Active Constraint Set Invariancy Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Optimization



Active constraint set invariancy sensitivity analysis is concerned with finding the range of parameter variation so that the perturbed problem has still an optimal solution with the same support set that the given optimal solution of the unperturbed problem has. However, in an optimization problem with inequality constraints, active constraint set invariancy sensitivity analysis aims to find the range of parameter variation, where the active constraints in a given optimal solution remains invariant.

For the sake of simplicity, we consider the primal problem in standard form and consequently its dual may have an optimal solution with some active constraints. In this paper, the following question is answered: “what is the range of the parameter, where for each parameter value in this range, a dual optimal solution exists with exactly the same set of positive slack variables as for the current dual optimal solution?”. The differences of the results between the linear and convex quadratic optimization problems are highlighted too.


Parametric optimization Sensitivity analysis Linear optimization Optimal partitions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Goldman, A.J., Tucker, A.W.: Theory of linear programming. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Linear Inequalities and Related Systems. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 38, pp. 63–97. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1956) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dantzig, G.B. (ed.): Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1963) MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roos, C., Terlaky, T., Vial, J.-P. (eds.): Theory and Algorithms for Linear Optimization: An Interior Point Approach. Wiley, Chichester (1997) MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Illés, T., Peng, J., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: A strongly polynomial rounding procedure yielding a maximally complementary solution for P *(κ) linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 11(2), 320–340 (2000) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarvis, J.J., Sherali, H.D., Bazaraa, M.S. (eds.): Linear Programming and Network Flows. Wiley, New York (1997) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murty, K.G. (ed.): Linear Programming. Wiley, New York (1983) MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jansen, B., de Jong, J.J., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear programming: just be careful!. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 101, 15–28 (1997) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karmarkar, N.K.: A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica 4, 375–395 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adler, I., Monteiro, R.: A geometric view of parametric linear programming. Algorithmica 8, 161–176 (1992) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jansen, B., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: An interior point approach to postoptimal and parametric analysis in linear programming. Report No. 92-21, Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Information/Computer science, Delft University of Technology (1992) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gal, T., Greenberg, H.J. (eds.): Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming. Kluwer Academic, London (1997) MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greenberg, H.J.: Simultaneous primal-dual right-hand-side sensitivity analysis from a primal-dual strictly complementary solution of a linear program. SIAM J. Optim. 10, 427–442 (2000) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Romanko, O., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in convex quadratic optimization: simultaneous perturbation of the objective and right-hand-side vectors. Algorithmic Oper. Res. (2007, to appear) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koltai, T., Terlaky, T.: The difference between managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65, 257–274 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear optimization: invariant support set intervals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1158–1175 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in convex quadratic optimization: invariant support set intervals. Optimization 54(1), 59–69 (2005) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghaffari Hadigheh, A.R., Mirnia, K., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear and convex quadratic optimization: invariant active constraint set and invariant set intervals. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. (INFOR) 44(2), 129–155 (2006) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorn, W.S.: Duality in quadratic programming. Q. Appl. Math. 18, 155–162 (1960) MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berkelaar, A.B., Jansen, B., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: An interior point approach to parametric convex quadratic programming. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands (1997) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nesterov, Y., Nemirovskii, A. (eds.): Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming: Theory and Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia (1994) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceAzarbaijan Tarbiat Moallem UniversityTabrizIran
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Sciences FacultyUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran
  3. 3.Research Institute for Fundamental ScienceTabrizIran
  4. 4.Department of Computing and SoftwareMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations