Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 661–668 | Cite as

Exploring ICT Integration as a Tool to Engage Young People at a Flexible Learning Centre

Article

Abstract

The Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA) Flexible Learning Centres aim to provide a supportive learning environment for young people who find themselves outside of the mainstream secondary schooling system. Drawing on twenty first Century learning principles, the Centres aim to deliver a personalised learning experience with an emphasis on flexibility and individual choice. Provision of a comprehensive curriculum enables young people to make positive future life choices and successfully transition into employment and further training. The aim of this research project has been to work with teaching staff at a Flexible Learning Centre in North Queensland, Australia, to explore the value of integrating ICT in the form of Web 2.0 technologies to enhance young people’s engagement with the subject of science. The findings of this case study suggest that ICT integration is effective in revitalising science education interest for disengaged young people. This may have wider implications in relation to general concerns of declining student interest and participation in science in the secondary years of schooling.

Keywords

Science education Flexible learning ICT integration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The ‘Re-Engaging Disadvantaged Youth Through Science’ Project has been supported by the Australian Research Council, who provided funding for the 3 year project. This project has the active support of Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA).

References

  1. Anderson P (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, February. Retrieved August 17, 2011, from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2011) Children of the Digital Revolution. ABS Australian Social Trends Catalogue No 4102.0. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/LookupAttach/4102.0Publication29.06.117/$File/41020_Childrendigital_Jun2011.pdf
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2010) Australian Curriculum Information Sheet Science. Sydney: ACARAGoogle Scholar
  4. Cisco (2007) Equipping every learner for the twenty first Century: a white paper. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2008/ekits/Equipping_Every_Learner_for_21st_Century_White_Paper.pdf
  5. Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA) (2010) Youth + Foundation Document.EREA, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  6. Fensham P (2004) September Engagement with Science: an international issue that goes beyond knowledge Paper presented at the Science and Mathematics Education Conference (SMEC). Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson L, Smith R, Willis H, Levine A, Haywood K (2011) The 2011 horizon report. austin, Texas: the new media consortium. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/HR2011.pdf
  8. Keamy K, Nicholas H, Mahar S, Herrick C (2007) Personalising education: from research to policy and practice. McLaren Press, Richmond NorthGoogle Scholar
  9. Kimber K, Wyatt-Smith C (2010) Secondary students’ online use and creation of knowledge: refocusing priorities for quality assessment and learning. Australasian J Educ Technol 25(5):607–625Google Scholar
  10. Leadbeater C (2008) What’s Next? 21 Ideas for twenty first Century Learning. Retrieved July 31, 2010, from: http://www.innovationunit.org/sites/default/files/What’s%20Next%20-%2021%20ideas%20for%2021st%20century%20learning.pdf
  11. Mason J (2002) Qualitative researching. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. McLoughlin C, Lee M (2008) The three P’s of pedagogy for the networked society: personalization, participation, and productivity. Int J Tech Learn High Educ 20(1):10–27Google Scholar
  13. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) (2005) learning in an online world (contemporary learning). Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Contemp_Learning_Final.pdf
  14. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) (2008) learning in an online world (learning spaces framework). Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/ICT_LearningOnlineWorld-LearningSpacesFWork.pdf
  15. Schreiner C, Sjoberg S (2004) Sowing the Seeds of ROSE. Unipub AS, OsloGoogle Scholar
  16. Shearer D, Vogt G (2011) Rockets: educator’s guide with activities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Retrieved August 18, 2011, from: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/280754main_Rockets.Guide.pdf
  17. Simons H (2009) Case study research in practice. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  18. Tytler R (2007) Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. ACER Press, CamberwellGoogle Scholar
  19. Walsh L, Lemon B, Black R, Mangan C, Collin P (2011) The role of technology in engaging disengaged youth: final report. Australian Flexible Learning Framework. Canberra. Retrieved August 10, 2011, from: http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/files/Final%20Report_%20Diseng%20Youth_vFINAL.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberley Luanne Wilson
    • 1
  • Suzi Ursula Boldeman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Education/School of Indigenous Australian StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Townsville Flexible Learning CentreEdmund Rice Education Australia Flexible Learning Centre NetworkTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations