A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education


Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance education disconnects teachers and students from the real world, which can generate specific problems in laboratory classes. Current proposals of virtual labs (VL) and remote labs (RL) do not either cover new needs properly or contribute remarkable improvement to traditional labs—except that they favor distance training. Therefore, online teaching and learning in lab practices demand a further step beyond current VL and RL. This paper poses a new reality and new teaching/learning concepts in the field of lab practices in engineering. The developed augmented reality-based lab system (augmented remote lab, ARL) enables teachers and students to work remotely (Internet/intranet) in current CL, including virtual elements which interact with real ones. An educational experience was conducted to assess the developed ARL with the participation of a group of 10 teachers and another group of 20 students. Both groups have completed lab practices of the contents in the subjects Digital Systems and Robotics and Industrial Automation, which belong to the second year of the new degree in Electronic Engineering (adapted to the European Space for Higher Education). The labs were carried out by means of three different possibilities: CL, VL and ARL. After completion, both groups were asked to fill in some questionnaires aimed at measuring the improvement contributed by ARL relative to CL and VL. Except in some specific questions, the opinion of teachers and students was rather similar and positive regarding the use and possibilities of ARL. Although the results are still preliminary and need further study, seems to conclude that ARL remarkably improves the possibilities of current VL and RL. Furthermore, ARL can be concluded to allow further possibilities when used online than traditional laboratory lessons completed in CL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13


  1. Andújar JM, Mateo TJ (2010) Design of virtual and/or remote laboratories. A practical case. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial (RIAI) 7(1):64–72

  2. ARiSE Project, Augmented Reality in School Environments (2009) Accessed 12 June 2011

  3. ARITI Augmented reality interface for teleoperation via Internet (2010) Accessed 15 Jan 2010

  4. ARToolkitPlus library (2011) Accessed 20 June 2011

  5. Azuma R (1997) A survey of augmented reality. PRESENCE: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 6(4):355–385

  6. Bologna process (2011) Accessed 10 Jan 2011

  7. Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. The MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  8. Coin3D (2011) 3D Graphics Developer Kit. Accessed 4 Feb 2011

  9. Dormido S (2002) Control learning: present and future (Plenary Lecture). IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress

  10. Dormido S, Vargas H, Sánchez J, Dormido R, Duro N, Dormido-Canto S, Morilla F (2008) Developing and implementing virtual and remote labs for control education: The UNED pilot experience. Proceedings of the 17th world congress. The international federation of automatic control, pp 8159–8164

  11. Esteban P, Restrepo J, Trefftz H, Jaramillo JE, Álvarez N (2008) Augmented reality: a space for the understanding of concepts of calculus in several variables. Accessed 12 June 2010

  12. European Commission website (Education and Training) (2009). Accessed 10 Feb 2011

  13. Henderson SJ, Feiner S (2009) Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret. ISMAR-AMH. IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—arts, media and humanities, pp 135–144

  14. Huang Y, Liu Y, Wang Y (2009) AR-View: an augmented reality device for digital reconstruction of Yuangmingyuan. ISMAR-AMH. IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality-arts, media and humanities, pp 3–7

  15. ISE Design Suite Software Manuals and Help (UG681) (2010) Xilinx Online documentation. Accessed 16 Dec 2010

  16. Jang JR, Sun C, Mizutani E (1997) ANFIS: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. In: Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, pp 335–368

  17. Jara CA, Candelas A, Torres F (2008) An advanced interactive interface for Robotics e-learning. Int J Online Eng 4(4):17–25

  18. Kaufmann H, Schmalstieg D (2003) Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Comput Graph 27(3):339–345

  19. K-team Corporation (2011) Khepera II user manual. Accessed 3 May 2011

  20. Liarokapis F, Mourkoussis N, White M, Darcy J, Sifniotis M, Petridis P, Basu A, Lister PF (2004) Web3D and augmented reality to support engineering education. World Trans Eng Technol Educ UICEE 3(1):11–14

  21. Loscos C, Widenfeld H, Roussou M, Meyer A, Tecchia F, Drettakis G, Gallo E. Reche-Martinez A, Tsingos N, Chrysanthou Y, Robert L, Bergamasco M, Dettori A, Soubra S (2003) The CREATE Project: mixed reality for design, education, and cultural heritage with a constructivist approach, the second ieee and acm international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, ISMAR

  22. Marín R, Sanz PJ, Del Pobil AP (2005) The UJI online robot: an educational and training experience. Auton Robots 15(3):283–297

  23. Milgram P, Takemura H, Utsumi A, Kishino F (1994) Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuaity continuum. Telemanipulators Telepresence Technologies SPIE 2351:282–292

  24. Nilsson T. 2001. KiKS is a Khepera Simulator. Last accessed Sep 2010

  25. Open Inventor (2011) (last accessed Apr 2011)

  26. OpenGL (2011) The Industry’s Foundation for High Performance Graphics. Last accessed Jan 2011

  27. Piguet Y, Legon S, Matlab K (2010) Matlab commands for Khepera. K-Team Corporation. Accessed 14 Dec 2010

  28. Salzman Ch, Gillet D, Huguenin P (2000) Remote experimentation: improving user perception using augmented reality. NIWeek 2000:17–20

  29. Schwald B, De Laval B (2003) An augmented reality system for training and assistance to maintenance in the industrial context. J WSGG, Int Conf Comput Graph, Vis Comput Vision 11(1)

  30. White M, Mourkoussis N, Darcy J, Petridis P, Liarokapis F, Lister P, Walczak K, Wojciechowski R, Cellary W, Chmielewski J, Stawniak M, Wiza W, Patel M, Stevenson J, Manley J, Giorgini F, Sayd P, Gaspard F (2004) ARCO—an architecture for digitization, management and presentation of virtual exhibitions. Computer graphics international conference (CGI’04), pp 622–625

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A. Mejías Borrero.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 42687 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 42687 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mejías Borrero, A., Andújar Márquez, J.M. A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education. J Sci Educ Technol 21, 540–557 (2012).

Download citation


  • Robotics
  • Digital design
  • Augmented reality
  • Virtual worlds
  • Virtual scenarios
  • Online education
  • Augmented reality lab