The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration
This study analyses international research collaboration for eight science-based technologies in the Netherlands for the period 1988–2004. It is found that the share of international research collaborations in research collaboration is high, but not rising during the period investigated. This result suggests that the process of internationalization has reached an end. It is also found that collaboration between academic and non-academic organizations is less likely to take place at the international level than collaboration between academic organizations. This suggests that collaborating within national research systems helps academia, firms and governmental organizations to overcome differences in norms, values and incentives. Nonetheless, international collaboration between academic and non-academic organizations is also frequently occurring. Some consider these collaborations as undesirable, insofar academic research funded domestically is ‘leaking’ to foreign firms in such research collaborations. Such unwanted knowledge spillovers has lead some to plea for a ‘technology-nationalism’ in science policy instead of a ‘techno-globalization’. An analysis of the ‘balance of trade’ in international collaborations between Dutch academia and foreign firms and between Dutch firms and foreign academia shows that fears for unwanted knowledge spillovers are unfounded.
KeywordsResearch collaboration Internationalization University–industry collaboration
JEL ClassificationsO32 O38
The author gratefully acknowledges comments on earlier versions of this paper from Koen Frenken, Jarno Hoekman, Frank van Oort, Otto Raspe and two anonymous referees.
- Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2003). Mobility and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited. CESPRI Working Paper 142, Bocconi University Milan.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, J. (1995). The globalisation of technology: What remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 155–174.Google Scholar
- Edler, J. (Forthcoming). Creative internationalization: Widening the perspectives on analysis and policy regarding international R&D activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, in press.Google Scholar
- Frenken, K., Hoekman, J., & van Oort, F. (2007). Towards a European research area. Rotterdam/The Hague: NAi Publishers/RPB, www.rpb.nl.
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Levy, R., Roux, P., & Wolff, S. (forthcoming). An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European university. Journal of Technology Transfer, in press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Ostry, S., & Nelson, R. (1995). Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: Conflict and cooperation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Wagner, C., Brahmakalum, I., Jackson, B., Yoda, T., & Wong, A. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics – A modern approach (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
- Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2004). Internationalization in science in the prism of bibliometric indicators. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar