Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 337–352 | Cite as

The Gateway Science Workshop Program: Enhancing Student Performance and Retention in the Sciences Through Peer-Facilitated Discussion

  • Denise DraneEmail author
  • H. David Smith
  • Greg Light
  • Larry Pinto
  • Su Swarat


Minority student attrition and underachievement is a long-standing and widespread concern in higher education. It is especially acute in introductory science courses which are prerequisites for students planning to pursue science-related careers. Poor performance in these courses often results in attrition of minorities from the science fields. This is a particular concern at selective universities where minority students enter with excellent academic credentials but receive lower average grades and have lower retention rates than majority students with similar credentials. This paper reports the first year results of a large scale peer-facilitated workshop program designed to increase performance and retention in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics at a selective research university. After adjusting for grade point average or SAT-Math score, workshop participants earned higher final grades than nonparticipants in Biology and Chemistry, but not in Physics. Similar effects on retention were found. While, positive effects of the program were observed in both majority and minority students, effect sizes were generally largest for minority students. Because of practical constraints in Physics, implementation of the program was not optimal, possibly accounting for the differential success of the program across disciplines.


peer learning collaborative learning workshop minority science biology chemistry physics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Retrieved May 6, 2003, from
  2. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T., and Rosenborough, T. M. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Journal of Sociological Review 16: 461–468.Google Scholar
  3. Bligh, D. (2000). What’s the Point in Discussion? Intellect, Exeter, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Bonsangue, M. V., and Drew, D. E. (1995). Increasing minority students success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Fostering Student Success in Quantitative Gateway Courses 61: 23–33.Google Scholar
  5. Born, W., Revelle, W., and Pinto, L. (2002). Improving biology performance with workshop groups. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11: 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chavez, M., and Maestas-Flores, M. (1991). Minority student retention: ENLACE. New Directions for Community Colleges 74: 63–67.Google Scholar
  7. Clewell, B. C., and Ficklen, M. S. (1987). Effective institutional practices for improving minority retention in higher education. Journal of College Admissions 116: 7–13.Google Scholar
  8. Croizet, J., Desert, M., Dutrevis, M., and Leylens, J. (2001). Stereotype threat, social class, gender, and academic under-achievement: When our reputation Catches up to us and takes over. Social Psychology of Education 4: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. College Entrance Examination Board (1999). Reaching the Top: A Report of the National Task Force on Minority High Achievement (Item No. 201635), College Entrance Examination Board, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Fullilove, R. E., and Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkley: An evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program. Journal of Negro Education 59(3): 49–64.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, M. (1995). MathExcel: A special opportunity in calculus. Unpublished Report, Department of Mathematics, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  12. Gosser, D., Roth, V., Gafney, L., Kampmeier, J., Strozak, V., Varna-Nelson, P., Radel, S., and Weiner, M. (1996). Workshop Chemistry: Overcoming barriers to student success. The Chemical Educator 1: 2–3.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, C., Baker, R. W., and Wapner, S. (1984). Prior interracial experience and Black student transition into predominantly white colleges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 1146–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grandy, J. (1998). Persistence in science of high ability minority students: Results of a longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education 69: 589–620.Google Scholar
  15. Grayson, J. P. (1998). Racial origin and student retention in a Canadian university. Higher Education 36: 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaques, D. (2000). Learning in Groups—A Handbook for Improving Group Work, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Levin, M. E., and Levin, J. R. (1991). A critical examination of academic retention programs for at-risk minority college students. Journal of College Student Development 31: 323–334.Google Scholar
  19. Light, G., and Cox, R. (2001). Learning and Teaching in Higher Education—The Reflective Professional, Paul Chapman, London.Google Scholar
  20. Loo, C. M., and Rolison, G. (1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly white university. Journal of Higher Education 57: 58–77.Google Scholar
  21. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2004). Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2004, NSF 04-317, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
  22. Selvin, P. (1992). Math education: Multiplying the meager numbers. Science 258: 1200–1201.Google Scholar
  23. Seymor, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  24. Shadish, W. R., Robinson, L., and Lu, C. (1999). ES: A Computer. Program for Effect Size Calculation, St. Paul, MN: Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  25. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., and Donovan, S. (1998). Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis (Research Monograph No. 11), University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education, Madison.Google Scholar
  26. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologis 52: 613–629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., and Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23), Academic Press, New York, pp. 379–440.Google Scholar
  28. Tien, L. T., Roth, V., and Kampmeier, J. A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39: 606–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tracey, T. J., and Sedlacek, W. E. (1984). Noncognitive variables in predicting academic success by race. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 16: 171–178.Google Scholar
  30. Tracey, T. J., and Sedlacek, W. E. (1985). The relationship of noncognitive variables to academic success. A longitudinal comparison by race. Journal of College Student Personnel 26: 405–410.Google Scholar
  31. Tracey, T. J., and Sedlacek, W. E. (1987). Prediction of college graduation using noncognitive variables by race. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 19: 177–184.Google Scholar
  32. Treisman, P. M. (1985). A Study of the Mathematics Performance of Black Students at the University of California, Berkley. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar
  33. Treisman, P. V. (1990). Studying students studying calculas: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal 23(5): 362–372.Google Scholar
  34. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal 23: 362–372.Google Scholar
  35. Vars, F. E., and Bowen, W. G. (1998). Scholastic aptitude test scores, race and academic performance in selective colleges and universities. In Jencks, C., and Meredit, P. (Eds.), The Black-White Test Score Gap. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 457–479.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Drane
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. David Smith
    • 1
  • Greg Light
    • 1
  • Larry Pinto
    • 2
  • Su Swarat
    • 1
  1. 1.Searle Center for Teaching ExcellenceNorthwestern UniversityEvanston
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and PhysiologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations