Advertisement

Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications

, Volume 180, Issue 2, pp 651–670 | Cite as

Gauss–Seidel Method for Multi-leader–follower Games

  • Atsushi Hori
  • Masao FukushimaEmail author
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The multi-leader–follower game has many applications such as the bilevel structured market in which two or more enterprises, called leaders, have initiatives, and the other firms, called followers, observe the leaders’ decisions and then decide their own strategies. A special case of the game is the Stackelberg model, or the single-leader–follower game, which has been studied for many years. The Stackelberg game may be reformulated as a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints, which has also been studied extensively in recent years. On the other hand, the multi-leader–follower game may be formulated as an equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints, in which each leader’s problem is an mathematical program with equilibrium constraints. However, finding an equilibrium point of an equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints is much more difficult than solving a single mathematical program with equilibrium constraints, because each leader’s problem contains those variables which are common to other players’ problems. Moreover, the constraints of each leader’s problem depend on the other rival leaders’ strategies. In this paper, we propose a Gauss–Seidel type algorithm with a penalty technique for solving an equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints associated with the multi-leader–follower game, and then suggest a refinement procedure to obtain more accurate solutions. We discuss convergence of the algorithm and report some numerical results to illustrate the behavior of the algorithm.

Keywords

Multi-leader–follower game Equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints S-stationary B-stationary 

Mathematics Subject Classification

91A06 91A10 90C33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to an anonymous referee for careful reading of the manuscript and helpful comments. This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (26330029) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

  1. 1.
    Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in \(n\)-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36, 48–49 (1950)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nash, J.: Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54, 286–295 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Stackelberg, H.: Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Springer, Berlin (1934)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    He, X., Prasad, A., Sethi, S., Gutierrez, G.: A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 16(4), 385–413 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luo, Z., Pang, J., Ralph, D.: Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1966)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Outrata, J., Kočvara, M., Zowe, J.: Nonsmooth Approach to Optimization Problems with Equilibrium Constraints. Applications and Numerical Results. Springer, Berlin (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Y., Hobbs, B., Leyffer, S., Munson, M.: Leader–follower equilibria for electric power and NO\(_{x}\) allowances markets. Comput. Manag. Sci. 3, 307–330 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hobbs, B., Metzler, C., Pang, J.: Strategic gaming analysis for electric power networks: an MPEC approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15, 638–645 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leyffer, S., Munson, T.: Solving multi-leader-common-follower games. Optim. Methods Softw. 25(4), 601–623 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pang, J., Fukushima, M.: Quasi-variational inequalities, generalized Nash equilibria, and multi-leader–follower games. Comput. Manag. Sci. 2, 21–56 (2006). Erratum. ibid., 6, 373–375 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, M., Fukushima, M.: Variational inequality formulation of a class of multi-leader–follower games. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 151, 455–473 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, M., Fukushima, M.: Multi-leader–follower games: models, methods and applications. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn 58(1), 1–23 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu, M., Fukushima, M.: Smoothing approach to Nash equilibrium formulations for a class of equilibrium problems with shared complementarity constraints. Comput. Optim. Appl. 52, 415–437 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Outrata, J.: A note on a class of equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints. Kybernetika 40(5), 585–594 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Su, C.: A sequential NCP algorithm for solving equilibrium problems with equilibrium constraints. Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Tech. rep. (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, X., Yang, X., Zhu, D.: A sequential smooth penalization approach to mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 27(1), 71–98 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scheel, H., Scholtes, S.: Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints: stationality, optimality, and sensitivity. Math. Oper. Res. 25(1), 1–22 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Facchinei, F., Soares, J.: A new merit function for nonlinear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 7, 225–247 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems and Mathematical Sciences, Graduate School of Science and EngineeringNanzan UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations