The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 291–300

Public–Private Partnerships in International Agricultural Research: An Analysis of Constraints

Article

Abstract

Public–private partnerships are a potentially important means of conducting pro-poor agricultural research in many developing countries. Yet within the international agricultural research sector, there are few examples of successful collaboration that have contributed to food security, poverty reduction or agricultural development. This study hypothesizes that partnerships between public research agencies and private, multinational firms are constrained by fundamentally different incentive structures; prohibitive costs, both direct and indirect; mutually negative perceptions between the sectors; and high levels of competition and risk associated with valuable assets and resources. Based on a survey of key stakeholders and a review of the literature, findings suggest that the primary impediments to partnership are perceptions, competition and risk, while issues of costs and conflicting incentives are secondary. These findings suggest that investment in innovative organizational mechanisms and supportive public policies could facilitate more, and more successful, public–private partnerships in pro-poor agricultural research.

Keywords

agricultural development research and development public-private partnership 

JEL Classification

L33 O3 Q16 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AVAC (AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition), 2003, ‘Legislation: Incentives proposed in the US Congress for AIDS vaccine research and delivery,’ accessed at URL: http://www.avac.org/actionLeg.htm, December 15, 2003.
  2. Barry, G., Horsch, R. 2000

    ‘Evolving Role of the Public and Private Sector in Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries’

    Persley, G.J.Lantin, M.M. eds. Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor. Proceedings of an International Conference, Washington, D.C., 21–22 Oct. 1999CGIARWashington, D.C.183185
    Google Scholar
  3. Binenbaum, E., Pardey, P.G., Wright, B.D. 2001‘Public–Private Research Relationships: The Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research’American Journal of Agricultural Economics83748753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buse, K., Walt, G. 2000a‘Global Public–Private Partnerships: Part I – A New Development in Health?’Bulletin of the World Health Organization78549561Google Scholar
  5. Buse, K., Walt, G. 2000b‘Global Public–Private Partnerships: Part II – What are the Health Issues for Global Governance?’Bulletin of the World Health Organization78699709Google Scholar
  6. Buse, K., Waxman, A. 2001‘Public–Private Health Partnerships: A Strategy for WHO’Bulletin of the World Health Organization79748754Google Scholar
  7. Buurma, J.S., Boselie, D.M. 2000‘Stakeholder Perception Analysis for Agri-Supply Chain Development’Acta Horticulturae536625633Google Scholar
  8. Byerlee, D. and K. Fischer, 2001, ‘Accessing Modern Science: Policy and Institutional Options in Developing Countries,’ IP Strategy Today 1.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J.I., Falconi, C., Komen, J. 2000

    ‘Perspectives from International Agricultural Research Centers ISNAR’

    Lele, U.Lesser, W.Horstkotte-Wesseler, G. eds. Intellectual Property Rights in AgricultureWorld BankWashington, DC2228Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Series Rural Development 2
    Google Scholar
  10. CGIAR (Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)1998The International Research Partnership for Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture: Third System Review of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural ResearchCGIAR SecretariatWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Correa, C. 2000Integrating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing CountriesThe South CenterGeneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. De Bruijn, J.A. and H.G. van der Voort, 2002, Public–Private Partnership in Scientific Research: A Framework for Evaluation, study commissioned by the Consultative Committee of Sector Councils for Research and Development, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Driscoll, J., Cowger, G.L., Egan, R.J. 1979‘SMR Forum: Private Managers and Public Myths – Public Managers and Private Myths’Sloan Management Review215357Google Scholar
  14. Ekboir, J., Parellada, G. 2002

    ‘Public–Private Interactions and Technology Policy in Innovation Processes for Zero Tillage in Argentina’

    Byerlee, D.Echeverria, R. eds. Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of PrivatizationCABIOxon, UK137154
    Google Scholar
  15. Fredland, R.A. 2000‘Technology Transfer to the Public Sector in Developing States: Three Phases’Journal of Technology Transfer25265275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guilloux, A., Moon, S. 2001Hidden Price Tags: Disease-Specific Drug Donations: Costs and AlternativesMédecins Sans Frontières/Drugs for Neglected Diseases Working Group PaperGeneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, A., Sulaiman, R., Clark, N., Sivamohan, M.V.K., Yoganand, B. 2002

    ‘Public–Private Sector Interaction in the Indian Agricultural Research System: An Innovation Systems Perspective on Institutional Reform’

    Byerlee, D.Echeverria, R. eds. Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of PrivatizationCABIOxon, UK155176
    Google Scholar
  18. Hazell, P.B.R., Haddad, L.J. 2001Agricultural Research and Poverty ReductionInternational Food Policy Research InstituteWashington, DC2020 Vision Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., Wang, Q. 2002‘Plant Biotechnology in China’Science295674677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPPPH (Initiative on Public–Private Partnerships for Health), 2003, accessed at URL: http://www.ippph.org/index.cfm, December 5, 2003.
  21. James, C.J., 1996, ‘Agricultural Research and Development: The Need for Public–Private Sector Partnerships,’ Issues in Agriculture 9., Washington, DC: CGIAR.Google Scholar
  22. Leisinger, K.M., 1995, Sociopolitical Effects of New Biotechnologies in Developing Countries, Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper No. 2, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J. 2000

    ‘Leveraging Partnerships Between the Public and the Private Sector: Experience of USAID’s Agricultural Biotechnology Programs’

    Persley, G.J.Lantin, M.M. eds. Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor.CGIARWashington, D.C.196199Proceedings of an International Conference, Washington, D.C., 21–22 Oct. 1999
    Google Scholar
  24. Meinzen-Dick, R.S., A. Adato, L. Haddad, and P. Hazell, 2003, Impacts of Agricultural Research on Poverty: Findings of an Integrated Economic and Social Analysis, Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 111/Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 164, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Pardey, P.G., Beintema, N.M. 2001Slow Magic: Agricultural R&D a Century After MendelAgricultural Science and Technology Indicators/International Food Policy Research InstituteWashington, D.CTechnical Report 36Google Scholar
  26. PSC (Private Sector Committee of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research), 1999, Report of the Tenth Meeting of the CGIAR Private Sector Committee, Hattersheim, Germany, March 11–12, 1999, meeting report, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Pray, C.E. 2001‘Public–Private Sector Linkages in Research and Development: Biotechnology and the Seed Industry in Brazil, China and India’American Journal of Agricultural Economics83742747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pray, C.E., Huang, J., Hu, R., Rozelle, S. 2002‘Five Years of Bt cotton in China – The Benefits Continue’Plant Journal31423430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rangan, S., R. Samii, and L.N. Wassenhove, 2003, ‘Constructive Partnerships: When Alliances between Private Firms and Public Actors Can Enable Creative Strategies,’ Insead manuscript. Accessed at URL, http://62.50.65.8/index.cfm?page=/ippph/publications&thechoice=retrieve&docno=61, December 15, 2003.
  30. Sandman, P.M., Miller, P.M., Johnson, B.B., Weinstein, N.D. 1993‘Agency Communication Community Outrage and Perception of Risk: Three Simulation Experiments’Risk Analysis13585598Google Scholar
  31. Sandman, P.M., Weinstein, N.D., Hallman, W.K. 1998‘Communications to Reduce Risk Underestimation and Overestimation’Risk Decision and Policy393108Google Scholar
  32. Shear, R.H., 2000, ‘Perspectives from Industry: Monsanto,’ in U. Lele, W. Lesser, and G. Horstkotte-Wesseler (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in Agriculture, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Series, Rural Development 3, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, M., Cayford, J. 2003American Patent Policy, Biotechnology, and African Agriculture: The Case for Policy ChangeResources for the FutureWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Meer, K. 2002

    ‘Public–Private Cooperation in Agricultural Research: Examples from the Netherlands’

    Byerlee, D.Echeverria, R. eds. Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of PrivatizationCABIOxon, UK123136
    Google Scholar
  35. Walt, G., Lush, L. 2001Getting Drugs to Where They are Needed: Global Public Private Partnerships for Neglected DiseasesBiotechnology and Development Monitor46912Google Scholar
  36. Webber, D., Kremer, M. 2001Perspectives on Stimulating Industrial Research and Development for Neglected Infectious DiseasesBulletin of the World Health Organization79735741Google Scholar
  37. World Bank2003The CGIAR at 31: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural ResearchOperations Evaluation Department, World BankWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  38. World Bank2002The World Bank’s Approach to Global Programs: An Independent Evaluation, Phase I ReportOperations Evaluation Department, World BankWashington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  39. WEF (World Economic Forum), 2003, African Food Security: A Role for Public Private Partnership, from the World Economic Forum Africa Economic Summit 2003, June 12, 2003, accessed at URL: http:/www.weforum.org, September 29, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Food Policy Research InstituteAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.International Food Policy Research InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations