Ready to leave the ivory tower?: Academic scientists’ appeal to work in the private sector
- 552 Downloads
This study investigates the factors that shape the attitudes of scientists toward starting their own business or working in a private sector firm. The analysis is based on data collected from scientists working in the German Max Planck Society, a research institution devoted to basic science. We find that the scientists’ attractiveness of working in a private sector firm or of starting their own business differ considerably according to their academic discipline and the self-reported commercial potential of their research. The ability to take risks, prior work experience in private firms, and personal experience in cooperating with industry lead to a positive attitude towards switching to private sector employment or entrepreneurship. Strong willingness to freely distribute research findings is related to a low appeal of private sector work.
KeywordsKnowledge transfer Science Entrepreneurship Innovation Commercialization
JEL ClassificationO31 O33 L26 L32
- Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. B. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501–522.Google Scholar
- Azoulay, P., Ding, W. W., & Stuart, T. (2006). The impact of academic patenting on (public) research output. NBER Working Paper #11917.Google Scholar
- Charles, D., & Conway, C. (2001). Higher education–business interaction survey: A report to the UK HE funding bodies and the Office of Science and Technology. Newcastle: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
- Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. Noll (Ed.), Challenges to the research university (pp. 171–198). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schrupp, J., & Wagner, G.G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. DIW Discussion Paper 511, available at http://220.127.116.11/documents/publikationen/73/43553/dp511.pdf. Accessed October, 15th, 2009.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Gittelman, M. (1999). Knowledge as property: Innovation in biotechnology in the United States and in France. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, IM: L1–L6.Google Scholar
- Herrera, L., Muñoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2010). Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm’s innovation process. Journal of Business Research, 63(5), 510–518.Google Scholar
- Link, A. N., & Ruhm, C. J. (2010). Public knowledge, private knowledge: The intellectual capital of entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Martinelli, D. (2001). Labour market entry and mobility of young French PhDs. In: Innovative people—Mobility of skilled personnel in national innovation systems. OECD Proceedings, 2001, 159–173.Google Scholar
- Max Planck Society (2009). Max Plank Society: Annual Report 2008, available at http://www.mpg.de/pdf/jahresbericht2008/jahresbericht2008.pdf, Accessed February, 9th, 2009.
- Noll, R. (1998). Challenges to research universities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- OECD (2002). International mobility of the highly skilled. OECD Report, Paris, available at: http://pesona.mmu.edu.my/~chtan/Seminar/9202011E.pdf?bcsi_scan_2A2102422E3B7B6B=0&bcsi_scan_filename=9202011E.pdf, Accessed August, 15th, 2009.
- Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280.Google Scholar
- Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe: Results from graduates surveys from twelve countries. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship—University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Toole, A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2007). Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 716–738.Google Scholar
- Wagner, G. G., Frick, J., & Schrupp, J. (2007). German Socio.Economic Panel. http://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/56579/personen_en_2007.pdf. Accessed October, 28th, 2009.
- Wright, M., Clarysee, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham, UK.l: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.Google Scholar