Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 655–664 | Cite as

The (De-)evolution of Evolution Games: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Evolution Through Natural Selection in Digital Games

  • Alex P. LeithEmail author
  • Rabindra A. Ratan
  • Donghee Yvette Wohn


Given the diversity and complexity of education game mechanisms and topics, this article contributes to a theoretical understanding of how game mechanisms “map” to educational topics through inquiry-based learning. Namely, the article examines the presence of evolution through natural selection (ENS) in digital games. ENS is a fundamentally important and widely misunderstood theory. This analysis of ENS portrayal in digital games provides insight into the use of games in teaching ENS. Systematic database search results were coded for the three principles of ENS: phenotypic variation, differential fitness, and fitness heritability. Though thousands of games use the term evolution, few presented elements of evolution, and even fewer contained all principles of ENS. Games developed to specifically teach evolution were difficult to find through Web searches. These overall deficiencies in ENS games reflect the inherent incompatibility between game control elements and the automatic process of ENS.


Evolution STEM fields Education Natural selection Games 


  1. Adams SH, Ajlouni J, Dennis A, Rossi M (2011) Adventure club games presskit—evolution games. Retrieved February 13, 2016, from
  2. Bean TE, Sinatra GM, Schrader PG (2010) Spore: spawning evolutionary misconceptions? J Sci Educ Technol 19:409–414. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9211-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell P, Lewenstein B, Shouse AW, Feder MA (eds) (2009) Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce BC, Bruce SP, Conrad RL, Huang H-J (1997) University science students as curriculum planners, teachers, and role models in elementary school classrooms. J Res Sci Teach 34:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavazza M, Charles F (2005) Dialogue generation in character-based interactive storytelling. In: Artificial intelligence and interactive digital entertainment, pp 21–26. Retrieved from
  6. Cavazza M, Lugrin J-L, Pizzi D, Charles F (2007) Madame bovary on the holodeck: immersive interactive storytelling. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimedia, pp 651–660. ACMGoogle Scholar
  7. Compete (2012) Compete pro. Retrieved from
  8. Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eshach H, Fried MN (2005) Should science be taught in early childhood? J Sci Educ Technol 14:315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson CJ (2007) The good, the bad and the ugly: a meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatr Quart 78:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfrey-Smith P (2007) Conditions for evolution by natural selection. J Philos 104:489–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heeter C, Starr B (2012). DNA roulette: understanding genetics and genetic testing through gaming. In: Presented at the games for health, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Heeter C, Winn BM, Darcy DG (2005) Theories meet realities: designing a learning game for girls. Presented at the Designing for User eXperience, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. Heeter C, Yaske JD, Fitzgerald J, Brozovic E, Scolieri J, Starr DB (2012) About DNA roulette. Retrieved February 13, 2016, from
  16. Kennedy-Clark S, Thompson K (2011) What do students learn when collaboratively using a computer game in the study of historical disease epidemics, and why? Games Cult 6:513–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klimmt C, Roth C, Vermeulen I, Vorderer P, Roth FS (2012) Forecasting the experience of future entertainment technology: “interactive storytelling” and media enjoyment. Games Cult 7:187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–18Google Scholar
  19. Lieberman DA (2012) Designing digital games, social media, and mobile technologies to motivate and support health behavior change. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK (eds) Public communication campaigns, 4th edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, pp 273–287Google Scholar
  20. Poli D, Berenotto C, Blankenship S, Piatkowski B, Bader GA, Poore M (2012) Bringing evolution to a technological generation: a case study with the video game SPORE. Am Biol Teach 74:100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reimann P, Thompson K (2009) Ecosystem modelling for environmental education: from stocks and flows to behavior and interactions. In: Blumschein P, Stroebel J, Hung W, Jonassen D (eds) Model-based approaches to learning: using systems models and simulations to improve understanding and problem solving in complex domains. Sense, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Rezba RJ, Auldridge T, Rhea L (1999) Teaching and learning the basic science skills. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Middle School Instructional ServicesGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritterfeld U, Cody M, Vorderer P (eds) (2009) Immersive serious games for large scale multiplayer dialogue and cocreation. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Roth WM (1996) Art and artifact of children’s designing: a situated cognition perspective. J Learn Sci 5:129–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwab JJ (1960) Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. Sch Rev 68:176–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sobkowiak W, Barbosa W (2012) Five years in second life, or: phonetically augmented virtuality in second life english as a foreign language. Scribd. Retrieved from
  27. Squire K (2008) Open-ended video games: a model for developing learning for the interactive age. In: Salen K (ed) The ecology of games: connecting youth, games, and learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 167–198Google Scholar
  28. Williams D (2010) The mapping principle, and a research framework for virtual worlds. Commun Theory 20:451–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex P. Leith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rabindra A. Ratan
    • 1
  • Donghee Yvette Wohn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Media and InformationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations