Journal of Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 204, Issue 6, pp 808–870 | Cite as

Classification of Integrable Cases in the Dynamics of a Four-Dimensional Rigid Body in a Nonconservative Field in the Presence of a Tracking Force

Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is a survey of integrable cases in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body under the action of a nonconservative force field. We review both new results and results obtained earlier. The problems examined are described by dynamical systems with so-called variable dissipation with zero mean.

The problem of a search for complete sets of transcendental first integrals of systems with dissipation is quite current; a large number of works are devoted to it. We introduce a new class of dynamical systems that have a periodic coordinate. Due to the existence of a nontrivial symmetry group of such systems, we can prove that these systems possess variable dissipation with zero mean, which means that on the average for a period with respect to the periodic coordinate, the dissipation in the system is equal to zero, although in various domains of the phase space, either energy pumping or dissipation can occur. Based on the results obtained, we analyze dynamical systems that appear in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body and obtain a series of new cases of complete integrability of the equations of motion in transcendental functions that can be expressed through a finite combination of elementary functions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. R. Aidagulov and M. V. Shamolin, “A phenomenological approach to the definition of interphase forces,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 412, No. 1, 44–47 (2007).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. R. Aidagulov and M. V. Shamolin, “Averaging operators and real equations of hydromechanics,” J. Math. Sci., 165, No. 6, 637–653 (2010).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. A. Andronov, Collection of Works [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. A. Andronov and L. S. Pontryagin, “Rough systems,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 14, No. 5, 247–250 (1937).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Appel, Theoretical Mechanics, Vols. I, II [Russian translation], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. I. Arnold, V. V. Kozlov, and A. I. Neishtadt, “Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics,” in: Progress in Science and Technology, Series on Contemporary Problems in Mathematics, Fundamental Direction [in Russian], Vol. 3, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. V. Belyaev, “On the motion of a multi-dimensional body with a clamped point in the gravity force field,” Mat. Sb., 114, No. 3, 465–470 (1981).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Bendixson, “Sur les courbes définies par les équations différentielles,” Acta Math., 24, 1–30 (1901).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. I. Bogoyavlenskii, “Some integrable cases of Euler equation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 287, No. 5, 1105–1108 (1986).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. I. Bogoyavlenskii and G. F. Ivakh, “Topological analysis of integrable cases of V. A. Steklov,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 40, No. 4, 145–146 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. D. Bryuno, Local Method of Nonlinear Analysis of Differential Equations [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. Bourbaki, Integration [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Bourbaki, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. S. Byushgens and R. V. Studnev, Dynamics of Longitudinal and Lateral Motion [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. S. Byushgens and R. V. Studnev, Dynamics of Aircrafts. Spatial Motion [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. A. Chaplygin, “On the motion of heavy bodies in an incompressible fluid,” In: A Complete Collection of Works [in Russian], Vol. 1, Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Leningrad (1933), pp. 133–135.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. A. Chaplygin, Selected Works [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov, and A. T. Fomenko, Modern Geometry. Theory and Applications [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Kinematics and mass geometry of a rigid body with a fixed point in ℝn,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 380, No. 1, 47–50 (2001).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Generalized dynamical Euler equations for a rigid body with a fixed point in ℝn,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 383, No. 5, 635–637 (2002).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “First integrals of equations of motion for a generalized gyroscope in ℝn,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 5, 37–41 (2003).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Valerii Vladimirovich Trofimov,” J. Math. Sci., 154, No. 4, 449–461 (2008).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Sessions of the workshop of the Mathematics and Mechanics Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University “Urgent problems of geometry and mechanics” named after V. V. Trofimov,” J. Math. Sci., 154, No. 4, 462–495 (2008).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Sessions of the workshop of the Mathematics and Mechanics Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University “Urgent problems of geometry and mechanics” named after V. V. Trofimov,” J. Math. Sci., 161, No. 5, 603–614 (2009).MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Sessions of the workshop of the Mathematics and Mechanics Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University, ‘Topical Problems of Geometry and Mechanics’ named after V. V. Trofimov,” J. Math. Sci., 165, No. 6, 607–615 (2010).MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Sessions of the workshop of the Mathematics and Mechanics Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University, ‘Urgent Problems of Geometry and Mechanics’ named after V. V. Trofimov,” J. Math. Sci., 187, No. 3, 269–271 (2012).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. V. Georgievskii and M. V. Shamolin, “Levi-Civita symbols, generalized vector products, and new integrable cases in mechanics of multidimensional bodies,” J. Math. Sci., 187, No. 3, 280–299 (2012).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. V. Golubev, Lectures on Analytic Theory of Differential Equations [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow–Leningrad (1950).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. V. Golubev, Lectures on Integration of Equations of Motion of a Heavy Rigid Body About a Fixed Point [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow–Leningrad (1953).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. I. Gurevich, Theory of Jets of an Ideal Liquid [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. A. Ivanova, “On Euler equations in models of theoretical physics,” Mat. Zametki, 52, No. 2, 43–51 (1992).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. G. J. Jacobi, Forlesungen über Dynamik, Druck und Verlag von G. Reimer, Berlin (1884).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    V. V. Kozlov, Qualitative Analysis Methods in Rigid Body Dynamics [In Russian], MGU, Moscow (1980).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. V. Kozlov, “Integrability and nonintegrability in Hamiltonian mechanics,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 38, No. 1, 3–67 (1983).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Lamb, Hydrodynamics [Russian translation], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1947).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    B. Ya. Lokshin, V. A. Privalov, and V. A. Samsonov, Introduction to the Problem on the Motion of a Body in a Resisting Medium [in Russian], Moscow State Univ., Moscow (1986).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. M. Lyapunov, “A new integrability case of equations of rigid body motion in a fluid,” In: A Collection of Works [in Russian], Vol. I, Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1954), pp. 320–324.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yu. I. Manin, “Algebraic aspects of theory of nonlinear differential equations,” in: Progress in Science and Technology, Series on Contemporary Problems in Mathematics [in Russian], Vol. 11, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1978), pp. 5–112.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Z. Nitecki, Differentiable Dynamics: An Introduction to the Orbit Structure of Diffeomorphisms, MIT Press (1971).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    H. Poincaré, On Curves Defined by Differential Equations [Russian translation], OGIZ, Moscow–Leningrad (1947).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. Poincaré, “New methods in celestial mechanics,” in: Selected Works [Russian translation], Vols. 1, 2, Nauka, Moscow (1971–1972).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    V. A. Samsonov and M. V. Shamolin, “On the problem of body motion in a resisting medium,” Vestn. MGU, Mat., Mekh., 3, 51–54 (1989).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. I. Sedov, Continuous Medium Mechanics [in Russian], Vols. 1, 2, Nauka, Moscow (1983–1984).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On the problem of body motion in a medium with resistance,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 1, 52–58 (1992).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Closed trajectories of different topological type in the problem of body motion in a medium with resistance,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 2, 52–56 (1992).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Classification of phase portraits in problem of body motion in a resisting medium in the presence of a linear damping moment,” Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 57, No. 4, 40–49 (1993).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Existence and uniqueness of trajectories having infinitely distant points as limit sets for dynamical systems on plane,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 1, 68–71 (1993).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Applications of Poincaré topographical system methods and comparison systems in some concrete systems of differential equations,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 2, 66–70 (1993).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new two-parameter family of phase portraits in the problem of body motion in a medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 337, No. 5, 611–614 (1994).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Introduction to problem of body drag in a resisting medium and a new two-parameter family of phase portraits,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 4, 57–69 (1996).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Variety of types of phase portraits in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a resisting medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 349, No. 2, 193–197 (1996).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Definition of relative roughness and two-parameter family of phase portraits in rigid body dynamics,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 51, No. 1, 175–176 (1996).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Periodic and Poisson stable trajectories in the problem of body motion in a resisting medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 2, 55–63 (1996).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On an integrable case in spatial dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 2, 65–68 (1997).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Spatial Poincar´e topographical systems and comparison systems,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 52, No. 3, 177–178 (1997).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Three-dimensional structural optimization of controlled rigid motion in a resisting medium,” in: Proc. WCSMO-2, Zakopane, Poland, May 26–30, 1997, Zakopane, Poland (1997), pp. 387–392.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On integrability in transcendental functions,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 53, No. 3, 209–210 (1998).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Family of portraits with limit cycles in plane dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 6, 29–37 (1998).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Some classical problems in a three-dimensional dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Proc. ICTACEM’98, Kharagpur, India, December 1–5, 1998, Indian Inst. of Technology, Kharagpur (1998).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Structural stability in 3D dynamics of a rigid body,” in: Proc. WCSMO-3, Buffalo, New York, May 17–21, 1999, Buffalo (1999).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Methods of nonlinear analysis in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Proc. Congr. “Nonlinear Analysis and Its Applications,” Moscow, Russia, September 1–5, 1998 [in Russian], Moscow (1999), pp. 497–508.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Certain classes of partial solutions in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 2, 178–189 (1999).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New Jacobi integrable cases in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 364, No. 5, 627–629 (1999).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On roughness of dissipative systems and relative roughness and non-roughness of variable dissipation systems,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 54, No. 5, 181–182 (1999).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new family of phase portraits in spatial dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 371, No. 4, 480–483 (2000).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Jacobi integrability in problem of four-dimensional rigid body motion in a resisting medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 375, No. 3, 343–346. (2000).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Comparison of certain integrability cases from two-, three-, and fourdimensional dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of V Crimean Int. Math. School “Lyapunov Function Method and Its Application,” Crimea, Alushta, September 5–13, 2000 [in Russian], Simferopol’ (2000), p. 169.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On a certain case of Jacobi integrability in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of Int. Conf. “Differential and Integral Equations,” Odessa, September 12–14, 2000 [in Russian], AstroPrint, Odessa (2000), pp. 294–295.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On limit sets of differential equations near singular points,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 55, No. 3, 187–188 (2000).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New families of many-dimensional phase portraits in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Proc. 16th IMACS World Congress, Lausanne, Switzerland, August 21–25, 2000, EPFL, Lausanne (2000).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Mathematical modelling of interaction of a rigid body with a medium and new cases of integrability,” in: Proc. ECCOMAS, Barcelona, Spain, September 11–14, 2000, Barcelona (2000).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Integrability of a problem of a four-dimensional rigid body in a resisting medium,” in: Abstracts of Sessions of Workshop “current Problems of Geometry and Mechanics,” Fund. Prikl. Mat., 7, No. 1, 309 (2001).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable cases in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of Scientific Conference, May 22–25, 2001 [in Russian], Kiev (2001), p. 344.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New Jacobi integrable cases in dynamics of a two-, three-, and four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of VIII All-Russian Congress “Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,” Perm’, August 23–29, 2001 [in Russian], Ural Department of Russian Academy of Science, Ekaterinburg (2001), pp. 599–600.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On stability of motion of a body twisted around its longitudinal axis in a resisting medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela 1, 189–193 (2001).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Complete integrability of equations for motion of a spatial pendulum in overrunning medium flow,” Vestn. MGU, Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., 5, 22–28 (2001).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Integrability cases of equations for spatial dynamics of a rigid body,” Prikl. Mekh., 37, No. 6, 74–82 (2001).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable cases in dynamics of a two-, three-, and four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of Int. Conf. “Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems,” Suzdal’, July 1–6, 2002 [in Russian], Vladimir State University, Vladimir (2002), pp. 142–144.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Some questions of the qualitative theory of ordinary differential equations and dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” J. Math. Sci., 110, No. 2, 2526–2555 (2002).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable cases and families of portraits in the plane and spatial dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” J. Math. Sci., 114, No. 1, 919–975 (2003).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Geometric representation of motion in a certain problem of body interaction with a medium,” Prikl. Mekh., 40, No. 4, 137–144 (2004).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Classes of variable dissipation systems with nonzero mean in the dynamics of a rigid body,” J. Math. Sci., 122, No. 1, 2841–2915 (2004).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of complete integrability in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Reports of International Conference “Functional Spaces, Approximation Theory, and Nonlinear Analysis” Devoted to the 100th Anniversary of S. M. Nikol’skii, Moscow, May 23–29, 2005 [in Russian], V. A. Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (2005), p. 244.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On a certain integrable case in dynamics on so(4) ×4,” in: Abstracts of Reports of All-Russian Conference “Differential Equations and Their Applications,” Samara, June 27–July 2, 2005 [in Russian], Univers-Grupp, Samara (2005), pp. 97–98.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On a certain integrable case of equations of dynamics in so(4) ×4,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 60, No. 6, 233–234 (2005).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A case of complete integrability in spatial dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium taking into account rotational derivatives of force moment in angular velocity,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 403, No. 4, 482–485 (2005).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Comparison of Jacobi integrable cases of plane and spatial body motions in a medium under streamline flow around,” Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 69, No. 6, 1003–1010 (2005).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Structural stable vector fields in rigid body dynamics,” in: Proc. 8th Conf. “Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications,” Lodz, Poland, December 12–15, 2005, 1, Tech. Univ. Lodz, Lodz (2005), pp. 429–436.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On the problem of the motion of a rigid body in a resisting medium,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 3, 45–57 (2006).Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On a case of complete integrability in four-dimensional rigid body dynamics,” in: Abstracts of Reports of International Conference “Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems,” Vladimir, July 10–15, 2006 [in Russian], Vladimir State University, Vladimir (2006), pp. 226–228.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    M. V. Shamolin, Methods for Analysis of Variable Dissipation Dynamical Systems in Rigid Body Dynamics [in Russian], Ekzamen, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Some model problems of dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Prikl. Mekh., 43, No. 10, 49–67 (2007).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable cases in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Abstracts of Sessions of Workshop “Current Problems of Geometry and Mechanics,” J. Math. Sci., 154, No. 4, 462–495 (2008).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On integrability of motion of four-dimensional body-pendulum situated in over-running medium flow,” in: Abstracts of Sessions of Workshop “Current Problems of Geometry and Mechanics,” J. Math. Sci., 154, No. 4, 462–495 (2008).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A case of complete integrability in dynamics on a tangent bundle of a twodimensional sphere,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 62, No. 5, 169–170 (2007).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Complete integrability of equations of motion for a spatial pendulum in medium flow taking into account rotational derivatives of moment of its action force,” Izv. Ross Akad. Nauk, Mekh. Tverdogo Tela, 3, 187–192 (2007).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Case of complete integrability in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconcervative force field,” in: Abstracts of Reports of Int. Congress “Nonlinear Dynamical Analysis-2007,” St. Petersburg, June 4–8, 2007 [in Russian], St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg (2007), p. 178.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of complete integrability in dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative force field,” In: Abstracts of Reports of Int. Conf. “Analysis and Singularities” dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of V. I. Arnold, August 20–24, 2007, Moscow [in Russian], MIAN, Moscow (2007), pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A case of complete integrability in dynamics on a tangent bundle of two-dimensional sphere,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 62, No. 5, 169–170 (2007).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    M. V. Shamolin, “4D rigid body and some cases of integrability,” in: Abstr. ICIAM07, Zürich, Switzerland, June 16–20, 2007, ETH, Zürich (2007), pp. 311.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    M. V. Shamolin, “The cases of integrability in a 2D-, 3D- and 4D-rigid body,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Dynamical Methods and Mathematical Modelling,” Valladolid, Spain, September 18–22, 2007, ETSII, Valladolid (2007), pp. 31.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of integrability in terms of transcendental functions in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Proc. 9th Conf. “Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications,” Lodz, Poland, December 17–20, 2007, 1, Tech. Univ. Lodz, Lodz (2007), pp. 415–422.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Dynamical systems with variable dissipation: approaches, methods, and applications,” J. Dynam. Sci., 162, No. 6, 741–908 (2008).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable cases in the dynamics of a body interacting with a medium taking into account the dependence of the moment of the resistance force on the angular velocity,” Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 72, No. 2, 273–287 (2008).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New integrable case in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Voronezh Spring Math. School “Pontryagin Readings–XIX,” Voronezh, May 2008, Voronezh State Univ., Voronezh (2008), pp. 231–232.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New cases of complete integrability in the dynamics of a symmetric four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Contemporary Problems of Mathematics, Mechanics, and Informatics” dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of L. A. Tolokonnikov, Tula, November 17–21, 2008, Grif, Tula (2008), pp. 317–320.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On the integrability in elementary functions of some classes of dynamical systems,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 1, Mat. Mekh., 3, 43–49 (2008).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Three-parameter family of phase portraits in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 418, No. 1. 46–51 (2008).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Methods of analysis of dynamic systems with various dissipation in dynamics of a rigid body,” Proc. ENOC-2008, June 30–July 4, 2008, St. Petersburg, Russia (2008).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Some methods of analysis of dynamical systems with various dissipation in dynamics of a rigid body,” PAMM, 8, 10137–10138 (2008).Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    M. V. Shamolin, “The various cases of complete integrability in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: CD-Proc. ECCOMAS Thematic Conf. “Multibody Dynamics,” Warsaw, Poland, June 29–July 2. 2009, Polish Acad. Sci., Warsaw (2009).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On the integrability in elementary functions of some classes of nonconservative dynamical systems,” J. Math. Sci., 161, No. 5, 734–778 (2009).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New cases of integrability in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Semin. “Current Problems of Geometry and Mechanics,” J. Math. Sci., 165, No. 6, 607–615 (2009).Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of the complete integrability in the dynamics of a symmetric four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Semin. “Current Problems of Geometry and Mechanics,” J. Math. Sci., 165, No. 6, 607–615 (2009).Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Classification of cases of complete integrability in the dynamics of a symmetric four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” J. Math. Sci., 165, No. 6, 743–754 (2009).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New cases of complete integrability in the dynamics of a dynamically symmetric four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 425, No. 3, 338–342 (2009).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of integrability of the equations of motion of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Contemporary Problems of Mathematics, Mechanics, and Their Applications” dedicated to the 70th Anniversary of Prof. V. A. Sadovnichy, Moscow, March 30–April 2, 2009, Univ. Kniga, Moscow (2009), p. 233.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Dynamical systems with variable dissipation: methods and applications,” in: Proc. 10th Conf. “Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications,” Poland, Lodz, December 7–10, 2009, Tech. Univ. Lodz, Lodz (2009), pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New cases of integrability in dynamics of a rigid body with the cone form of its shape interacting with a medium,” PAMM, 9, 139–140 (2009).Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Dynamical systems with various dissipation: background, methods, applications,” in: CD-Proc. XXXVIII Summer School-Conf. “Advanced Problems in Mechanics,” St. Petersburg (Repino), Russia, July 1–5, 2010, IPME, St. Petersburg (2010), pp. 612–621.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Integrability and nonintegrability in terms of transcendental functions in dynamics of a rigid body,” PAMM, 10, 63–64 (2010).Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    M. V. Shamolin, “New cases of the integrability in the spatial dynamics of a rigid body,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 431, No. 3, 339–343 (2010).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Spatial motion of a rigid body in a resisting medium,” Prikl. Mekh., 46, No. 7, 120–133 (2010).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of complete integrability of the equations of motion of a dynamically symmetric four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems,” Suzdal’, July 2–7, 2010, Vladimir State Univ., Vladimir (2010), pp. 195.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A case of complete integrability in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” Usp. Mat. Nauk, 65, No. 1, 189–190 (2010).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Motion of a rigid body in a resisting medium,” Mat. Model., 23, No. 12, 79–104 (2011).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    M. V. Shamolin, “On a multi-parameter family of phase portraits in the dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 1, Mat. Mekh., 3, 24–30 (2011).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new case of integrability in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 437, No. 2, 190–193 (2011).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new case of complete integrability of dynamical equations on the tangent bundle of the three-dimensional sphere,” Vestn. Samar. State Univ., Estestvennonauch. Ser., Miscellanious, 5, 187–189 (2011).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Complete lists of first integrals in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. dedicated to the 110th birthday of Prof. I. G. Petrovsky, Moscow State Univ., Moscow (2011), pp. 389–390.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Complete list of first integrals in the problem on the motion of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field under a linear damping,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 440, No. 2, 187–190 (2011).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Comparison of complete integrability cases in dynamics of two-, three-, and four-dimensional rigid bodies in a nonconservative field,” in: Proc. XV Int. Conf. “Dynamical System Modelling and Stability Investigation,” May 25–27, 2011, Kiev (2011), pp. 139.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of complete integrability in transcendental functions in dynamics and certain invariant indices,” in: CD-Proc. 5th Int. Sci. Conf. “Physics and Control” (PHYSCON 2011), Leon, September 5–8, 2011, Leon, Spain (2011).Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Variety of cases of integrability in dynamics of a 2D-, 3D-, and 4D-rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: Proc. 11th Conf. “Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications,” Lodz, Poland, December 5–8, 2011, Tech. Univ. Lodz, Lodz (2011), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Variety of cases of integrability in dynamics of a 2D- and 3D-rigid body interacting with a medium,” in: CD-Proc. 8th ESMC 2012, Graz, Austria, July 9–13, 2012, Graz (2012).Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of integrability in dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a resistant medium,” CD-Proc. 23th Int. Congr. “Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,” August 19–24, 2012, Beijing, China, : China Science Literature Publishing House, Beijing (2012).Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Problem on the motion of a body in a resisting medium taking into account the dependence of the moment of the resistance on the angular velocity,” Mat. Model., 24, No. 10, 109–132 (2012).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Comparison of complete integrability cases in dynamics of a two-, three-, and four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” J. Math. Sci., 187, No. 3, 346–359 (2012).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Some questions of qualitative theory in dynamics of systems with variable dissipation,” J. Math. Sci., 189, No. 2, 314–323 (2013).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new case of integrability in the spatial dynamics of a rigid body interacting with a medium taking into account linear damping,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 442, No. 4, 479–481 (2012).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    M. V. Shamolin, “A new case of integrability in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field taking into account linear damping,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 444, No. 5, 506–509 (2012).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Cases of integrability in the dynamics of a four-dimensional rigid body in a nonconservative field,” Proc. Int. Conf. “Voronezh Winter Mat. School of G. G. Krein,” Voronezh, January 25–30, 2012, Voronezh State Univ., Voronezh (2012), pp. 213–215.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Review of cases of integrability in the dynamics of lower- and higher-dimensional rigid bodies in nonconservative fields,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. “Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems,” Suzdal’, June 29–July 4, 2012, Vladimir State Univ., Vladimir (2012), pp. 179–180.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    M. V. Shamolin, “Complete list of first integrals of dynamical equations of motion of a rigid body in a resisting medium taking into account linear damping,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 1, Mat. Mekh., 4, 44–47 (2012).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    V. A. Steklov, On the Motion of a Rigid Body in a Fluid [in Russian], Khar’kov (1893).Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    G. K. Suslov, Theoretical Mechanics [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow (1946).Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    V. V. Trofimov, “Euler equations on finite-dimensional solvable Lie groups,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat., 44, No. 5, 1191–1199 (1980).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    V. V. Trofimov and A. T. Fomenko, “ A methodology for constructing Hamiltonian flows on symmetric spaces and integrability of certain hydrodynamic systems,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 254, No. 6, 1349–1353 (1980).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    V. V. Trofimov and M. V. Shamolin, “Geometric and dynamical invariants of integrable Hamiltonian and dissipative systems,” J. Math. Sci., 180, No. 4, 365–530 (2012).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    S. V. Vishik and S. F. Dolzhanskii, “Analogs of Euler–Poisson equations and magnetic electrodynamic related to Lie groups,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 238, No. 5, 1032–1035.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    E. T. Whittaker, A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies. With an Introduction to the Problem of Three Bodies, At the University Press, Cambridge (1960).MATHGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    N. E. Zhukovsky, “On the fall of a light oblong body rotating about its longitudinal axis,” in: Complete Works [in Russian], Vol. 5, Fizmatlit, Moscow (1937), pp. 72–80, 100–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mechanics of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations