Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 458–465 | Cite as

Using Project-Based Data in Physics to Examine Television Viewing in Relation to Student Performance in Science



Mass media, particularly television, influence public conceptions and attitudes toward learning science. The discovery of an original method that does not rely on self-reported viewing habits to measure the impact of television on students’ performance in science arose from a study of a unit on electricity in a Physics course. In determining the number of television sets at home and the number of hours of operation, data emerged that allowed an investigation of associations between each of these variables and student performance in physics. A negative impact on performance was found in its consistent decrease as both the number of sets and the time the sets are on increase. These results provide dramatic independent confirmation of the negative impact of television viewing on achievement determined through meta-analysis of many studies, and are also consistent with those in the literature at large, particularly from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Furthermore, the totally ‘blind’ participation of the subjects lends a degree of authenticity rarely found in a classically designed study. The findings impact scientific literacy, since performance in science and conceptions of science and scientists, are all inextricably linked.


Television viewing Physics performance Science learning 


  1. Anderson DR, Huston AC, Scmitt KL, Linebarger DL, Wright JC (2001) Early childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior: the recontact study. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 66(1):1–147. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angle BD (1981) The relationship between children’s televiewing and the variables of reading attitude, reading achievement, book reading, and IQ in a sample of fifth grade children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron)Google Scholar
  3. Bachen CM, Hornby MC, Roberts DF, Hernandez-Ramos PF (1982) Television viewing behavior and the development of reading skills: survey evidence (Report No. CS-006573). Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED214150), New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaton AE, Martin MO, Mullis IVS, Gonzalez EJ, Smith TA, Kelly DL (1996) Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Science achievement in the middle years. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational AchievementGoogle Scholar
  5. Beentjes JWJ, Van der Voort THA (1988) Television’s impact on children’s reading skills: a review of research. Read Res Q 23:389–413. doi:10.2307/747640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianculli D (1992) Teleliteracy: taking television seriously. Continuum, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldas SJ, Bankston C (1999) Black and white TV: television viewing, and academic achievement. Sociol Spectr 19:39–61. doi:10.1080/027321799280299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Center for the Digital Future (2008) Accessed 25 Nov 2008
  9. Child Trends DataBank (2008) Accessed 25 Nov 2008
  10. Childers PR, Ross J (1973) The relationship between television and student achievement. J Educ Res 66:317–319Google Scholar
  11. Clark WJ (1951) Of children and television. Xavier University, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke AT, Kurtz-Costes B (1997) Television viewing, educational quality of the home environment, and school readiness. J Educ Res 90:279–285Google Scholar
  13. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  14. Comstock G, Paik H (1991) Television and the American child. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi M, Kubey R (1981) Television and the rest of life: a systematic comparison of subjective experience. Public Opin Q 45:317–328. doi:10.1086/268667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eastman W (2001) Media culture and media violence: making the television work for young children, early childhood educators, and parents. (Report No. PS-029467), Third world forum on early care and education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED453916). Athens, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans W (1996) Science and reason in film and television. Skeptical Inquirer 20(1):1–5Google Scholar
  18. Fetler M (1984) Television viewing and school achievement. J Commun 34:104–118. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02163.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser AB (1999) Badness survey. Accessed 20 Nov 2008
  20. Gaddy G (2001) Television’s impact on high school achievement. Public Opin Q 50:340–359. doi:10.1086/268988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerbner G (1987) Science on television: how it affects public conceptions. Issues Sci Technol (Spring):109–115Google Scholar
  22. Gorman S, Yu CC (1990) Science achievement and home environment: national assessment of educational progress 1985/1986 (Report No. TM-016266). Annual meeting of the american educational research association, (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED330702), Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenstein J (1954) Effects of television upon elementary school grades. J Educ Res 48:161–176Google Scholar
  24. Guthrie JT, Van Meter P, McCann AD, Wigfield A, Bennett L, Poundstone CC, Rice ME, Faibisch FM, Hunt B, Mitchell AM (1996) Growth of literacy engagement: changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly 31(3):306–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagborg WJ (1995) High school student television viewing time: a study of school performance and adjustment. Child Study J 25(3):155–167Google Scholar
  26. Hornik RC (1978) Television access and the slowing of cognitive growth. Am Educ Res J 15:1–15Google Scholar
  27. Hornik RC (1981) Out-of-school television and schooling: hypotheses and methods. Rev Educ Res 52:193–214Google Scholar
  28. Housden T (1991) Television viewing habits of San Juan students related to achievement (Report No. PS-020611). San Juan School District Television News (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED-345874), San Juan, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. Huston AC, Donnerstein E, Fairchild H, Feshbach ND, Katz PA, Murray JP, Rubinstein EA, Wilcox BL, Zuckerman D (1992) Big world, small screen: the role of television in American society. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  30. Jerome F (1988) A retreat and an advance for science and TV. Issues Sci Technol 4:87–93Google Scholar
  31. Keith TZ, Reimers TM, Fehrman PG, Pottebaum SM, Aubey IW (1986) Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. J Educ Psychol 78:373–380. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.5.373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiernan V (1996) Media exposure and knowledge about science. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the association for education in journalism and mass communication (79th, Anaheim, CA, August 9–13)Google Scholar
  33. Klein J (1979) The medium gets a message. Science News 115(22):361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levine DU, Levine RF (1996) Society and Education, 9th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, pp 121–124Google Scholar
  35. Liebert RM, Sprafkin J (1988) The early window: effects of television on children and youth. Pergamon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Lipps JH (1999) Beyond reason: science in the mass media. In: Schopf JW (ed) Evolution! Facts & fallacies. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 71–90Google Scholar
  37. Mediamark Research Inc (1996) Multimedia audiences: summary. MRI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Mielke KW (1994) On the relationship between television viewing and academic achievement. J Broadcast Electron Media 38(3):361–367Google Scholar
  39. National Assessment of Educational Progress (2000) National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed 17 Aug 2008
  40. Neuman SB (1986) Television and reading: a research synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. Neuman SB (1988) The displacement effect: assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance. Read Res Q 23:414–440. doi:10.2307/747641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neuman SB (1995) Literacy in the television age: the myth of the TV effect, 2nd edn. Ablex, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  43. Postman N (1992) Conscientious objections. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Potter WJ (1987) Does television viewing hinder academic achievement among adolescents? Hum Commun Res 14:27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00120.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Razel M (2001) The complex model of television viewing and educational achievement. J Educ Res 94(6):371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Report on Television (1998–2008) Nielsen Media ResearchGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridder JM (1963) Pupil opinions and the relationship of television viewing to academic achievement. J Educ Res 57:204–206Google Scholar
  48. Ridley-Johnson R, Cooper H, Chance J (1983) The relationship of children’s television viewing to school achievement and I.Q. J Educ Res 76:294–297Google Scholar
  49. Rossiter JR, Robertson TS (1975) Children’s television viewing: an examination of parent-child consensus. Sociometry 38:308–326. doi:10.2307/2786167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scarborough HS (1989) Prediction of reading disability from familial and individual differences. J Educ Psychol 81:101–108. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schramm W, Lyle J, Parker EB (1961) Television in the lives of our children. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  52. Signorielli N (1991) A sourcebook on children and television. Greenwood Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson FT, Austin WP (2003) Television viewing and academic achievement revisited. Education 124(1):194–202Google Scholar
  54. Wiggins JD (1987) Self-esteem, earned grades, and television viewing habits of students. Sch Counselor 35(2):128–133Google Scholar
  55. Williams PA, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ (1982) The impact of leisure-time television on school learning: a research synthesis. Am Educ Res J 19:19–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Physics, School of EducationState University of New York, College at Old WestburyOld WestburyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyHofstra UniversityHempsteadUSA

Personalised recommendations