# Noncommutative geometry and classification of elliptic operators

- 50 Downloads

## Abstract

The computation of a stable homotopic classification of elliptic operators is an important problem of elliptic theory. The classical solution of this problem is given by Atiyah and Singer for the case of smooth compact manifolds. It is formulated in terms of *K*-theory for a cotangent fibering of the given manifold. It cannot be extended for the case of nonsmooth manifolds because their cotangent fiberings do not contain all necessary information. Another Atiyah definition might fit in such a case: it is based on the concept of abstract elliptic operators and is given in term of *K*-homologies of the manifold itself (instead of its fiberings). Indeed, this theorem is recently extended for manifolds with conic singularities, ribs, and general so-called stratified manifolds: it suffices just to replace the phrase “smooth manifold” by the phrase “stratified manifold” (of the corresponding class). Thus, stratified manifolds is a strange phenomenon in a way: the algebra of symbols of differential (pseudodifferential) operators is quite noncommutative on such manifolds (the symbol components corresponding to strata of positive codimensions are operator-valued functions), but the solution of the classification problem can be found in purely geometric terms. In general, it is impossible for other classes of nonsmooth manifolds. In particular, the authors recently found that, for manifolds with angles, the classification is given by a *K*-group of a noncommutative *C** -algebra and it cannot be reduced to a commutative algebra if normal fiberings of faces of the considered manifold are nontrivial. Note that the proofs are based on noncommutative geometry (more exactly, the *K*-theory of *C** -algebras) even in the case of stratified manifolds though the results are “classical.” In this paper, we provide a review of the abovementioned classification results for elliptic operators on manifolds with singularities and corresponding methods of noncommutative geometry (in particular, the localization principle in *C** -algebras).

## Keywords

Manifold Elliptic Operator Smooth Manifold Fredholm Operator Noncommutative Geometry## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.M. S. Agranovich and M. I. Vishik, “Elliptic problems with a parameter and parabolic problems of general type,”
*Uspekhi Mat. Nauk*,**19**, No. 3(117), 53–161 (1964).MATHGoogle Scholar - 2.A. Antonevich and A. Lebedev,
*Functional Differential Equations. I. C*-Theory*, Longman, Harlow (1994).Google Scholar - 3.A. Antonevich and A. Lebedev,
*Functional Differential Equations. II. C*-Applications. Parts 1-2*, Longman, Harlow (1998).Google Scholar - 4.W. Arveson,
*An Invitation to C*-Algebras*, Springer-Verlag, New York–Heidelberg–Berlin (1976).MATHGoogle Scholar - 5.M. F. Atiyah, “Global theory of elliptic operators,”
*Proc. Internat. Conf. on Functional Analysis and Related Topics (Tokyo, 1969)*,*Univ. of Tokyo Press*, Tokyo, 21–30 (1970).Google Scholar - 6.M. F. Atiyah and R. Bott, “The index problem for manifolds with boundary,”
*Differential Analysis, Bombay Colloq.*,*Oxford Univ. Press*, London, 175–186 (1964).Google Scholar - 7.M. F. Atiyah and I.M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators on compact manifolds,”
*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.*,**69**, 422–433 (1963).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 8.P. Baum and R.G. Douglas, “
*K*-homology and index theory,”*Operator algebras and applications, Part I (Kingston, Ont., 1980)*,*Amer. Math. Soc.*, Providence, R.I., 117–173 (1982).Google Scholar - 9.B. Blackadar,
*K-Theory for Operator Algebras*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).MATHGoogle Scholar - 10.L. Brown, R. Douglas, and P. Fillmore, “Extensions of
*C**-algebras and*K*-homology,”*Ann. Math. 2*,**105**, 265–324 (1977).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 11.J. Dauns and K.H. Hofmann,
*Representation of Rings by Sections*, AMS, Providence (1968).Google Scholar - 12.J. Dixmier,
*Les C*-Algebres et Leurs Representations*, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1969).Google Scholar - 13.Yu. Egorov and B.-W. Schulze,
*Pseudo-Differential Operators, Singularities, Applications*, Birkhäuser, Boston–Basel–Berlin (1997).MATHGoogle Scholar - 14.I. Gohberg and N. Krupnik,
*One-Dimensional Linear Singular Integral Equations. I, II*, Birkhäuser, Basel (1992).Google Scholar - 15.P. Haskell, “Index theory of geometric Fredholm operators on varieties with isolated singularities,”
*K-Theory*,**1**, No. 5, 457–466 (1987).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 16.N. Higson and J. Roe,
*Analytic K-Homology*, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).MATHGoogle Scholar - 17.G. G. Kasparov, “Topological invariants of elliptic operators. I,”
*Izv. Math.*,**9**, No. 4, 751–792 (1976).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 18.G. Kasparov, “Equivariant
*KK*-theory and the Novikov conjecture,”*Inv. Math.*,**91**, No. 1, 147–201 (1988).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 19.V. A. Kondratiev, “Boundary-value problems for elliptic equations in domains with conical and angular points,”
*Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs.*,**16**, 209–292 (1967).Google Scholar - 20.R. Lauter and S. Moroianu, “The index of cusp operators on manifolds with corners,”
*Ann. Global Anal. Geom.*,**21**, No. 1, 31–49 (2002).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 21.P.-Y. Le Gall and B. Monthubert, “
*K*-theory of the indicial algebra of a manifold with corners,”*K-Theory*,**23**, No. 2, 105–113 (2001).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 22.V.P. Maslov,
*Operator Methods*[in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar - 23.R. Mazzeo, “Elliptic theory of differential edge operators. I,”
*Comm. Partial Differential Equations*,**10**, 1615–1664 (1991).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 24.S. T. Melo, R. Nest, and E. Schrohe, “
*C**-structure and*K*-theory of Boutet de Monvel’s algebra,”*J. Reine Angew. Math.*,**561**, 145–175 (2003).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 25.R. Melrose, “Transformation of boundary problems,”
*Acta Math.*,**147**, 149–236 (1981).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 26.R. Melrose, “Analysis on manifolds with corners. Lecture Notes,” Preprint MIT, Cambrige (1988).Google Scholar
- 27.R. Melrose, “Pseudodifferential operators, corners, and singular limits,”
*Proc. Internat. Cong. of Mathematicians (Kyoto)*,*Springer*, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 217–234 (1990).Google Scholar - 28.R. Melrose and G.A. Mendoza, “Elliptic boundary problems in spaces with conical points,”
*Proc. Journees “Equ. D´eriv. Part.”*, St. Jean-de-Monts, Conf. 4, 1–21 (1981).Google Scholar - 29.R. Melrose and V. Nistor, “
*K*-theory of*C**-algebras of*b*-pseudodifferential operators,”*Geom. Funct. Anal.*,**8**, No. 1, 88–122 (1998).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 30.R. Melrose and P. Piazza, “Analytic
*K*-theory on manifolds with corners,”*Adv. Math.*,**92**, No. 1, 1–26 (1992).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 31.R. Melrose and F. Rochon, “Index in
*K*-theory for families of fibred cusp operators,”*ArXiv: math.DG/0507590*(2005).Google Scholar - 32.B. Monthubert, “Pseudodifferential calculus on manifolds with corners and groupoids,”
*Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.*,**127**, No. 10, 2871–2881 (1999).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 33.B. Monthubert, “Groupoids of manifolds with corners and index theory,”
*Contemp. Math.*,**282**, 147–157 (2001).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 34.B. Monthubert, “Groupoids and pseudodifferential calculus on manifolds with corners,”
*J. Funct. Anal.*,**199**, No. 1, 243–286 (2003).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 35.B. Monthubert and V. Nistor, “A topological index theorem for manifolds with corners,”
*ArXiv: math.KT/0507601*(2005).Google Scholar - 36.V. Nazaikinskii, G. Rozenblioum, A. Savin, and B. Sternin, “Guillemin transform and Toeplitz representations for operators on singular manifolds,”
*Spectral Geometry of Manifolds with Boundary*,*AMS*, Providence, 281–306 (2005).Google Scholar - 37.V. Nazaikinskii, A. Savin, B.-W. Schulze, and B. Sternin,
*Elliptic Theory on Singular Manifolds*, CRC-Press, Boca Raton (2005).Google Scholar - 38.V. Nazaikinskii, A. Savin, and B. Sternin, “Elliptic theory on manifolds with corners. I. Dual manifolds and pseudodifferential operators,”
*ArXiv: math.OA/0608353*(2006).Google Scholar - 39.V. Nazaikinskii, A. Savin, and B. Sternin, “Elliptic theory on manifolds with corners. II. Homotopy classification of elliptic operators,”
*ArXiv: math.OA/0608354*(2006).Google Scholar - 40.V. Nazaikinskii, A. Savin, and B. Sternin, “On the homotopy classification of elliptic operators on stratified manifolds,”
*ArXiv: math.KT/0608332*(2006).Google Scholar - 41.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, and B. Yu. Sternin, “On the homotopy classification of elliptic operators on stratified manifolds,”
*Dokl. Akad. Nauk*,**408**, No. 5, 591–595 (2006).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 42.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, and B. Yu. Sternin, “Pseudodifferential operators on stratified manifolds. I, II,”
*Differ. Equ.*,**45**, No. 4-5, 536–549, 685–696 (2007).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 43.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, and B. Yu. Sternin, “On the homotopy classification of elliptic operators on manifolds with corners,”
*Dokl. Math.*,**75**, No. 2, 186–189 (2007).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 44.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, and B. Yu. Sternin, “On general localization principle in
*C**- algebras,” to appear.Google Scholar - 45.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, and B. Yu. Sternin, “Homotopy classification of elliptic operators on manifolds with corners,” to appear.Google Scholar
- 46.V. E. Nazaikinskii, A. Yu. Savin, B. Yu. Sternin, and B.-V. Shul’tse, “On the index of elliptic operators on manifolds with edges,”
*Sb. Math.*,**196**, No. 9-10, 1271–1305 (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 47.W. L. Paschke, “
*K*-theory for commutants in the Calkin algebra,”*Pacific J. Math.*,**95**, No. 2, 427–434 (1981).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 48.G. K. Pedersen,
*C*-Algebras and Their Automorphism Groups*, Academic Press, London–New York (1979).MATHGoogle Scholar - 49.B. A. Plamenevskiĭ and V. N. Senichkin, “Solvable operator algebras,”
*St. Petersburg Math. J.*,**6**, No. 5, 895–968 (1995).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 50.B. A. Plamenevskiĭ and V. N. Senichkin, “On a class of pseudodifferential operators on ℝ
^{m}and on stratified manifolds,”*Sb. Math.*,**191**, No. 5-6, 725–757 (2000).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 51.B. A. Plamenevskiĭ and V. N. Senichkin, “Representations of
*C**-algebras of pseudodifferential operators on piecewise-smooth manifolds,”*St. Petersburg Math. J.*,**13**, No. 6, 993–1032 (2002).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 52.A. Savin, “Elliptic operators on singular manifolds and
*K*-homology,”*K-Theory*,**34**, No. 1, 71–98 (2005).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 53.B.-W. Schulze,
*Pseudodifferential Operators on Manifolds with Singularities*, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991).Google Scholar - 54.B.-W. Schulze, B. Sternin, and V. Shatalov, “Structure rings of singularities and differential equations,”
*Differential Equations, Asymptotic Analysis, and Mathematical Physics*,*Akademie Verlag*, Berlin, 325–347 (1996).Google Scholar - 55.B.-W. Schulze, B. Sternin, and V. Shatalov,
*Differential Equations on Singular Manifolds. Semiclassical Theory and Operator Algebras*,*Wiley-VCH Verlag*, Berlin–New York (1998).Google Scholar - 56.I. B. Simonenko, “A new general method of investigating linear operator equations of singular integral equation type. I, II,”
*Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.*,**29**, 567–586, 757–782 (1965).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 57.N. L. Vasilevskiĭ, “Locality principles in operator theory,”
*Abstr. Northern-Caucasus Regional Conference “Linear Operators in Function Spaces,”*Grozny (1989), 32-33.Google Scholar - 58.N. Vasilevski, “Convolution operators on standard CR-manifolds. II. “Algebras of convolution operators on the Heisenberg group,”
*Integr. Equat. Oper. Theory*,**19**, No. 3, 327–348 (1994).MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar