The generation and exploitation of technological change: market value and total factor productivity
- 322 Downloads
In this paper we articulate and test the hypothesis that TFP is a reliable and relevant measure of firm’s innovation capabilities, and, as such, accounts for Tobin’s q indicator. With this aim, we investigate empirically the relationship between firm level total factor productivity and the Tobin’s q. Measuring Tobin’s q allows inferring the actual value of knowledge capital from stock market valuation. We use a panel of companies listed on UK and the main continental Europe financial markets (Germany, France and Italy) for the period 1995–2005. Our results confirm that TFP is a reliable indicator of firm’s innovative capabilities. When we control for firm’s R&D investments and intangible assets, the effects of TFP on market value remain highly significant. This suggests that TFP is a broader measure of innovation capability than R&D is. The validation of the Tobin’s q and TFP relationship has important implications concerning firm’s technological innovation measurement.
KeywordsTobin’s q Innovation Total factor productivity Knowledge capital
JEL ClassificationO3 O33
The authors wish to thank Bronwyn Hall, Raffaele Paci and Fabiano Schivardi for useful suggestions. Preliminary versions have been presented at CRENoS-DECA seminar series, University of Cagliari, and the AFSE 2009 tematic meeting, Sophia Antipolis. We are grateful for the useful comments of many participants. The financial support of the Collegio Carlo Alberto and the Dipartimento di Economia dell’università di Torino is acknowledged. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 216813.
- Balasubramanyan, L., & Mohan, S. (2009). How well is productivity being priced? Journal of Economics and Finance. doi: 10.1007/s12197-009-9083-5.
- Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2006). Innovation and market value: A quantile regression analysis. Economics Bulletin, 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 78, 419–423.Google Scholar
- Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Daniel Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In C. Corrado, J. Haltwinger, & D. Sichel (Eds.), Measuring capital in the new economy, studies in income and wealth (Vol. 65, pp. 11–41). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Daniel Sichel, D. (2006). Intangible capital and economic growth. NBER working paper no. 11948. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Dwyer, D. W. (2001). Plant-level productivity and the market value of a firm. Working paper no. 01-03, Center for Economic Studies, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z., & Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H. (1990). The manufacturing sector masterfile: 1959–1987. NBER working paper no. 3366, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H. (1993). The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980s. American Economic Review, 83, 259–264.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Returns to R&D and productivity. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosemberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2). North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, E. (1965). Rates of return from industrial research and development. American Economic Review, 55, 310–322.Google Scholar
- Megna, P., & Klock, M. (1993). The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Review, 83, 265–269.Google Scholar
- Van Ark, B. (1995). Sectoral growth accounting and structural change in Post-War Europe. In B. Van Ark & N. F. R. Crafts (Eds.), Quantitative aspects of Post-War European economic growth (pp. 84–164). Cambridge: CEPR/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar