The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 30, Issue 1–2, pp 17–33 | Cite as

Technology and Technology Transfer: Mansfieldian Inspirations and Subsequent Developments

  • David J. Teece
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the foundational work and ideas of Edwin Mansfield to the economics of technological change and innovation, and introduces some of the recent work in the field. I argue that much of the recent work on patenting, technology strategy and the economics of knowledge has roots to the early Mansfield contributions, and that he should be recognized as a pioneer for these recent developments.

economics of innovation knowledge intangible assets knowledge R&D managements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armour, H. and D. Teece, 1978, 'Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis,' The Bell Journal of Economics 9 (2), 106–122.Google Scholar
  2. Brynjolfsson, E. and S. Yang, 1999, 'The Intangible Costs and Benefits of Computer Investments: Evidence From Financial Markets,' Working Paper, Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, P. and M. Casson, 1976, The Future of the Multina-tional Enterprise, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  4. Coase, R.H., 1988,'The Nature of the Firm: Origin, Mean-ing, Influence,' Journal of Law, Economics, and Organiza-tion 4 (1), 3–47.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, S., J. Kesinger, and J. Martin, 1992, 'The Market Rewards Promising R&D,' Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 5, 59–62.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A., 1968, Strategy and Structure, Cambridge: Har-vard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, A.H., 1968, 'The Entrepreneur, Introductory Remarks,' American Economic Review 58 (2), 60–63.Google Scholar
  8. Dosi, G., 1982, 'Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determi-nants and Directions of technical Change,' Research Policy 11, 147–162.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, D., 2003, 'The Antitrust Economics of Multi Sided Platform Markets,' Yale Journal of Regulation (forthcom-ing).Google Scholar
  10. Grandstrand, O., 1994, 'Economics of Technology: An Intro-duction and Overview,' in Idem (ed.), Economics of Technology, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Grandstrand, O., 2004, Economics, Law, and Intellectual Prop-erty, Boson: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, R.M., 1996, 'Prospering in Dynamically Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration,' Organization Science 7 (4), 375–387.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, B., A. Jaffee, and M. Trajtenberg, 2000, Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look, Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  14. Hand, J. and B. Lev, 2003, Intangible Asset Values, Measures, Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F.A., 1945, 'Economics and Knowledge,' in F.A. Hayek, (ed. ), Individualism and Economic Order, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hymer, S., 1976, International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, J.Y. and E. Mansfield, 1996, 'Intellectual Property Pro-tection and US Direct Investment,' Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2), 181–186.Google Scholar
  18. Kreps, D., 2004, 'Beliefs and Tastes: Confessions of an Econo-mist,' in Augier and March (2004), Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert Simon, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levin, R., C. Klevorick, R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter, 1987, 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783–820.Google Scholar
  20. Lippman, S. and R. Rumelt, 1982, 'Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency Under Com-petition,' Bell Journal of Economics 13, 418–438.Google Scholar
  21. Machlup, F., 1967, 'Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behav-ioral, Managerial,' American Economic Review 57, 1–33.Google Scholar
  22. Mansfield, E., 1961, 'Technical Change and the Rate of Imita-tion,' Econometrica 29 (40), 714–766.Google Scholar
  23. Mansfield, E., 1968, The Economics of Technological Change, New York: W. W. Norton &Company Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Mansfield, E., 1975, 'International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirements, and Policies,' American Economic Review 65 (2), 372–376.Google Scholar
  25. Mansfield, E., 1986, 'Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study,' Management Science 32, 173–181.Google Scholar
  26. Mansfield, E., 1991, 'Social Returns from R&D: Findings, Methods and Limitations,' AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 24, 24–27.Google Scholar
  27. Mansfield, E., 1993, 'Unauthorized use of Intellectual Prop-erty: Effects on Investment, Technology Transfer, and Innovation,' in M.B. Wallerstein et al. (eds.), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mansfield, E., 1994, Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer, IFC discus-sion papers, No. 19, Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  29. Mansfield, E., 1995, 'Introduction,' in Idem (ed. ), Innovation, Technology and the Economy: The Selected Essays of Edwin Mansfield, Vol. 1, Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Mansfield, E., A. Romeo, M. Schwartz, D. Teece, S. Wagner, and P. Brach, 1982, Technology Transfer, Productivity, And Economic Policy, New York: W. W. Norton &Company.Google Scholar
  31. Mansfield E., D. Teece and A. Romeo, 1979, 'Overseas Research and Development by U. S.-Based Firms,' Eco-nomica 46 (May), 187–196.Google Scholar
  32. Mansfield E., M. Schwartz and S. Wagner, 1981, 'Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study,' The Economic Journal 91, 907–918.Google Scholar
  33. Mansfield, E., R. John, R. Anthony, W. Samuel, and B. George, 1977, 'Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,' Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 221–240.Google Scholar
  34. Medoff, M., 1996, 'A Citation-Based Analysis of Economists and Economics Programs,' The American Economist 40 (1), 46–49.Google Scholar
  35. Morck, R. and B. Yeung, 2003, Why Firms Diversify: Inter-nalization v. Agency Behavior.Google Scholar
  36. Nelson, R. and S. Winter, 1977, 'In Search of a Useful The-ory of Innovation,' Research Policy 6, 36–76.Google Scholar
  37. Piekarz, R., 1983, 'R&D and Productivity Growth: Policy Studies and Issues,' American Economic Review 73, 210–214.Google Scholar
  38. Polyani, M., 1966, The Tacit Dimension, New York: Double-day.Google Scholar
  39. Scherer, F., 1983, 'R&D and Declining Productivity Growth,' American Economics Review 73, 215–218.Google Scholar
  40. Schankerman, M., 1998, 'How Valuable Is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field', Rand Journal of Econom-ics 29 (1), 77–107.Google Scholar
  41. Shannon, C. and W. Weaver, 1949, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  42. Szulanski, G., 1996, 'Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impedi-ments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm,' Strategic Management Journal 17, 27–43.Google Scholar
  43. Rochet, J. and J. Tirole, 2004, Two Sided Markets: An Over-view, Mimeo, University of Toulouse.Google Scholar
  44. Teece, D.J., 1976, The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer, Cam-bridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  45. Teece, D.J., 1977a, 'Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-how,' The Economic Journal 87, 242–261.Google Scholar
  46. Teece, D.J., 1977b, 'Time-Cost Tradeoffs: Elasticity Estimates and Determinants for International Technology Transfer Projects,' Management Science 23 (8), 830–837.Google Scholar
  47. Teece, D.J., 1980, 'The Diffusion of an Administrative Inno-vation,' Management Science 26 (5)(May), 464–470.Google Scholar
  48. Teece, D.J., 1981a, 'The Market for Know-how and the Effi-cient International Transfer of Technology,' The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science 458, 81–196.Google Scholar
  49. Teece, D.J., 1981b, The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considerations,' Sloan Man-agement Review 22 (3), 3–17.Google Scholar
  50. Teece, D.J., 1982, 'Towards an Economic Theory of the Mul-tiproduct Firm,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organi-zation 3, 39–33.Google Scholar
  51. Teece, D.J., 1985, 'Multinational Enterprise, Internal Gover-nance, and Industrial Organization,' American Economic Review 75 (2), 233–238.Google Scholar
  52. Teece, D.J., 1986, 'Pro ting from Technological Innovation,' Research Policy 15 (6), 285–305.Google Scholar
  53. Teece, D.J. and H. Chesbrough, 1996, 'Organizing for Inno-vation: When is Virtual Virtuous?,' Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  54. Williamson, O.E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Teece
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization Professor, Haas School of BusinessUniversity of CaliforniaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations