Hybrid Approximate Proximal Method with Auxiliary Variational Inequality for Vector Optimization
- 219 Downloads
- 20 Citations
Abstract
This paper studies a general vector optimization problem of finding weakly efficient points for mappings from Hilbert spaces to arbitrary Banach spaces, where the latter are partially ordered by some closed, convex, and pointed cones with nonempty interiors. To find solutions of this vector optimization problem, we introduce an auxiliary variational inequality problem for a monotone and Lipschitz continuous mapping. The approximate proximal method in vector optimization is extended to develop a hybrid approximate proximal method for the general vector optimization problem under consideration by combining an extragradient method to find a solution of the variational inequality problem and an approximate proximal point method for finding a root of a maximal monotone operator. In this hybrid approximate proximal method, the subproblems consist of finding approximate solutions to the variational inequality problem for monotone and Lipschitz continuous mapping, and then finding weakly efficient points for a suitable regularization of the original mapping. We present both absolute and relative versions of our hybrid algorithm in which the subproblems are solved only approximately. The weak convergence of the generated sequence to a weak efficient point is established under quite mild assumptions. In addition, we develop some extensions of our hybrid algorithms for vector optimization by using Bregman-type functions.
Keywords
Vector optimization Proximal points Hybrid inexact algorithms Auxiliary variational inequalities Banach spaciesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bonnel, H., Iusem, A.N., Svaiter, B.F.: Proximal methods in vector optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 15(4), 953–970 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Fliege, J., Svaiter, B.F.: Steepest descent methods for multicriteria optimization. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 51, 479–494 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Grana Drummond, L.M., Svaiter, B.F.: A steepest descent method for vector optimization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 175, 395–414 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Grana Drummond, L.M., Iusem, A.N.: A projected gradient method for vector optimization problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 28, 5–30 (2004) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.Eckstein, J.: Approximate iterations in Bregman-function-based proximal algorithms. Math. Program. 83, 113–123 (1998) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.Rockafellar, R.T.: Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J. Control Optim. 14, 877–898 (1976) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Burachik, R.S., Iusem, A.N., Svaiter, B.F.: Enlargement of monotone operators with applications to variational inequalities. Set-Valued Anal. 5, 159–180 (1997) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Burachik, R.S., Scheimberg, S., Svaiter, B.F.: Robustness of the hybrid extragradient proximal point algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 111, 117–136 (2001) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.He, B.S.: Inexact implicit methods for monotone general variational inequalities. Math. Program. 86, 199–217 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Jahn, J.: Theory of vector maximization: Various concepts of efficient solutions. In: Gal, T., Stewart, T.J., Hanne, T. (eds.): Multicriteria Decision Making. Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, pp. 2-1–2-32. Kluwer, Boston (1999) Google Scholar
- 11.Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: An inexact hybrid extragradient-proximal point algorithm using the enlargement of a maximal monotone operator. Set-Valued Anal. 7, 323–345 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Burachik, R.S., Iusem, A.N.: Set-Valued Mappings and Enlargements of Monotone Operators. Optimization and Its Applications, vol. 8. Springer, Berlin (2008) Google Scholar
- 13.Chen, G., Teboulle, M.: A proximal-based decomposition method for convex minimization problems. Math. Program. 64, 81–100 (1994) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Da Silva Silva, P.J., Eckstein, J., Humes, C.: Rescaling and stepsize selection in proximal methods using separable generalized distance. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 238–261 (2001) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 15.Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: A hybrid projection-proximal point algorithm. J. Convex Anal. 6, 59–70 (1999) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: Forcing strong convergence of proximal point iterations in a Hilbert space. Math. Program. 87, 189–202 (2000) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 17.Solodov, M.V., Svaiter, B.F.: An inexact hybrid generalized proximal point algorithm and some new results on the theory of Bregman functions. Math. Oper. Res. 25(2), 214–230 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Göpfert, A., Riahi, H., Tammer, C., Zălinescu, C.: Variational Methods in Partially Ordered Spaces. Springer, New York (2003) MATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Benker, H., Hamel, A., Tammer, C.: An algorithm for vectorial control approximation problems. In: Fandel, G., Gal, T. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 3–12. Springer, Berlin (1997) Google Scholar
- 20.Kyono, M., Fukushima, M.: Nonlinear proximal decomposition method for convex programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 106, 357–372 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Butnariu, D., Iusem, A.N.: Totally Convex Functions for Fixed Point Computation and Infinite Dimensional Optimization. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997) Google Scholar
- 22.Ceng, L.C., Yao, J.C.: Approximate proximal methods in vector optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(1), 1–19 (2007) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nadezhkina, N., Takahashi, W.: Strong convergence theorem by a hybrid method for nonexpansive mappings and Lipschitz continuous monotone mappings. SIAM J. Optim. 16, 1230–1241 (2006) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 24.Korpelevich, G.M.: The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matecon 12, 747–756 (1976) MATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Burachik, R.S., Lopes, J.O., Svaiter, B.F.: An outer approximation method for the variational inequality problem. SIAM J. Control Optim. 43, 2071–2088 (2005) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ceng, L.C., Cubiotti, P., Yao, J.C.: An implicit iterative scheme for monotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems. Nonlinear Anal. 69(8), 2445–2457 (2008) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mordukhovich, B.S.: Variational Analysis and Generalized Differentiation, I: Basic Theory, II: Applications. Springer, Berlin (2006) Google Scholar
- 28.Bao, T.Q., Mordukhovich, B.S.: Relative Pareto minimizers for multiobjective problems: existence and optimality conditions. Math. Program. (2009), published online Google Scholar
- 29.Bolintineanu, S.: Approximate efficiency and scalar stationarity in unbounded nonsmooth convex vector optimization problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 106, 265–296 (2000) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 30.Bolintineanu, S.: Vector variational principles, ε-efficiency and scalar stationarity. J. Convex Anal. 8, 71–85 (2001) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 31.Luc, D.T.: Theory of Vector Optimization. Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Syst., vol. 319. Springer, Berlin (1989) Google Scholar
- 32.Schu, J.: Weak and strong convergence to fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 43, 153–159 (1991) CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rockafellar, R.T.: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 149, 75–88 (1970) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 34.Phelps, R.R.: Convex Functions, Monotone Operators and Differentiability. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1364. Springer, Berlin (1988) Google Scholar