Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications

, Volume 146, Issue 2, pp 267–303 | Cite as

Hybrid Approximate Proximal Method with Auxiliary Variational Inequality for Vector Optimization

Article

Abstract

This paper studies a general vector optimization problem of finding weakly efficient points for mappings from Hilbert spaces to arbitrary Banach spaces, where the latter are partially ordered by some closed, convex, and pointed cones with nonempty interiors. To find solutions of this vector optimization problem, we introduce an auxiliary variational inequality problem for a monotone and Lipschitz continuous mapping. The approximate proximal method in vector optimization is extended to develop a hybrid approximate proximal method for the general vector optimization problem under consideration by combining an extragradient method to find a solution of the variational inequality problem and an approximate proximal point method for finding a root of a maximal monotone operator. In this hybrid approximate proximal method, the subproblems consist of finding approximate solutions to the variational inequality problem for monotone and Lipschitz continuous mapping, and then finding weakly efficient points for a suitable regularization of the original mapping. We present both absolute and relative versions of our hybrid algorithm in which the subproblems are solved only approximately. The weak convergence of the generated sequence to a weak efficient point is established under quite mild assumptions. In addition, we develop some extensions of our hybrid algorithms for vector optimization by using Bregman-type functions.

Keywords

Vector optimization Proximal points Hybrid inexact algorithms Auxiliary variational inequalities Banach spacies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bonnel, H., Iusem, A.N., Svaiter, B.F.: Proximal methods in vector optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 15(4), 953–970 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fliege, J., Svaiter, B.F.: Steepest descent methods for multicriteria optimization. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 51, 479–494 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grana Drummond, L.M., Svaiter, B.F.: A steepest descent method for vector optimization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175, 395–414 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grana Drummond, L.M., Iusem, A.N.: A projected gradient method for vector optimization problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 28, 5–30 (2004) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eckstein, J.: Approximate iterations in Bregman-function-based proximal algorithms. Math. Program. 83, 113–123 (1998) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J. Control Optim. 14, 877–898 (1976) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burachik, R.S., Iusem, A.N., Svaiter, B.F.: Enlargement of monotone operators with applications to variational inequalities. Set-Valued Anal. 5, 159–180 (1997) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burachik, R.S., Scheimberg, S., Svaiter, B.F.: Robustness of the hybrid extragradient proximal point algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 111, 117–136 (2001) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, B.S.: Inexact implicit methods for monotone general variational inequalities. Math. Program. 86, 199–217 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jahn, J.: Theory of vector maximization: Various concepts of efficient solutions. In: Gal, T., Stewart, T.J., Hanne, T. (eds.): Multicriteria Decision Making. Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, pp. 2-1–2-32. Kluwer, Boston (1999) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: An inexact hybrid extragradient-proximal point algorithm using the enlargement of a maximal monotone operator. Set-Valued Anal. 7, 323–345 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burachik, R.S., Iusem, A.N.: Set-Valued Mappings and Enlargements of Monotone Operators. Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 8. Springer, Berlin (2008) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, G., Teboulle, M.: A proximal-based decomposition method for convex minimization problems. Math. Program. 64, 81–100 (1994) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Da Silva Silva, P.J., Eckstein, J., Humes, C.: Rescaling and stepsize selection in proximal methods using separable generalized distance. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 238–261 (2001) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: A hybrid projection-proximal point algorithm. J. Convex Anal. 6, 59–70 (1999) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: Forcing strong convergence of proximal point iterations in a Hilbert space. Math. Program. 87, 189–202 (2000) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: An inexact hybrid generalized proximal point algorithm and some new results on the theory of Bregman functions. Math. Oper. Res. 25(2), 214–230 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Göpfert, A., Riahi, H., Tammer, C., Zălinescu, C.: Variational Methods in Partially Ordered Spaces. Springer, New York (2003) MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Benker, H., Hamel, A., Tammer, C.: An algorithm for vectorial control approximation problems. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 3–12. Springer, Berlin (1997) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kyono, M., Fukushima, M.: Nonlinear proximal decomposition method for convex programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 106, 357–372 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butnariu, D., Iusem, A.N.: Totally Convex Functions for Fixed Point Computation and Infinite Dimensional Optimization. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ceng, L.C., Yao, J.C.: Approximate proximal methods in vector optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(1), 1–19 (2007) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nadezhkina, N., Takahashi, W.: Strong convergence theorem by a hybrid method for nonexpansive mappings and Lipschitz continuous monotone mappings. SIAM J. Optim. 16, 1230–1241 (2006) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Korpelevich, G.M.: The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matecon 12, 747–756 (1976) MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burachik, R.S., Lopes, J.O., Svaiter, B.F.: An outer approximation method for the variational inequality problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 43, 2071–2088 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ceng, L.C., Cubiotti, P., Yao, J.C.: An implicit iterative scheme for monotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems. Nonlinear Anal. 69(8), 2445–2457 (2008) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, I: Basic Theory, II: Applications. Springer, Berlin (2006) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bao, T.Q., Mordukhovich, B.S.: Relative Pareto minimizers for multiobjective problems: existence and optimality conditions. Math. Program. (2009), published online Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bolintineanu, S.: Approximate efficiency and scalar stationarity in unbounded nonsmooth convex vector optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 106, 265–296 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bolintineanu, S.: Vector variational principles, ε-efficiency and scalar stationarity. J. Convex Anal. 8, 71–85 (2001) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luc, D.T.: Theory of Vector Optimization. Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Syst., vol. 319. Springer, Berlin (1989) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schu, J.: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 43, 153–159 (1991) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 149, 75–88 (1970) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phelps, R.R.: Convex Functions, Monotone Operators and Differentiability. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1364. Springer, Berlin (1988) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsShanghai Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Scientific Computing Key Laboratory of Shanghai UniversitiesShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  4. 4.Department of Applied MathematicsNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations