimed chiefly at expanding the base of knowledge (knowledge-focused collaborations) as well as ones focused on production of economic value and wealth (property-focused collaborations), the latter including most academic entrepreneurship research collaborations. To help organize our review we develop a framework for analysis, one that considers attributes of collaborators, collaborative process and organization characteristics as the affect collaboration choices and outcomes. In addition, we develop and use a “Propositional Table for Research Collaboration Literature,” presented as an “Appendix” to this study. We conclude with some suggestions for possible improvement in research on collaboration including: (1) more attention to multiple levels of analysis and the interactions among them; (2) more careful measurement of impacts as opposed to outputs; (3) more studies on ‘malpractice’ in collaboration, including exploitation; (4) increased attention to collaborators’ motives and the social psychology of collaborative teams.
KeywordsResearch collaboration Knowledge transfer Technology transfer Research productivity Academic entrepreneurship Contributorship Research effectiveness
JEL ClassificationO31 O32 O38 L23 M38
- Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information with the R&D organization. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Aschoff, B., & Grimpe, C. (2011). Localized norms and academics’ industry involvement: The moderating role of age on professional imprinting. Unpublished paper downloaded February 3, 2012 from http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/veranstaltungen/innovationpatenting2011/papers/Grimpe.pdf.
- Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (in press). Academic faculty working in university research centers: Neither capitalism’s slaves nor teaching fugitives. The Journal of Higher Education. Google Scholar
- Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., Slade, C. P., & Gaughan, M. (2012). The “dark side” of academic research collaborations: Case studies in exploitation, bullying and unethical behavior. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) October 17–20, 2012, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make additionality in the public support of RD in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4–5), 587–600.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M. B., Tarnow, E., & De Young, B. R. (2004). Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survey-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. Medscape General Medicine, 63(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Crow, M. M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R&D laboratories in the US national innovation system. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Feller, I., & Roessner, D. (1995). What does industry expect from university partnerships? Congress wants to see bottom-line results from industry/government programs, but that’s not what the participating companies are seeking. Issues in Science and Technology, 12(1), 80–84.Google Scholar
- Goel, R. K., & Grimpe, C. (2011) Active versus passive academic networking: Evidence from micro-level data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9236-5.
- Johnson, J., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Perspective: Adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students’ careers in academic medicine and the scientific pipeline. Academic Medicine, 87(11), 1488–1495.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, industrial & corporate change. Research Policy, 16(4), 641–655.Google Scholar
- Matt, M., Robin, S., & Wolff, S. (2011). The influence of public programs on inter-firm R&D collaboration strategies: Project-level evidence from EU FP5 and FP6. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–32. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9232-9.
- Merton, R. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74(2), 379–422.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Engineering. (2003). The impact of academic research on industrial performance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Academic Labor, 51, 9–38.Google Scholar
- Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Shrum, W., Genuth, J., & Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.Google Scholar