Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 369–377 | Cite as

Building a Common Platform on Students’ Participation

  • Mattias LundinEmail author
Original Paper
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

This article sets out to examine how school science activities can encourage students’ participation while supporting a specific science content. One ordinary class with 12-year-old students was chosen and their regular classroom work was studied without intervention and with a minimum of interference. Lessons were video filmed, transcribed and analyzed focussing on the participants’ speech acts. It was found that students’ initiatives and experiences were important parts of their participation. The results show how students’ participation was orchestrated with a science content by means of four different kinds of activities. The activities are called ‘individual inventory of experiences’, ‘building a common platform of experiences’, ‘sharing new experiences’ and ‘concluding a common platform’. The activities form a foundation for participation in human biology topics. For example, to ‘build a common platform of experiences’ seems to level out students’ different prerequisites for participating in subsequent tasks. Furthermore, to ‘conclude a common platform’ implied a checkpoint of the shared new experiences. The activities support students’ tentative use of scientific words as well as their learning of what counts as knowledge in the school science setting. However, it can be questioned if the time spent on each separate activity is necessary or if similar achievements could be made even if some activities were integrated. The question is open for further research.

Keywords

Science project Teaching activities Science learning 

References

  1. Bergqvist K, Säljö R (2004) Learning to plan. In: Van der Linden J, Renshaw P (eds) Dialogic learning. Shifting perspectives to learning, instruction, and teaching. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 109–124Google Scholar
  2. Billig M, Condor S, Edwards D, Gane M, Middleton D, Radley A (1988) Ideological dilemmas. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Çalik M, Alipasa A, Coll RK (2006a) A constructivist-based model for the teaching of dissolution of gas in a liquid. Asia-Pac Forum Sci Learn Teach 7(1):1Google Scholar
  4. Çalik M, Ayas A, Coll RK, Ünal S, Coştu B (2006b) Investigating the effectiveness of a constructivist-based teaching model on student understanding of the dissolution of gases in liquids. J Sci Educ Technol. Retrieved 14 March 2007 from http://www.springerlink.com/content/18p1v4t96025m531
  5. Carlgren I (1994) Från klassundervisning till »eget arbete«. Praxis 2:9–14Google Scholar
  6. Dewey J (1910/1997) How we think. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey J (1913/1975) Interest and effort in education. Southern Illinois University Press, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey J (1938/1998) Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
  9. Driver R (1983) The student as scientist? Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  10. Khishfe R, Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(7):551–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lundin M, Lindahl M (2005) Experiences and their role in science education. J Baltic Sci Educ 1(7):31–39Google Scholar
  12. Mercer N (1995) The guided construction of knowledge. Multilingual Matters, ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  13. Millar R (1989) Bending the evidence: the relationship between theory and experiment in science education. In: Millar R (ed) Doing science: images of science in science education. Falmer, London, pp 38–61Google Scholar
  14. Ogborn J, Kress G, Martins I, McGillicuddy K (1996) Explaining science in the classroom. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  15. Östman L (2003) Transaktion, sociokulturella praktiker och meningsskapande: ett forskningsprogram. In: Östman L (ed) Erfarenhet och situation i handling. Pedagogisk forskning 147. Uppsala universitet, Uppsala, pp 91–118Google Scholar
  16. Schiefele U (1991) Interest, learning and motivation. Educ Psychol 26(3–4):299–323Google Scholar
  17. Sutton C (1996) Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. Int J Sci Educ 18(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Szybek P (2002) Science education – an event staged on two stages simultaneously. Sci & Educ 11:525–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Utbildningsdepartementet (1994) Läroplaner för det obligatoriska skolväsendet. Retrieved 8 March 2006 from http://www.skolverket.se/skolfs?id=258
  20. Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Pure and Applied Natural SciencesUniversity of KalmarKalmarSweden

Personalised recommendations