Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 530–543 | Cite as

Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds

  • Constance Steinkuehler
  • Sean DuncanEmail author


In today’s increasingly “flat” world of globalization (Friedman 2005), the need for a scientifically literate citizenry has grown more urgent. Yet, by some measures, we have done a poor job at fostering scientific habits of mind in schools. Recent research on informal games-based learning indicates that such technologies and the communities they evoke may be one viable alternative—not as a substitute for teachers and classrooms, but as an alternative to textbooks and science labs. This paper presents empirical evidence about the potential of games for fostering scientific habits of mind. In particular, we examine the scientific habits of mind and dispositions that characterize online discussion forums of the massively multiplayer online game World of Warcraft. Eighty-six percent of the forum discussions were posts engaged in “social knowledge construction” rather than social banter. Over half of the posts evidenced systems based reasoning, one in ten evidenced model-based reasoning, and 65% displayed an evaluative epistemology in which knowledge is treated as an open-ended process of evaluation and argument.


Informal science reasoning Virtual worlds Social knowledge construction Game-based learning Informal learning 


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Barab S, Arcici A, Jackson C (2005) Eat your vegetables and do your homework: a design-based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educ Technol 45(1):15–21Google Scholar
  3. Barab SA, Sadler T, Heiselt C, Hickey D, Zuiker S (2007) Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: a framework for socio-scientific inquiry. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):59–82. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basic (n.d.) Scaling model. Retrieved November 1, 2007 from
  5. Chi MTH (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. J Learn Sci 6(3):271–315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chinn CA, Malhotra B (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Sci Educ 86(2):175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey J (1897) My pedagogic creed. Sch J 14(3):77–80Google Scholar
  8. Dewey J (1910) Science as subject matter and as method. Science 31(787):121–127. doi: 10.1126/science.31.787.121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elsner A (2005) Is US becoming hostile to science? Retrieved October 31, 2005 from
  10. Friedman TL (2005) The world is flat. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gee JP (2003) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes E Games I Learning through game design: a review of current software & research. Games Cult (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins H III (1992) Textual poachers: television fans & participatory culture. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Ketelhut DJ (2007) The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: an exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):99–111. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ketelhut DJ, Dede C, Clarke J, Nelson B, Bowman C (2007) Studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. In: Baker E, Dickieson J, Wulfeck W, O’Neil H (eds), Assessment of problem solving using simulations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn D (1992) Thinking as argument. Harv Educ Rev 62(2):155–178Google Scholar
  17. Lave J (1988) Cognition in practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Levy P (1999) Collective intelligence. (Robert Bononno, trans.). Perseus Books, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayer RE (1992) Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 2nd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller JD (2004) Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Underst Sci 13(3):273–294. doi: 10.1177/0963662504044908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nasir NS (2005) Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. J Learn Sci 14(1):5–34. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1401_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson B, Ketelhut DJ, Clarke J, Dieterle E, Dede C, Erlandson B (2007) Robust design strategies for scaling educational innovations: The River City MUVE case study. In: Shelton BE, Wiley DA (eds) The design and use of simulation computer games in education. Sense Press, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Osborne J, Erduren S, Simon S (2004) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J Res Sci Teach 41(10):994–1020. doi: 10.1002/tea.20035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poincaré H (2001) Science and hypothesis. In: Gould SJ (ed) The value of science: essential writings of Henri Poincare. The Modern Library, New York, pp 7–180 (Original work published 1905)Google Scholar
  27. Schwab JJ (1962) The teaching of science as enquiry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaffer DW, Squire KD, Halverson R, Gee JP (2005) Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan 87(2):105–111Google Scholar
  29. Singer SR, Hilton M, Schweingruber HA (2005) America’s lab report: investigations in high school science. The National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Solomon A (2004, July 10) The closing of the American book. The New York Times p. A17Google Scholar
  31. Squire K (2003) Replaying history: learning world history through playing Civilization III. Unpublished dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington INGoogle Scholar
  32. Squire KD (2005) Educating the fighter. Horizon 13(2):75–88. doi: 10.1108/10748120510608106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinkuehler CA (2004) Learning in massively multiplayer online games. In: Kafai YB, Sandoval WA, Enyedy N, Nixon AS, Herrera F (eds) Proceedings of the sixth ICLS. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 521–528Google Scholar
  34. Steinkuehler CA (2005) Cognition and learning in massively multiplayer online games: a critical approach. Unpublished dissertation. University of Wisconsin, Madison WIGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinkuehler C (2006a) The mangle of play. Games Cult 1(3):1–14Google Scholar
  36. Steinkuehler CA (2006b) Massively multiplayer online videogaming as participation in a Discourse. Mind Cult Act 13(1):38–52. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1301_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinkuehler CA (2006c) Why game (culture) studies now? Games Cult 1(1):1–6Google Scholar
  38. Steinkuehler C, Chmiel M (2006) Fostering scientific habits of mind in the context of online play. In: Barab SA, Hay KE, Songer NB, Hickey DT (eds) Proceedings of the international conference of the learning sciences. Erlbuam, Mahwah NJ, pp 723–729Google Scholar
  39. Steinkuehler C (2007) Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. eLearning 4(3):297–318Google Scholar
  40. Steinkuehler CA (2008a) Cognition and literacy in massively multiplayer online games. In: Coiro J, Knobel M, Lankshear C, Leu D (eds) Handbook of research on new literacies. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 611–634Google Scholar
  41. Steinkuehler C (2008b) Massively multiplayer online games as an educational technology: an outline for research. Educ Technol 48(1):10–21Google Scholar
  42. Woodcock BS (2008) An analysis of MMOG subscription growth 23.0. Retrieved April 21, 2008 from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum & InstructionUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations