Advertising and Quality-Dependent Word-of-Mouth in a Contagion Sales Model

  • Fouad El OuardighiEmail author
  • Gustav Feichtinger
  • Dieter Grass
  • Richard F. Hartl
  • Peter M. Kort


In the literature on marketing models, the assumption of mixed word-of-mouth has been limited to the Bass diffusion model. Yet explicit leveraging of the originating factors of such assumption is lacking. Apart from that example, mixed word-of-mouth has been disregarded in contagion sales models. This paper bridges the gap by suggesting a sales model, where both positive and negative word-of-mouth affect the attraction rate of new customers, along with advertising. The difference between positive and negative word-of-mouth is based on the distinction between satisfied and dissatisfied current customers, which is supposed to depend on conformance quality. A primary issue in this paper is to determine how a firm should determine the optimal intertemporal trade-off between investing in advertising-dependent word-of-mouth and quality-dependent word-of-mouth. To address this issue, a contagion sales model is suggested where mixed autonomous word-of-mouth alone can lead to either commercial success or failure of a given brand.


Sales Word-of-mouth Advertising effort Conformance quality 

Mathematics Subject Classification

49N90 90B60 49N10 



This research was supported by the Centre for Research of ESSEC Business School (France), the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under Grants Nos. P25979-N25 and P23084-N13 and FWO Project G.0809.12N (Belgium). The authors acknowledge very helpful comments from two anonymous referees. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. 1.
    Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Moldovan, S., Muller, E.: The NPV of bad news. Int. J. Res. Mark. 24(3), 186–200 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richins, M.: Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied customers: A pilot study. J. Mark. 47(1), 68–78 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, E.W.: Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. J. Serv. Res. 1(1), 5–17 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sundaram, D.S., Webster, C.: The role of brand familiarity on the impact of word-of-mouth communication on brand evaluations. Adv. Consum. Res. 26(1), 664–670 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahluwalia, R.: How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? J. Consum. Res. 29(2), 270–279 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 44(3), 345–354 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahajan, V., Muller, E., Kerin, R.A.: Introduction strategy for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Manag. Sci. 39(12), 1389–1404 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moldovan, S., Goldenberg, J.: Cellular automata modeling of resistance to innovation: effects and solutions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 71(5), 425–442 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R.F., Sethi, S.P.: Dynamic optimal control methods in advertising: recent developments. Manag. Sci. 40(2), 195–226 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, J., Leng, M., Liang, L.: Recent developments in dynamic advertising research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220(3), 591–609 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson, P.: Information and consumer behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 78(2), 311–329 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garvin, D.: Managing Quality. Free Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trusov, M., Bucklin, R.E., Pauwels, K.: Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. J. Mark. 73(5), 90–102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stephen, A.T., Toubia, O.: Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Mark. Res. 47(2), 215–228 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moe, W.W., Trusov, M.: The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Mark. Res. 48(3), 444–456 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berger, J., Schwartz, E.M.: What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Mark. Res. 48(5), 869–880 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berger, J., Milkman, K.L.: What makes online content viral? J. Mark. Res. 49(2), 192–205 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shrihari, S., Srinivasan, R.: Social influence effects in online product ratings. J. Mark. 76(5), 70–88 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Libai, B., Muller, E., Peres, R.: Decomposing the value of word-of-mouth seeding programs: Acceleration versus expansion. J. Mark. Res. 50(2), 161–176 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheth, J.N., Sisodia, R.S.: Marketing productivity—issues and analysis. J. Bus. Res. 55(5), 349–362 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rust, R.T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G.S., Kumar, V., Srivastava, R.K.: Measuring marketing productivity: current knowledge and future directions. J. Mark. 68(4), 76–89 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malhotra, M.K., Sharma, S.: Spanning the continuum between marketing and operations. J. Oper. Manag. 20(3), 209–219 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tang, C.: A review of marketing-operations interface models: from co-existence to coordination and collaboration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 125(1), 22–40 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tapiero, C.S.: Optimal product quality and advertising. INFOR 19(4), 311–318 (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ringbeck, J.: Mixed quality and advertising strategies under asymmetric information. In: Feichtinger, G. (ed.) Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 197–214. North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    El Ouardighi, F., Pasin, F.: Quality improvement and goodwill accumulation in a dynamic duopoly. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175(2), 1021–1032 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El Ouardighi, F., Jørgensen, S., Pasin, F.: A dynamic game model of operations and marketing management in a supply chain. Int. Game Theory Rev. 10(4), 373–397 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    El Ouardighi, F., Jørgensen, S., Pasin, F.: A dynamic game with monopolist manufacturer and price-competing duopolist retailers. OR Spectrum 35(4), 1059–1084 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gould, J.P.: Diffusion processes and optimal advertising policy. In: Phelps, E.S. (ed.) Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, pp. 338–368. Norton, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kotowitz, Y., Mathewson, F.: Advertising, consumer information and product quality. Bell J. Econ. 10(2), 566–588 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fruchter, G.E.: Signaling quality: a dynamic price-advertising model. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 143(3), 479–496 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spremann, K.: The signaling of quality by reputation. In: Feichtinger, G. (ed.) Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 235–252. North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nelson, P.: Advertising as information. J. Polit. Econ. 82(4), 729–754 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sethi, S.P.: Optimal advertising with the contagion model. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 29(4), 615–627 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mahajan, V., Muller, E.: Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Mark. Sci. 5(2), 89–106 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Feinberg, F.M.: On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Manag. Sci. 47(11), 1476–1487 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li, G., Rajagopalan, S.: Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Manag. Sci. 44(11), 1517–1532 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chand, S., Moskowitz, H., Novak, A., Rekhi, I., Sorger, G.: Capacity allocation for dynamic process improvement with quality and demand considerations. Oper. Res. 44(6), 964–975 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    El Ouardighi, F., Kogan, K.: Dynamic conformance and design quality in a supply chain: an assessment of contracts’ coordination power. Ann. Oper. Res. 211(1), 137–166 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mollenkopf, D.A., Frankel, R., Russo, I.: Creating value through returns management: exploring the marketing-operations interface. J. Oper. Manag. 29(5), 5391–5403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jørgensen, S., Zaccour, G.: Differential Games in Marketing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grass, D., Caulkins, J.P., Feichtinger, G., Tragler, G., Behrens, D.A.: Optimal Control of Nonlinear Processes with Applications in Drugs, Corruption, and Terror. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grass, D.: Numerical computation of the optimal vector field: exemplified by a fishery model. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36(10), 1626–1658 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fouad El Ouardighi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gustav Feichtinger
    • 2
  • Dieter Grass
    • 2
  • Richard F. Hartl
    • 3
  • Peter M. Kort
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy PontoiseFrance
  2. 2.Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  3. 3.University of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  5. 5.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations