Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 381–397

Supporting Scientific Experimentation and Reasoning in Young Elementary School Students

Article

Abstract

Researchers from multiple perspectives have shown that young students can engage in the scientific reasoning involved in science experimentation. However, there is little research on how well these young students learn in inquiry-based learning environments that focus on using scientific experimentation strategies to learn new scientific information. This work investigates young children’s science concept learning via inquiry-based instruction on the thermodynamics system in a developmentally appropriate, technology-supported learning environment. First- and third-grade students participate in three sets of guided experimentation activities that involve using handheld computers to measure change in temperature given different types of insulation materials. Findings from pre- and post-comparisons show that students at both grade levels are able to learn about the thermodynamics system through engaging in the guided experiment activities. The instruction groups outperformed the control groups on multiple measures of thermodynamics knowledge, and the older children outperform the younger children. Knowledge gains are discussed in the context of mental models of the thermodynamics system that include the individual concepts mentioned above and the relationships between them. This work suggests that young students can benefit from science instruction centered on experimentation activities. It shows the benefits of presenting complex scientific information authentic contexts and the importance of providing the necessary scaffolding for meaningful scientific inquiry and experimentation.

Keywords

Guided experimentation Elementary school students Handheld computers 

References

  1. Amsel E, Brock S (1996) The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cogn Dev 11:523–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass KM, Baxter GP, Glaser R (2001) Using reflective writing exercises to promote writing-to-learn in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Z, Klahr D (1999) All other things being equal: children’s acquisition of the control of variables strategy. Child Dev 70(5):1098–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark D (2001) New representations of knowledge integration: theories or repertoires of ideas?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark DB (2006) Longitudinal conceptual change in students’ understanding of thermal equilibrium: an examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cogn Instr 24(4):467–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Disessa A (1988) Knowledge in pieces. In: Forman G, Purfall PB (eds) Constructivism in the computer age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 49–70Google Scholar
  7. Duschl RA, Schweingruber HA, Shouse AW (2007) Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8/committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentner D, Stevens AL (1983) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NGGoogle Scholar
  9. Inhelder B, Piaget J (1958) The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Basic, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kesidou S, Duit R (1993) Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—an interpretive study. J Res Sci Teach 30(1):85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kesidou S, Duit R, Glynn SM (1995) Conceptual development in physics: students’ understanding of heat. In: Glynn SM, Duit R (eds) Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 179–198Google Scholar
  13. Kind PM (2013) Establishing assessment scales using a novel disciplinary rationale for scientific reasoning. J Res Sci Teach 50(5):530–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klahr D, Nigam M (2004) The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychol Sci 15:661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klahr D, Zimmerman C, Jirout J (2011) Educational interventions to advance children’s scientific thinking. Science 333:971–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn D (1997) Constraints or guideposts? Developmental psychology and science education. Rev Educ Res Spring 67(1):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn D, Phelps E (1982) The development of problem-solving strategies. In: Reese H (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 17. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn D, Amsel E, O’Loughlin M (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewis EL, Linn MC (1994) Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: implications for curricular improvements. J Res Sci Teach 31(6):657–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Linn MC (2006) The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In: Sawyer K (ed) The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 243–264Google Scholar
  21. Linn MC, Hsi S (2000) Computers, teachers, peers: science learning partners. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahweh, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Linn MC, Songer NB (1991) Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: what are appropriate cognitive demands? J Res Sci Teach 28(10):885–918Google Scholar
  23. Linn MC, Songer NB (1993) How do students make sense of science? Merrill-Palmer Q 38(1):47–73Google Scholar
  24. National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintana C, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Krajcik J, Fretz E, Duncan R, Kyza E, Edelson D, Soloway E (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J Learn Sci 13(3):337–386Google Scholar
  27. Schauble L (1990) Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. J Exp Child Psychol 49:31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siegler RS (1991) Children’s Thinking  Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Siegler RS, Liebert RM (1975) Acquisition of formal scientific reasoning by 10- and 13-year-olds: designing a factorial experiment. Dev Psychol 11:401–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Slone M, Tredoux C, Bokhorst F (1989) The developmental progression of children’s knowledge constructions for heating and cooling. J Genetic Psychol 15(2):255–266Google Scholar
  31. Sodian B, Zaitchik D, Carey S (1991) Young children’s differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Dev 62:753–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Triona LM, Klahr D (2003) Point and click or grab and heft: comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cogn Instr 21:149–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tschirgi JE (1980) Sensible reasoning: a hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Dev 51:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Varma K, Ross P, Lawrenz F, Roehrig G, Huffman D, McGuire L, Chen Y, Su S, Jang Y  (2013)  Unpacking the elements of scientific reasoning.  Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,  Rio Grande, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  35. Vosniadou S, Brewer WF (1992) Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cogn Psychol 24:535–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White B, Frederiksen J (1990) Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artif Intell 24:99–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Windschitl M, Thompson J, Braaten M (2008) Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Educ 92(5):941–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiser M, Carey S (1983) When heat and temperature were one. In: Gentner D, Stevens A (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 267–297Google Scholar
  39. Zimmerman C (2000) The development of scientific reasoning skills. Dev Rev 20:99–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zimmerman C (2007) The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Dev Rev 27:172–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations