National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation
- 1.1k Downloads
While there has been much emphasis over the last decade on the science of nanotechnology and on the implications and risks of potential applications, it is now timely to increase attention to the emerging dynamics of nanotechnology commercialization. This paper examines, from a global perspective, where and how corporations are entering into nanotechnology innovation. The paper tests the proposition that a significant shift has occurred in recent years in the orientation of corporate nanotechnology activities—from research discovery to patented applications. It also examines the extent to which the character and structure of corporate nanotechnology activity by country initially reflects national innovation system characteristics and prior public research funding inputs in the stage when discovery is most emphasized. The results indicate that national innovation systems characteristics are significant factors in the commercialization shift of nanotechnology and highlight the importance of innovation system policy factors. We also observe the influence of cross-border international invention linkages, suggesting that national innovation policies also need to be open and international in orientation.
KeywordsNanotechnology National innovation systems Corporate research Commercialization
JEL classificationO3 O5
This research received support from the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (National Science Foundation Award 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Transatlantic Workshop on Nanotechnology Innovation and Policy, March 24–26, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia.
- Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
- Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London, Washington: Pinter Publisher.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Ribas, A. (2009). Firms’ global patent strategies in an emerging technology. IEEE Xplore, October 2009. Google Scholar
- Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
- Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
- Glanzel, W., Meyer, M., Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., Schlemmer, B., et al. (2003). Nano-technology, analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavor. Leuven, Belgium: Report of Steunpunt O&O Statistieken.Google Scholar
- Laredo, P. (2008). Positioning the work done on nano s&t associated to prime. Manchester, UK: Paper presented at the Nanotechnology Science Mapping and Innovation Trajectories. September 9.Google Scholar
- Lundvall, B. Á. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publ.Google Scholar
- Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York, NY: Lux Research.Google Scholar
- Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation. In J. Fabergerg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 380–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mowery, D. (2010). Nanotechnology and the U.S. National innovation system: Continuity and change. Paper presented at the Transatlantic Workshop on Nanotechnology Innovation and Policy, Atlanta, Georgia USA, March 24–26.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- PEN (2009a). Consumer products inventory, project on emerging nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed 28 August 2009.
- PEN. (2009b). Nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1, 000 mark. Release no. 64–09. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
- Rennie, M. (1993). Global competitiveness: Born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45–52.Google Scholar
- Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Subramanian, V., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Shapira, P. (2009). Is there a shift to “active nanostructures? Journal of Nanoparticle Research (in press). Available Online First, August 2009.Google Scholar
- Tang, L., Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). China. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2010). Gross domestic expenditures on R&D (GERD). http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=1781. Accessed 10 April 2010.
- Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2009). Partnering with universities: A good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? Small Business Economics (Online First).Google Scholar
- World Bank (2010). Country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups#High_income. Accessed 10 April 2010.
- Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2007). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 123–130.Google Scholar