Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 771–784

The Role of Student-Advisor Interactions in Apprenticing Undergraduate Researchers into a Scientific Community of Practice



Among science educators, current interest in undergraduate research (UR) is influenced both by the traditional role of the research apprenticeship in scientists’ preparation and by concerns about replacing the current scientific workforce. Recent research has begun to demonstrate the range of personal, professional, and intellectual benefits for STEM students from participating in UR, yet the processes by which student-advisor interactions contribute to these benefits are little understood. We employ situated learning theory (Lave and Wenger, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge in 1991) to examine the role of student-advisor interactions in apprenticing undergraduate researchers, particularly in terms of acculturating students to the norms, values, and professional practice of science. This qualitative study examines interviews with a diverse sample of 73 undergraduate research students from two research-extensive institutions. From these interviews, we articulate a continuum of practices that research mentors employed in three domains to support undergraduate scientists-in-training: professional socialization, intellectual support, and personal/emotional support. The needs of novice students differed from those of experienced students in each of these areas. Novice students needed clear expectations, guidelines, and orientation to their specific research project, while experienced students needed broader socialization in adopting the traits, habits, and temperament of scientific researchers. Underrepresented minority students, and to a lesser extent, women, gained confidence from their interactions with their research mentors and broadened their future career and educational possibilities. Undergraduate research at research-extensive universities exemplifies a cycle of scientific learning and practice where undergraduate researchers are mentored by graduate students and postdoctoral researchers, who are themselves apprentices to faculty members. As such, research mentors of undergraduate students should be aware of the dual scientific and educational aspects of their advising role and its significance in shaping students’ identities and career trajectories.


Undergraduate research Mentoring Undergraduate science education Identity 


  1. Anderson EM, Shannon AL (1988) Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. J Teach Educ 39(1):38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin AE (2002) Preparing the next generation of faculty: graduate school as socialization for the academic career. J High Educ 73(1):94–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow EL, Villarejo M (2004) Making a difference for minorities: evaluation of an educational enrichment program. J Res Sci Teach 41(9):861–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer KW, Bennett JS (2003) Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J High Educ 74(2):210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bettencourt BA, Bol L, Fraser SC (1994) Psychology graduate students as research mentors of undergraduates: a national survey. Psychol Rep 75(2):963–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom BS (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: handbook of cognitive domain. McKay, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (2002) Reinventing undergraduate education: three years after the Boyer report. S.S. Kenny (chair). State University of New York-Stony BrookGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyle P, Boice B (1998) Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innov High Educ 22:157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter FD, Mandell M, Maton KI (2009) The influence of on-campus, academic year research on STEM Ph.D outcomes: evidence from the Meyerhoff Scholars program. Educ Eval Pol Anal 31(4):441–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (COSEPUP) (1997) Adviser, teacher, role model, friend: on being a mentor to students in science and engineering. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (COSEPUP) (2009) On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research, 3rd edn. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. DeWelde K, Laursen SL (2008) The “Ideal Type” advisor: how advisors help STEM graduate students find their ‘scientific feet’. Open Educ J 1:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan E, Johnson D (2009) Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: an exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. J Sci Educ Technol 18:487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman A, Divoll K, Rogan-Klyve A (2009) Research education of new scientists: implications for science teacher education. J Res Sci Teach 46(4):442–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontana A, Frey JH (2000) The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 645–672Google Scholar
  16. Golde CM (1998) Beginning graduate school: explaining first-year doctoral attrition. New Dir High Educ 101:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golde CM, Dore TM (2001) At cross purposes: what the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Pew Charitable Trusts, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Guberman J, Saks J, Shapiro B, Torchia M (2006) Making the right moves: a practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty. Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC & Chevy Chase, MDGoogle Scholar
  19. Handelsman J, Pfund C, Lauffer SM, Pribbenow CM (2005) Entering mentoring: a seminar to train a new generation of scientists. University of Wisconsin at Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hathaway R, Nagda B, Gregerman S (2002) The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional educational pursuit: an empirical study. J Coll Stud Dev 43(5):614–631Google Scholar
  21. Hunter AB, Laursen SL, Seymour E (2007) Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ 91(1):36–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson WB (2003) A framework for conceptualizing competence to mentor. Ethics Behav 13(2):127–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahveci A, Southerland SA, Gilmer PJ (2008) From marginality to legitimate peripherality: understanding the essential functions of a women’s program. Sci Educ 92(1):33–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kardash CM (2000) Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. J Educ Psychol 92(1):191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kram KE (1985) Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Scott, Foresman and Company, GlenviewGoogle Scholar
  26. Laursen SL, Hunter AB, Seymour E, Thiry H, Melton G (2010) Undergraduate research in the sciences: engaging students in real science. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  27. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Merkel CA (2003) Undergraduate research at the research universities. New Direct Teach Learn 93:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagda BA, Gregerman SR, Jonides J, von Hippel W, Lerner JS (1998) Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Rev High Educ 22(1):55–72Google Scholar
  30. Pfund C, Pribbenow CM, Branchaw J, Lauffer SM, Handelsman J (2006) The merits of training mentors. Science 311:473–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Research Corporation (2001) Academic excellence: the sourcebook. A study of the role of research in the natural sciences at undergraduate institutions. The Research Corporation, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  32. Russell SH (2005) Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: survey of STEM graduates (contributors—Ailes C, Hancock M, McCullough J, Roessner JD, Storey C). SRI International, Menlo Park. Retrieved 7/17/07 from
  33. Seymour E, Hunter AB, Laursen SL, DeAntoni T (2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: first findings from a three-year study. Sci Educ 88(4):493–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spradley JP (1980) Participant observation. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  35. Thiry H, Hunter AB (2008) Student outcomes from the LA-STEM Research Scholars program: an evaluation of the LA-STEM Research Scholars program at Louisiana State University, 2007–2008. Ethnography & Evaluation Research, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  36. Thiry H, Laursen SL (2009) Student outcomes from undergraduate research: an evaluation of three academic year and summer undergraduate research programs in the life sciences at the University of Colorado, Boulder, 2007–2008. Ethnography & Evaluation Research, Boulder.
  37. Thiry H, Laursen SL, Hunter A-B (2010) What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. J High EducGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Maanen J, Schein EH (1979) Towards a theory of organizational socialization. In: Staw BM (ed) Research in organizational behavior, vol 1. JAI, Greenwich, pp 209–264Google Scholar
  39. Villarejo M, Barlow AE, Kogan D, Veazey BD, Sweeney JK (2008) Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: career paths survey results. CBE Life Sci Educ 7(4):394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Whiteside U, Pantelone DW, Hunter-Reel K, Eland J, Kleiber B, Larimer M (2007) Initial suggestions for supervising and mentoring undergraduate research assistants at large research universities. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 19(3):325–330Google Scholar
  43. Zeldin A, Pajares F (2000) Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. Am Educ Res J 37(1):215–246Google Scholar
  44. Zydney AL, Bennett JS, Shahid A, Bauer KW (2002) Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. J Eng Educ 91(2):151–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ethnography & Evaluation Research, 580 UCBUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations