Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 447–457 | Cite as

Ninth Graders’ Learning Interests, Life Experiences and Attitudes Towards Science & Technology

  • Shu-Nu ChangEmail author
  • Yau-Yuen Yeung
  • May Hung Cheng


Students’ learning interests and attitudes toward science have both been studied for decades. However, the connection between them with students’ life experiences about science and technology has not been addressed much. The purpose of this study is to investigate students’ learning interests and life experiences about science and technology, and also their attitudes toward technology. A total of 942 urban ninth graders in Taiwan were invited to participate in this study. A Likert scale questionnaire, which was developed from an international project, ROSE, was adapted to collect students’ ideas. The results indicated that boys showed higher learning interests in sustainability issues and scientific topics than girls. However, girls recalled more life experiences about science and technology in life than boys. The data also presented high values of Pearson correlation about learning interests and life experiences related to science and technology, and in the perspective on attitudes towards technology. Ways to promote girls’ learning interests about science and technology and the implications of teaching and research are discussed as well.


Learning interest Life experiences Attitudes towards technology Ninth grader 


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989) Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Baram-Tsabari A, Sethi RJ, Bry L, Yarden A (2006) Using questions sent to an Ask-A-Scientist site to identify children’s interests in science. Sci Educ 90(6):1050–1072. doi: 10.1002/sce.20163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blalock C, Lichtenstein M, Owen S, Pruski L, Marshall C, Toepperwein M (2008) In pursuit of validity: a comprehensive review of science attitude instruments 1935–2005. Int J Sci Educ 30(7):961–977. doi: 10.1080/09500690701344578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brotman JS, Moore FM (2008) Girls and science: a review of four themes in the science education literature. J Res Sci Teach 45(9):971–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burkham DT, Lee VE, Smerdon BA (1997) Gender and science learning early in high school: subject matter and laboratory experiences. Am Educ Res J 34(2):297–331Google Scholar
  6. Crawley FE, Koballa TR (1994) Attitude research in science education: contemporary models and methods. Sci Educ 78:35–55. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730780103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crombie G, Sinclair NL, Silverthorn N, Byrne BM, DuBois DL, Trinneer A (2005) Predictors of young adolescents’ math grades and course enrollment intentions: gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles 52:351–367. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-2678-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeBoer GE (2000) Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. J Res Sci Teach 37(6):582–601. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<;582::AID-TEA5>;3.0.CO;2-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francis LJ, Greer JE (1999) Measuring attitude towards science among secondary school students: the affective domain. Res Sci Technol Educ 17(2):219–226. doi: 10.1080/0263514990170207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher JJ (1971) A broader base for science teaching. Sci Educ 55(4):329–338Google Scholar
  11. Gardner PL (1975) Attitudes to science: a review. Stud Sci Educ 2:1–41. doi: 10.1080/03057267508559818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner PL (1996) The dimensionality of attitude scales: a widely misunderstood idea. Int J Sci Educ 18(8):913–919. doi: 10.1080/0950069960180804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gauld C, Hukins A (1980) Scientific attitudes: a review. Stud Sci Educ 7:129–161. doi: 10.1080/03057268008559877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. George R (2006) A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. Int J Sci Educ 28(6):571–589. doi: 10.1080/09500690500338755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert J (2001) Science and it’s ‘Other’: looking underneath ‘woman’ and ‘science’ for new directions in research on gender and science education. Gend Educ 13(3):291–305. doi: 10.1080/09540250120063571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert J, Calvert S (2003) Challenging accepted wisdom: looking at the gender and science education question through a different lens. Int J Sci Educ 25(7):861–878. doi: 10.1080/09500690305030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson S (1987) Gender differences in science: parallels in interest, experience and performance. Int J Sci Educ 9(4):467–481. doi: 10.1080/0950069870090405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones MG, Howe A, Rua MJ (2000) Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Sci Educ 84(2):180–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<;180::AID-SCE3>;3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahle JB, Meece J (1994) Research on gender issues in the classroom. In: Gable D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 542–557Google Scholar
  20. Krogh L, Thomsen P (2005) Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: border crossing into the physics classroom. Int J Sci Educ 27(3):281–302Google Scholar
  21. Lee VE, Burkham DT (1996) Gender differences in middle-grade science achievement: subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Sci Educ 80(6):613–650. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199611)80:6<;613::AID-SCE1>;3.0.CO;2-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lichtenstein MJ, Owen SV, Blalock CL, Liu Y, Ramirez KA, Pruski LA, Marshall CE, Toepperwein MA (2008) Psychometric reevaluation of the scientific attitude inventory-revised (SAI-II). J Res Sci Teach 45(5):600–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller PH, Blessing JS, Schwartz S (2006) Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. Int J Sci Educ 28(4):363–381. doi: 10.1080/09500690500277664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy P, Whitelegg E (2006) Girls and physics: continuing barriers to ‘belonging’. Curric J 17(3):281–305. doi: 10.1080/09585170600909753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakazawa C, Takahira S (2001) Gender differences in science learning of japanese junior high school students: a two year study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  26. National Society for the Study of Education (1947) Science education in american schools: forty-sixth yearbook of the NSSE. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Osborne J, Driver R, Simon S (1998) Attitudes to science: issues and concerns. Sch Sci Rev 79(288):27–33Google Scholar
  28. Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Educ 25(9):1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramsden JM (1998) Mission impossible? Can anything be done about attitudes to science? Int J Sci Educ 20(2):125–137. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scherz Z, Oren M (2006) How to change students’ images of science and technology. Sci Educ 90(6):965–985. doi: 10.1002/sce.20159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schibeci R (1984) Attitudes to Science: an update. Stud Sci Educ 11(1):26–59. doi: 10.1080/03057268408559913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schreiner C, Sjøberg S (2004) Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) - a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education. Oslo: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel MA, Ranney MA (2003) Developing the changes in attitude about the relevance of science (CARS) questionnaire and assessing two high school science classes. J Res Sci Teach 40(8):757–775. doi: 10.1002/tea.10110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson RD, Koballa TR, Oliver JS, Crawley FE (1994) Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In: Gabel D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 211–234Google Scholar
  35. Sjøberg S (2000) Science and scientists: The SAS study. Retrieved 1 September 2005 from
  36. Sjøberg S, Schreiner C (2005) How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from ROSE. Asia-Pacific Forum on Learning and Teaching, l6(2), Foreword. [Online]
  37. Skog B (2001) Girls’ avoidance of ‘hard’ science subjects-protest or a rational choice? Scand J Educ Res 35(3):201–211. doi: 10.1080/0031383910350304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuan HL, Chin CC, Shieh SH (2005) The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. Int J Sci Educ 27(6):639–654. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Viefers S, Christie M, Ferdos F (2006) Gender equity in higher education: why and how? A case study of gender issues in a science faculty. Eur J Eng Educ 31(1):15–22. doi: 10.1080/03043790500429948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weinburgh M (1995) Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970–1991. J Res Sci Teach 32:387–398. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yeung YY, Cheng MH (2007) Hong Kong junior secondary school students’ affective domain of science learning: Preliminary findings from the international “ROSE” study. Paper presented at the conference on integrated learning, 14–15 Dec, 2007, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeung YY, Cheng MH (2008) Secondary school students’ affective domain of science learning: Comparison of preliminary ROSE findings in Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Shanghai. Paper presented at the Conference of Asian Science Education, Feb 20–23, 2008, KaohsiungGoogle Scholar
  43. Zohar A, Bronshtein B (2005) Physics teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding girls’ low participation rates in advanced physics classes. Int J Sci Educ 27(1):61–77. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000138798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish National Graduate School in Science and Technology Education Research, Department of Social and Welfare StudiesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Science, Social Sciences and TechnologyHong Kong Institute of EducationHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations