Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 448–468 | Cite as

Competency Maps: an Effective Model to Integrate Professional Competencies Across a STEM Curriculum

  • Fermín Sánchez Carracedo
  • Antonia Soler
  • Carme Martín
  • David López
  • Alicia Ageno
  • Jose Cabré
  • Jordi Garcia
  • Joan Aranda
  • Karina Gibert
Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

Curricula designed in the context of the European Higher Education Area need to be based on both domain-specific and professional competencies. Whereas universities have had extensive experience in developing students’ domain-specific competencies, fostering professional competencies poses a new challenge we need to face. This paper presents a model to globally develop professional competencies in a STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) degree program, and assesses the results of its implementation after 4 years. The model is based on the use of competency maps, in which each competency is defined in terms of competency units. Each competency unit is described by a set of expected learning outcomes at three domain levels. This model allows careful analysis, revision, and iteration for an effective integration of professional competencies in domain-specific subjects. A global competency map is also designed, including all the professional competency learning outcomes to be achieved throughout the degree. This map becomes a useful tool for curriculum designers and coordinators. The results were obtained from four sources: (1) students’ grades (classes graduated from 2013 to 2016, the first 4 years of the new Bachelor’s Degree in Informatics Engineering at the Barcelona School of Informatics); (2) students’ surveys (answered by students when they finished the degree); (3) the government employment survey, where former students evaluate their satisfaction of the received training in the light of their work experience; and (4) the Everis Foundation University-Enterprise Ranking, answered by over 2000 employers evaluating their satisfaction regarding their employees’ university training, where the Barcelona School of Informatics scores first in the national ranking. The results show that competency maps are a good tool for developing professional competencies in a STEM degree.

Keywords

STEM education Engineering education Professional competencies Professional skills Academic programs Curriculum design Competency maps Competency units Learning outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Erik Cobo, Rafel Farré, Pere Marés, and Luis Velasco for their contribution to this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. ABET. (2017). Accreditation criteria. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/. Last accessed March 2018.
  2. ACM. (2008). Computer science curriculum 2008: an interim revision of CS 2001. Report from the Interim Review Task Force. Association for Computing Machinery. IEEE Computer Society. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/education/curricula-recommendations/computerscience2008.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  3. Akcay, H., & Yager, R. E. (2010). The impact of a science/technology/society teaching approach on student learning in five domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aliakbarian, H., Soh, P. J., Farsi, S., Hantao, X., Van Lil, E. H. E. M. J., Nauwelaers, B. K. J. C., Vandenbosch, G. A. E., & Schreurs, D. M. M.-P. (2014). Implementation of a project-based telecommunications engineering design course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appleton, J., Lawrenz, F., Craft, E., Cudmore, W., Hall, J., & Waintraub, J. (2007). Models for curricular materials development: combining applied development processes with theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(6), 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AQU. (2014). Ocupabilitat i competències dels graduats recents: l’opinió d’empreses i institucions. Retrieved from http://www.aqu.cat/doc/doc_69192241_1.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  7. Arbelaitz, O., Martin, J. I., & Muguerza, J. (2015). Analysis of introducing active learning methodologies in a basic computer architecture course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(2), 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassellier, G., Benbasat, I., & Reich, B. H. (2003). The influence of business managers’ IT competence on championing IT. Information Systems Research, 14(4), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayer Corporation. (2014). The Bayer facts of science education XVI: US STEM workforce shortage—myth or reality? Fortune 1000 talent recruiters on the debate. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beneitona, P, Esquetini, C., González, J., Maletá, M. M., Siufi, G., & Wagenaar, R. (2007). Reflections on and outlook for higher education in Latina America. Final report—Tuning Latina America Project. University of Deusto and University of Groningen, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/images/stories/Publications/Tuning_A_Latina_INGL_PR2.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  11. Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O., & Ayal, N. (2010). Harnessing the environmental professional expertise of engineering students—The course: “Environmental Management Systems in the Industry”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 532–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: handbook I. The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  13. Cajander, A., Daniels, M. & von Konsky, B. R. (2011). Development of professional competencies in engineering education. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Rapid City, SD.Google Scholar
  14. Cano, E. (2012). El impacto de la evaluación educativa en el desarrollo de competencias en la universidad. La perspectiva de las primeras promociones de graduados. Internacionalización de la I+D. Plan Nacional de I+D+I (2012-2015). Dirección General de investigación y gestión del plan nacional de I+D+i. EDU2012-32766.Google Scholar
  15. Clancy, E., Quinn, P., & Miller, J. E. (2001). Using case studies to increase awareness of, and improve resolution strategies for, ethical issues in engineering. 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  16. Crawley, E. F., Brodeur, D. R., & Soderholm, D. H. (2008). The education of future aeronautical engineers: conceiving, designing, implementing and operating. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer International.Google Scholar
  18. European Parliament, European Council. (2008). The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) for livelong learning. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/sites/eac-eqf/files/leaflet_en.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  19. Evans, R., & Gabriel, J. (2007). Performing engineering: how the performance metaphor for engineering can transform communications learning and teaching. 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  20. Gardelliano, S. (2002). UNIDO competencies. Strengthening organizational core values and managerial capabilities. Technical report, United Nations Industrial Development Organization UNIDO.Google Scholar
  21. Hernando, M., Galan, R., Navarro, I., & Rodriguez-Losada, D. (2011). Ten years of Cybertech: the educational benefits of bullfighting robotics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodson, D. (1992). Assessment of practical work. Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science & Education, 1(2), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, S. C. (2003). A wholesome ECE education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(4), 444–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu, Q., Li, F., & Chen, C. (2015). A Smart Home Test Bed for undergraduate education to bridge the curriculum gap from traditional power systems to modernized Smart Grids. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(1), 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leuven University. (2005). Guided independent learning: a brochure for instructors DUO/ICTO (Central Educational Support), University of Leuven. Retrieved from https://blog.associatie.kuleuven.be/petrsu/files/2013/11/brochuregil.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  27. Mahan, J. E., Jayasumana, A., Lile, D., & Palmquist, M. (2000). Bringing an emphasis on technical writing to a freshman course in electrical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(1), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohan, A., Merle, D., Jackson, C., & Lannin, J. (2010). Professional skills in the engineering curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(4), 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newrock, R., & Tovar, E. Eds. (2005). Competencies of engineers in Proc. Plenary Sessions of Int. COnf. Engineering Computer education 2005 (IECEC05).Google Scholar
  30. Norton, R. E. (1997). DACUM handbook, 2nd ed. Leadership Training Series, 67. The Ohio State University, Center on Education and Training for Employment. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED401483.pdf. Last accessed March 2018.
  31. O’Connell, R. M. (2015). Adapting team-based learning for application in the basic electric circuit theory sequence. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(2), 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimmely, R. L. (2003). A practical approach for converting group assignments into team projects. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(2), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn, P. (2005). Assessment of a case study laboratory to increase awareness of ethical issues in engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rayney, V. P. (2002). Beyond technology-renaissance engineers. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(1).Google Scholar
  36. Riemer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89–100.Google Scholar
  37. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET professional skills—can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taraman, K., & Tovar, E. Ed (2005). Enhancing the competencies of manufacturing engineers through society of manufacturing engineers- academia-industry partnerships. In Proc. Plenary Sessions of Int. COnf. Engineering Computer education 2005 (IECEC05).Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, E. (2016). Investigating the perception of stakeholders on soft skills development of students: evidence from South Africa. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Life Long Learning, 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tribus, M. (2005). Some remarks on the improvement of engineering education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Villa, A., & Poblete, M. (2008). Competence-based learning. A proposal for the assessment of generic competences. Bilbao: University of Deusto.Google Scholar
  42. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barcelona School of InformaticsUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC-BarcelonaTech)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations