When Makerspaces Meet School: Negotiating Tensions Between Instruction and Construction
When considering science education within the makerspace (engineering workshop) context, insufficient attention may be paid to the cultural models organising the learning activity in such spaces. Too often, learning is imagined to be orchestrated by instructors, and students are supposed to passively respond to activities and events planned on their behalf; even when constructivist approaches are considered, curriculum goals are seldom negotiated, let alone led by student interests. We report on a case study of school which designed a learning organisation around a makerspace, built upon a hacker model of learning. Here, we used the benign version of hack, meaning to reverse- and creatively engineer devices to suit one’s goals. While it may appear that less ‘teaching’ is required, the tasks required to effectively remove the supports, and yet achieve learning, are non-trivial indeed. We found three practices that defined such a space: (i) a significant ludic component, (ii) highly authentic scientific practices, and (iii) attention to tacit knowledges in learning the practices of science. We argue that the mythologies surrounding the hacker stereotype have made an impartial consideration of hacking difficult, and that one effective way of using makerspaces for science instruction can be based on a reimagined set of goals for science. Specifically, attention needs to be paid towards the performative aspects of scientific knowledge in addition to competence in the representations of science.
KeywordsMakerspaces Hackers Cultural design Learning environments STEM education
I would like to acknowledge the contribution of Deborah Fields who provided assistance in the early conceptualisation of this manuscript. I am also thankful to the anonymous reviewers whose insights have improved the quality of this manuscript. National Institute of Education (Singapore) http://www.nie.edu.sg.
This research has been supported by funding from the Ministry of Education, Singapore. Grant number ERFP OER 12/14 MT. The opinions here are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of the funding source.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Research on human subjects has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Nanyang Technological University. All participants have provided informed consent for participation in this study. No sufficiently identifiable information about participants has been included in this manuscript.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Banks, D. A. (2018, January 24). Engineered for dystopia. Retrieved February 8, 2018, from https://thebaffler.com/latest/engineered-for-dystopia-banksGoogle Scholar
- Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: the democratization of invention. In FabLabs: Of machines, makers, and inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.Google Scholar
- Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Children are not hackers: building a culture of powerful ideas, deep learning, and equity in the maker movement. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: makerspaces as learning environments. (pp. 64–80).Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Burbules, N. (2016). Technology, education, and the fetishization of the ‘New’. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: discourses of change and changes of discourse. Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
- Chan, A. S. (2014). Beyond technological fundamentalism: Peruvian hack labs & “inter-technological” education. Journal of Peer Production, 5. Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peer-reviewed-articles/beyond-technological-fundamentalism-peruvian-hack-labs-and-inter-technological-education
- Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2017). Why democracies need science. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Davis, R. L., Schneider, B., & Blikstein, P. (2017). Making the invisible visible: a new method for capturing student development in makerspaces. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim (Eds.), Making a difference: prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2017 (Vol. 1, pp. 175–182). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
- García Martinez, A. (2016). Chaos monkeys: inside the Silicon Valley money machine. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
- Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: how a group of inventors, hackers, geniuses and geeks created the digital revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Levy, S. (2001). Hackers: heroes of the computer revolution (Vol. 4). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.McComas W.F. (2014) “21st-Century Skills”. In: McComas W.F. (Ed.) The language of science education. SensePublishers: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
- McComas, W. F. (2014). The language of science education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Pubishers.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2017). MOE FY 2017 committee of supply debate speech. [Web page] Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/moe-fy-2017-committee-of-supply-debate-speech-by-minister-of-education-schools-ng-chee-meng
- Mitnick, K. D., & Simon, W. L. (2005). The art of intrusion: the real stories behind the exploits of hackers, intruders & deceivers. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
- O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- OpenGov Asia. (2017). RIE2020 plan – A*STAR to launch two model factories, AI.SG makerspace to be operational in January 2018. OpenGov Asia [Web page]. Retrieved from http://www.opengovasia.com/articles/7830-rie2020-plan-astar-to-launch-two-model-factories-aisg-makerspace-to-be-operational-in-january-2018
- Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Peh, S. H. (2016). Neither civil nor servant: the Philip Yeo story. Singapore: Straits Times Press.Google Scholar
- Pickering, A., & Guzik, K. (Eds.). (2008). The mangle in practice: science, society, and becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Sim, W. H. (2003). Chaotic thoughts from the old millennium. Singapore: Cruxible.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2016). As global study TIMSS turns 20, new results show east Asian students continue to outperform peers in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Press Release. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/T15-Press-Release-FINAL-11-29.pdf
- The Economist Intelligence Unit, & Asian Development Bank. (2014). Creative productivity index: analysing creativity and innovation in Asia. Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
- Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: rescuing social change from the cult of technology. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
- White House. (2014). Presidential proclamation—national day of making. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/06/17/presidential-proclamation-national-day-making-2014
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (Fourth ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Inc.Google Scholar