The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 353–382 | Cite as

The generation and exploitation of technological change: market value and total factor productivity

Article

Abstract

In this paper we articulate and test the hypothesis that TFP is a reliable and relevant measure of firm’s innovation capabilities, and, as such, accounts for Tobin’s q indicator. With this aim, we investigate empirically the relationship between firm level total factor productivity and the Tobin’s q. Measuring Tobin’s q allows inferring the actual value of knowledge capital from stock market valuation. We use a panel of companies listed on UK and the main continental Europe financial markets (Germany, France and Italy) for the period 1995–2005. Our results confirm that TFP is a reliable indicator of firm’s innovative capabilities. When we control for firm’s R&D investments and intangible assets, the effects of TFP on market value remain highly significant. This suggests that TFP is a broader measure of innovation capability than R&D is. The validation of the Tobin’s q and TFP relationship has important implications concerning firm’s technological innovation measurement.

Keywords

Tobin’s q Innovation Total factor productivity Knowledge capital 

JEL Classification

O3 O33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Bronwyn Hall, Raffaele Paci and Fabiano Schivardi for useful suggestions. Preliminary versions have been presented at CRENoS-DECA seminar series, University of Cagliari, and the AFSE 2009 tematic meeting, Sophia Antipolis. We are grateful for the useful comments of many participants. The financial support of the Collegio Carlo Alberto and the Dipartimento di Economia dell’università di Torino is acknowledged. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 216813.

References

  1. Antonelli, C., & Quatraro, F. (2010). The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity. Empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(4), 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonelli, C., & Teubal, M. (2008). Knowledge intensive property rights and the evolution of venture capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balasubramanyan, L., & Mohan, S. (2009). How well is productivity being priced? Journal of Economics and Finance. doi:10.1007/s12197-009-9083-5.
  4. Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37, 932–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch, C. (2005). R&D investment and internal finance: The cash flow effect. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloch, C. (2008). The market valuation of knowledge assets. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blundell, R., Bond, S., Devereux, M., & Schiantarelli, F. (1992). Investment and Tobin’s Q. Journal of Econometrics, 51, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassia, L., Colombelli, A., & Paleari, S. (2009). Firms’ growth: Does the innovation system matter? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cefis, E., & Ciccarelli, M. (2005). Profit differentials and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2006). Innovation and market value: A quantile regression analysis. Economics Bulletin, 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
  12. Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 78, 419–423.Google Scholar
  13. Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Daniel Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In C. Corrado, J. Haltwinger, & D. Sichel (Eds.), Measuring capital in the new economy, studies in income and wealth (Vol. 65, pp. 11–41). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Daniel Sichel, D. (2006). Intangible capital and economic growth. NBER working paper no. 11948. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  15. Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and US economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research and development, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 115–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dwyer, D. W. (2001). Plant-level productivity and the market value of a firm. Working paper no. 01-03, Center for Economic Studies, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D and patents. Economics Letters, 7, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Griliches, Z., & Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, B. H. (1990). The manufacturing sector masterfile: 19591987. NBER working paper no. 3366, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, B. H. (1993). The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980s. American Economic Review, 83, 259–264.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (2006). Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Returns to R&D and productivity. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosemberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2). North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, B. H., & Oriani, R. (2006). Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 24, 971–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, H., Lim, H., & Park, Y. (2009). How should firms carry out technological diversification to improve their performance? An analysis of patenting of Korean firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(8), 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magri, S. (2009). The financing of small innovative firms: The Italian case. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18, 24–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mansfield, E. (1965). Rates of return from industrial research and development. American Economic Review, 55, 310–322.Google Scholar
  31. March, J. C. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizing learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Megna, P., & Klock, M. (1993). The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Review, 83, 265–269.Google Scholar
  33. Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shane, H., & Klock, M. (1997). The relation between patent citations and Tobin’s Q in the semiconductor industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 9, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tobin, J. (1978). Monetary policies and the economy: The transmission mechanism. Southern Economic Journal, 37, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Toivanen, O., Stoneman, P., & Bosworth, D. (2002). Innovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989–1995. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citation and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Ark, B. (1995). Sectoral growth accounting and structural change in Post-War Europe. In B. Van Ark & N. F. R. Crafts (Eds.), Quantitative aspects of Post-War European economic growth (pp. 84–164). Cambridge: CEPR/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.CRENoSUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly
  3. 3.BRICK (Bureau of Research in Innovation Complexity and Knowledge)Collegio Carlo AlbertoMoncalieri, TorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations