Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 367–395 | Cite as

Commercializing biomedical science in a rapidly changing “triple-helix” nexus: The experience of the National University of Singapore

  • Poh-Kam Wong
Article

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, the Singapore government had embarked on a significant push to develop the city-state into a major life-science R&D and industrial cluster in Asia. Although a major focus of this new thrust involves attracting leading life science companies overseas to establish operations in Singapore and developing new public life science research institutions to attract overseas life science research talents (Finegold, Wong, and Cheah (2004)), the local universities are expected to play an important role as well. In particular, the National University of Singapore (NUS), the leading university in Singapore, has also started to pursue major strategic change to become more “entrepreneurial”, and identified life science as a major focus for technology commercialization as well. Adapting the “Triple-Helix” framework of Etzkowitz, Webster, Gebhardt, & Terra (2000), this paper examines the significant changes in the university-government-industry “Triple-Helix” nexus for life science in Singapore, and their consequent impact on life science commercialization at NUS. Implications for universities in other late-comer countries seeking to catch up in the global biotech race are discussed.

Keywords

University technology commercialization Innovation policy Life science Singapore 

JEL Classifications

O31 O32 O53 

References

  1. Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR). (various years). National Survey of R&D in Singapore. Singapore: A*STAR.Google Scholar
  2. A*STAR (2005). “Singapore’s Biomedical Sciences Industry Recorded Exceptional 33% Growth in Manufacturing Output For 2004”, http://www.a-star.edu.sg/astar/biomed/action/pressrelease_details.do?id = 0fb4e42369Mm.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, K., Wong, P.K. (2003). Technology spin-offs from Pacific Rim Universities: Entrepreneurial context and economic impact, paper presented at the 23rd Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, June 3–5, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Bioprocessing Technology Institute website, http://www.bti.a-star.edu.sg/
  5. Bioinformatics Institute website, http://www.bii.a-star.edu.sg/
  6. Casper, S. (2003). Commercializing science in Europe: The Cambridge biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 11, 825–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, A. L. (2001). Maintaining S’pore’s lead in stem-cell race. The Straits Times, Sept 5.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, P. (2003). The evolution of biotechnology in three continents: Schumpeterian or Penrosian? European Planning Studies, 11, 757–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke, P. (2004). The accelerating evolution of biotechnology clusters. European Planning Studies, 12, 915–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EDB (various years) Report on the census of industrial production. Singapore: EDB.Google Scholar
  11. EDB (various years) Report on the census of manufacturing activities. Singapore: EDB.Google Scholar
  12. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldman, M. P., & d Francis, J. L. (2003). Fortune Favors the Prepared Region: The case of entrepreneurship and the capitol region biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies 11, 765–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finegold, D., Wong, P. K., & Cheah, T. C. (2004). Adapting a foreign direct investment strategy to the knowledge economy: The case of Singapore’s emerging biotechnology cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(7), 921–941.Google Scholar
  15. Genome Institute of Singapore website, http://www.gis.a-star.edu.sg/
  16. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology website, http://www.ibn.a-star.edu.sg/
  17. Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology website, http://www.imcb.a-star.edu.sg/
  18. Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. (2004). Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan. Research Policy, 33, 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Science & Technology Board. (various years). National Survey of R&D in Singapore. Singapore: NSTB.Google Scholar
  20. National University of Singapore (NUS). (2004). NUS Annual Research Report 2003–2004. Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  21. NUS. (various issues). Knowledge Enterprise Online, downloaded from http://www.newshub.nus.edu.sg/
  22. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell W. W. (2005). A comparison of US and European University-industry Relations in the Life Sciences. Management Science, 48, 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prevezer, M. (2001). Ingredients in the early development of the U.S. biotechnology industry. Small Business Economics, 17, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Traufetter, G. (2005). Biotech in Singapore: A treasure island for Elite researchers. Spiegel Online http://www.service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,349122,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsui-Auch, L. S. (2004). Bureaucratic rationality and nodal agency in a developmental state: The case of state-led biotechnology development in Singapore. International Sociology, 19(4), 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United States Patent and Trademark Office website: http://www.uspto.gov/patft/index.html
  27. Wong, P.K. (2005). From technology adopter to innovator: The dynamics of change in the National System of Innovation in Singapore. In: C. Edquist, & L. Hommen (Eds.), Small economy innovation systems: Comparing globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe, Elgar (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Wong, P. K. (2002). Globalization of American, European and Japanese Production Networks and The Growth of Singapore’s Electronics Industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(7/8), 843–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wong, P.K. (2001). Leveraging Multinational Corporations, Fostering Technopreneurship: The Changing Role of S&T Policy in Singapore, International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5/6), 539–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zucker L., & Darby M. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 12709–12716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NUS Entrepreneurship CentreNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations