Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

The Effect of Planetariums on Teaching Specific Astronomy Concepts

Article

Abstract

This study aimed to determine students’ knowledge levels related to specific astronomy concepts and the effect of a planetarium environment on teaching. The study sample included seventh-grade (12–13 years old) students. For this purpose, 240 students of various socioeconomic and cultural levels from six schools (two in the city center, two in the districts and two in the villages) were enrolled in the study. The pretest–posttest control group quasi-experimental design was used in the study. The experimental and control groups were generated by random assignment. The “Solar System and Beyond” unit was selected. In the experimental group, the unit was taught with the use of a planetarium environment, whereas the same unit was taught to the control group students in a classroom environment. A test consisting of 14 multiple-choice questions was used as the pretest and posttest at the beginning and end of the unit. The data obtained were evaluated using the SPSS 20.0 software package program. The study results showed that teaching astronomical concepts in a planetarium environment was more effective than in a classroom environment. The study also revealed that students in the planetarium-assisted group were more successful in comprehending subjects that require 3D thinking, a reference system, changing the time and observation of periodic motion than those in control group.

Keywords

Science education Astronomy education Planetarium Astronomy concepts 

References

  1. Baxter JH (1989) Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. Int J Sci Educ 11:502. doi:10.1080/0950069890110503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisard WJ, Aron RH, Francek MA, Nelson BD (1994) Assessing selected physical science and earth science misconceptions of middle school through university preservice teachers: breaking the science “Misconception Cycle”. J Coll Sci Teach 24:38Google Scholar
  3. Bishop JE (1980) The development and testing of a participatory planetarium unit emphasizing projective astronomy concepts and utilizing the Karplus learning cycle. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of AkronGoogle Scholar
  4. Borghi L, De Ambrosis A, Massara C (1991) Physics education in science training of primary school teachers. Eur J Teach Educ 14:57–63. doi:10.1080/0261976910140107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Croft J (2008) Beneath the dome: GoodWork in planetariums. GoodWork Project Report Series (Report No. 58), Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Employment, Education and Training (1989) Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH (2012) How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraknoi A (1996) Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination. In: Percy JR (ed), ASP Conference Series 89, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Hannu S (1993) Science centre education: motivation and learning in informal education. (PhD Thesis), Helsinki University Department of Teacher Education, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayward RR (1975) The developing and field testing of an instrument using the planetarium to evaluate the attainment of the concept of annual motion. Diss Abstr Int B: Sci Eng 36:4382Google Scholar
  11. Henriques L (2000) Children’s misconceptions about weather: a review of the literature, the annual meeting of the national association of research in science teaching. The annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  12. Hufnagel B (2002) Development of the astronomy diagnostic test. Astron Educ Rev 1(1):47. doi:10.3847/AER2001004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalkan H, Kıroğlu K (2007) Science and nonscience students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts in preservice training for education teachers. Astron Educ Rev 1(6):15–24. doi:10.3847/AER2007002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keuthe JL (1963) Science concepts: a study of “sophisticated” errors. Sci Educ 47(4):361–364. doi:10.1002/sce.3730470410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kikas E (1998) The impact of teaching on students’ definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena. Learn Instr 8(5):439–454. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00004-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein C (1982) Children’s conceptions of the earth and the sun: a cross cultural study. Sci Educ 65(1):95–107. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lightman A, Sadler P (1993) Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. Phys Teach 31:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mallon GL, Bruce MH (1982) Student achievement and attitudes in astronomy: an experimental comparison of two planetarium programs. J Res Sci Teach 19:53–61. doi:10.1002/tea.3660190108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mant J, Summers M (1993) Some primary-school teachers’ understanding of the earth’s place in the universe. Res Paper Educ 8(1):101. doi:10.1080/0267152930080107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Norton O (1996) Will planetariums become extinct? Sky Telescope 70:534Google Scholar
  22. Ojala J (1992) The third planet. Int J Sci Educ 14:191. doi:10.1080/0950069920140207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ojala J (1997) Lost in space? The concepts of planetary phenomena held by Trainee Primary School Teachers. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 6(3):183. doi:10.1080/10382046.1997.9965047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orpwood G, Souque J (1985) Towards the renewal of Canadian science education. II. Findings and recommendations. Sci Educ 69:625–636. doi:10.1002/sce.3730690505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer JC (2007) The efficacy of planetarium experiences to teach specific science concepts. Diss Abstr Int B: Sci Eng 68:939Google Scholar
  26. Petersen C (1989) There’s no place like dome. Sky Telescope 9:255Google Scholar
  27. Pitluga L (1971) An experimental comparison of planetarium teaching programs. (M.S. Thesis), State University of New York, OswegoGoogle Scholar
  28. Reed G (1970) Is the planetarium a more effective teaching device than the combination of the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe? Sch Sci Math 70:487–492. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1970.tb08676.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reed G, Campbell JR (1972) A comparison of the effectiveness of the planetarium and the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe in the teaching of specific astronomical concepts. Sch Sci Math 72:368–374. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1972.tb08887.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rollins MM, Denton JJ, Janke DL (1983) Attainment of selected earth science concepts by Texas high school seniors. J Educ Res 7:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sadler PM (1992) The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Schnepps MH, Sadler PM (1989) A private universe-preconceptions that block learning. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Secretary of State for Education and Science (1983) Report of the U.S. department of education’s national commission on excellence in education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 8 Jan 2014 http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/sc3risk.htm
  34. Sharp JG (1996) Children’s astronomical belief’s: a preliminary study of year 6 children in South-West England. Int Sci Educ 18(6):685. doi:10.1080/0950069960180601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Small JK, Plumier DJ (2010) Survey of the goals and beliefs of planetarium professionals regarding program design. Astron Educ Rev 9:1–10. doi:10.3847/AER2010016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith TV (1974) The planetarium in education: a review of the literature. Nova University, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED111658Google Scholar
  37. Sunal D (1976) Analysis of research on the educational uses of a planetarium. J Res Sci Teach 13:345–349. doi:10.1002/tea.3660130409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sunal D, Sunal C (1977) The planetarium in the American school experience. Sch Sci Math 203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1977.tb09339.x
  39. Tomorrow 98 (1992) Report from the commission on science and technological education. Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of EducationGoogle Scholar
  40. Trumper R (2000) University students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Phys Educ 35(1):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trumper R (2001a) A cross-age study of junior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Int J Sci Educ 23(11):1111–1123. doi:10.1080/09500690010025085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trumper R (2001b) A cross-age study of senior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Res Sci Technol Educ 19(1):97–109. doi:10.1080/02635140120046259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trumper R (2001c) A cross-college age study of science and nonscience students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts in preservice training for high-school teachers. J Sci Educ Technol 10(2):189–195. doi:10.1023/A:1009477316035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trumper R (2003) The need for change in elementary school teacher training: a cross-college age study of future teachers’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Teach Teach Educ 19:309–323. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00017-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trumper R (2006) Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts: seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. J Res Sci Teach 43(9):879–906. doi:10.1002/tea.20138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trundle CK, Atwood KR, Christopher EJ (2002) Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. J Res Sci Teach 39(7):633. doi:10.1002/tea.10039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Twiest MG (1989) The attitudinal and cognitive effects of planetarium integration in teaching selected astronomical concepts to fourth, fifth, and sixth-grade students. Diss Abstr Int B: Sci Eng 51:473Google Scholar
  48. Vosniadou S (1991) Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. J Curr Stud 23:219–237. doi:10.1080/0022027910230302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yee AH, Baer JM, Holt KD (1971) An evaluation of the effectiveness of school planetarium experiences. Educational Technology Research (Report No. 41), Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu KC (2005) Digital full-domes: the future of virtual astronomy education. Planet J Int Planet Soc 34(3):6–11Google Scholar
  51. Zeilik M, Schau C, Mattern N (1998) Misconceptions and their change in university-level astronomy courses. Phys Teach 36(2):104–107. doi:10.1119/1.880056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeilik M, Schau C, Mattern N (1999) Conceptual astronomy II: replicating conceptual gains, probing attitude changes across three semesters. Am J Phys 67(10):923–927. doi:10.1119/1.19151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science Education Program, Faculty of EducationOndokuz Mayıs UniversitySamsunTurkey

Personalised recommendations